[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-07-09 Thread Stephan Buys
Blueprint changed by Stephan Buys: Whiteboard changed to: 2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec? é 21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want 13/07/2007

[Bug 246558] Re: ssh's init script should generate host keys if they're missing

2008-07-09 Thread Soren Hansen
Attaching the patch as I originially intended it to look. I didn't know that not having hostkeys was valid (and am still rather surprised that's the case). Do you have an example sshd_config that doesn't use host keys? The documentation says it has defaults for HostKey, so even if they're not

[Blueprint ebox] Ebox in Ubuntu

2008-07-09 Thread Nuanda
Blueprint changed by Nuanda: Whiteboard changed to: What are the requirements for graphical management? Christian Merlin 2008-07-09 It could be worderfull to integrate SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) on Ebox. It's a calendar server that uses LDAP for users autenthication and PostgreSQL

[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-07-09 Thread Stephan Buys
Blueprint changed by Stephan Buys: Whiteboard changed to: 2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec? é 21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want 13/07/2007

[Bug 174805] Re: [gutsy] graceful-stop fails when apache listens on more than one socket

2008-07-09 Thread Guillermo Pérez
Please, reopen this bug. It's still affecting gutsy. It shouldn't be hard to backport this change. Currently gutsy is unusable as a webserver in production evironments, and upgrade to hardy is usually a hard task it must be handle with a lot of care. This is a must fix! -- [gutsy] graceful-stop

[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server

2008-07-09 Thread James Hyland
Blueprint changed by James Hyland: Whiteboard changed to: 2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec? é 21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want 13/07/2007

[Bug 242325] Re: [SRU] Samba with ldap passwd sync = only fails to change passwords

2008-07-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba Status: Unknown = Fix Released -- [SRU] Samba with ldap passwd sync = only fails to change passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. --

[Bug 239513] Re: stack smashing detected when calling xmlrpc_set_type

2008-07-09 Thread Chuck Short
I was able to reproduce this error on both hardy and intrepid. As a consequence I have opened up a bug in the php bug tracker. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45465 Thanks for the bug report. Regards chuck ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- stack smashing

[Bug 222804] Re: fail2ban fails to start after reboot

2008-07-09 Thread Chris Coulson
As Matt LaPlante pointed out above, this should be eligible for a SRU, as the bug is a regression from a previous version -- fail2ban fails to start after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a

[Bug 222804] Re: fail2ban fails to start after reboot

2008-07-09 Thread Chris Coulson
This is actually fixed in 0.8.2-3 in Intrepid, so I'm marking it as Fix Released as per the bug triage process. If you want it in Hardy, someone needs to add a milestone I think, and I don't know how to do that ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- fail2ban

[Bug 222804] Re: fail2ban fails to start after reboot

2008-07-09 Thread Chuck Short
ISSUE: fail2ban does not restart after reboot because of /var/run being a tmpfs, so no pid file can be created. I have attached the debdiff which fixes this issue. This has been backported from intrepid. TEST CASE: 1. Install fail2ban 2. Reboot 3. Restart fail2ban after reboot see if it starts.

[Bug 222804] Re: fail2ban fails to start after reboot

2008-07-09 Thread Chuck Short
** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = In Progress -- [SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 246990] Re: amavisd-release broken on 8.04 LTS

2008-07-09 Thread AlberTUX
found with amavisd-new version: 1:2.5.3-1ubuntu3 -- amavisd-release broken on 8.04 LTS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 246990] [NEW] amavisd-release broken on 8.04 LTS

2008-07-09 Thread AlberTUX
Public bug reported: with the default installation issuing a amavisd-release mail-id will fail with the following error: Can't connect to UNIX socket /var/lib/amavis/amavisd.sock: No such file or directory at /usr/sbin/amavisd-release line 203. in /usr/sbin/amavisd-release the $socketname

[Bug 203169] Re: status function for init scripts

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Updated samba patch. The last had a transposed character. s/nmdb/nmbd/g :-Dustin ** Attachment added: samba.status.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15921399/samba.status.debdiff -- status function for init scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203169 You received this bug

[Bug 228619] Re: samba group share not writable by group members

2008-07-09 Thread dawning
I'm having this same issue. I've tried tons of variants using create mask security mask directory mask force [the above] I've tried placing them only in my [global] sections, in each of my shares and in both. Regardless, I get the same result. I can get create mask to create files with fewer

