This also happens when using ldap backend. I'm suspecting that the
slapd.preinst is the culprit to this bug:
dump_databases() { # {{{
# If the user wants us to dump the databases they are dumped to the
# configured directory.
I forgot too mention, that I am running Jaunty Desktop install
--
dhcp3 fails to start during boot-time but starts seamlessly invoking the
init-script manually
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61903
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed
Yes the printer does have the hand and it was working fine under 8.04.. I
also do not have ability to do the workaround as my GUI does not show
windows printer via Sambaunder networked printers in the
systemadminprinting GUI menu.. ( why not??)
The person who did the workaround used the 64 bit
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more precise then what I already said: cat
motorman: I was the creator of the workaround on a 32-bit system. I have
since loaded a 64-bit system and, yes, it doesn't have this bug.
While it could be a Windows problem, possibly something isn't right with your
SAMBA setup. Even is SAMBA isn't installed, smbclient utilizes the samba.conf
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better.
Unfortunately, neither Feisty or Gutsy are supported anymore, therefore
we request that you upgrade to a supported version of Ubuntu and if this
is an issue, then feel free to report it, as with any other bugs you
find. Thank you.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
st...@zippy:/etc$ sudo apt-get install samba
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
openbsd-inetd inet-superserver smbldap-tools ldb-tools
The following NEW packages
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27319619/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27319620/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
Was attempting to install Samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382034
You received this bug
Ed, Thanks , I did some checking and I have two other winxp systems each
with printers attached, both can print on the other machine.
I tried to follow someone who wrote about modifying smb.conf and messed it
up so badly that I downloaded a default version from ubuntu 8.4 as can't
find a default
Fixed.
In a (misguided?) attempt to do a clean install of samba, I archived all
the files in the /etc/samba directory into a zip file. With those files
in the zip file, the install showed the above error. After
uncompressing those files and re-running the apt-get install, the
install worked and
Teej, this is definitely still a problem in Jaunty, as /sbin/dhclient-
script has not changed
DHCPREQUEST of 71.130.218.22 on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK of 71.130.218.22 from 192.168.1.254
SIOCADDRT: No such process
bound to 71.130.218.22 -- renewal in 78774 seconds.
from
Haven;t have any problems recently. Thanks.
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 16:56 +, Teej wrote:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is
15 matches
Mail list logo