[Bug 228619] Re: samba group share not writable by group members

2008-07-09 Thread dawning
Ahaw! Sufficient digging has returned THE solution. THE solution entails knowing what the hell you're trying to do (RTFM FTW). try this: man smb.conf I just threw the following in my smb.conf to get totally uselessly open perms on files created by users: [global] stuff [share1] other

[Bug 247084] Re: bind9 init script status_of_proc() call should use pid

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Attachment added: bind9.status.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15923978/bind9.status.debdiff ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: New = In Progress -- bind9 init script status_of_proc()

[Bug 247084] [NEW] bind9 init script status_of_proc() call should use pid

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 Related to changes from Bug #203169; filing as a new bug because that one is getting too big for its own good. The bind9 init script's call to status_of_proc() call should pass named's pidfile. Patch attached. :-Dustin ** Affects: bind9

[Bug 247096] Re: dovevot init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Patch attached. :-Dustin ** Attachment added: dovecot.status.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15924345/dovecot.status.debdiff ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: New = In Progress

[Bug 247096] [NEW] dovevot init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Public bug reported: Related to changes from Bug #203169; filing as a new bug because that one is getting too big for its own good. Patch forthcoming, as soon as I get assigned a new bug number from Launchpad... :-Dustin ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee:

[Bug 247103] [NEW] ssh init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Public bug reported: Related to changes from Bug #203169; filing as a new bug because that one is getting too big for its own good. Patch forthcoming as soon as I have a bug number... :-Dustin ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)

[Bug 247087] Re: samba init script status action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Attachment added: samba.status.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15924057/samba.status.debdiff -- samba init script status action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in

[Bug 247087] Re: samba init script status action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Target: None = ubuntu-8.10-beta ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #488275 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488275 ** Also affects: samba (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488275 Importance: Unknown

[Bug 203169] Re: status function for init scripts

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
As pointed out by LaMont Jones, this bug has grown unwieldy. I'm breaking it out into a separate bug for each package/patch: * at: Bug #247091 * bind9: Bug #247084 * cron: Bug #201504 * dovecot: Bug #247096 * openssh: Bug #247103 * samba: Bug #247087 * syslogkd: Bug #247106 :-Dustin --

[Bug 247087] Re: samba init script status action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Patch updated to account for: * nmbd disabled * running from inetd :-Dustin ** Attachment added: samba.status.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15924851/samba.status.debdiff -- samba init script status action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247087 You received this bug notification

[Bug 247087] Re: samba init script status action

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Patch updated, merging the last two. We should test for nmbd disabled before checking it's status, then test for running from inetd before checking smbd's status, and then return 4 if nmbd is disabled and smbd is running from inetd. :-Dustin ** Attachment added: samba.status.debdiff

Re: [Bug 208695] Re: Cannot upgrade to mysql-server-5.0

2008-07-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:30:23PM -, Martin Pitt wrote: rejecting your mysql 5.0.51a-3ubuntu6 upload from hardy-proposed; it seems you patched against 5.0.51a-3ubuntu5 in hardy instaed of 5.0.51a- 3ubuntu5.1 in hardy-updates Reuploaded as 3ubuntu5.2. -- Steve Langasek

[Bug 246990] Re: amavisd-release broken on 8.04 LTS

2008-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Look in /etc/amavis/conf.d/25-amavis_helpers and see if $unix_socketname = /var/run/amavis/amavis.sock; - change it to $unix_socketname = /var/lib/amavis/amavis.sock; - this is now the default for the package. See Bug #199124 for details. As a guess, during the upgrade there was a prompt for

[Bug 203169] Re: status function for init scripts

2008-07-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: lsb (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- status function for init scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 247087] Re: samba init script status action

2008-07-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- samba init script status action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 105457] Re: mysqd_safe high cpu usage

2008-07-09 Thread Torsten Bronger
Can someone confirm Eskimo's report? Actually, mysqld_safe is part of mysql-server-5.0, so I can't really believe that this disables it. -- mysqd_safe high cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 203169] Re: status function for init scripts

2008-07-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: lsb (Debian) Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #483285 = Debian Bug tracker #490095 Status: Fix Released = Unknown -- status function for init scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 203169] Re: status function for init scripts

2008-07-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: lsb (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- status function for init scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list