I installed a fresh server today and ran into than issue, so as of today
the fix is not available
--
dovecot sieve plugin renamed from cmusieve to sieve
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
In /etc/init.d/ntp you sync with the ntp servers with this line:
/usr/sbin/ntpdate -s -b $NTPDATE_OPTIONS $tickers /dev/null
After that the script starts ntpd with this line
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --oknodo --pidfile $PIDFILE --startas
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: postfix
Using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - the Lucid Lynx - released in April 2010.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: postfix 2.7.0-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48531313/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48531314/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Df.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48531315/Df.txt
** Attachment added:
On 16.05.2010 08:21, Lox wrote:
I installed a fresh server today and ran into than issue, so as of today
the fix is not available
If you did a fresh install, you couldn't have experienced this bug. This
bug is about change in configuration scheme for dovecot between two
Ubuntu releases,
Public bug reported:
I have been using 10.04 AMD64 on my desktop since its release. The
network was working fine. Recently I booted and the network manager
shows no connection. Tried every fix I could find and then tried a
clean install. When I booted from the LiveCD the connection was again
Have you tried running sudo dhclient3 eth0 from a command line? What
happens when you try this?
--
cannot connect to router via ethernet - lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581240
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3
Public bug reported:
Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
All changes have been incorporated in the Debian package.
c3p0 (0.9.1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* Depend on java2-runtime-headless instead of java2-runtime
[ Torsten
Listening on LPF/eth0/6c:f0:49:1e:26:92
Sending on LPF/eth0/6c:f0:49:1e:26:92
Sending on Socket/fallback
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 20
DHCPDISCOVER
I heartily agree with the person who filed this bug report!
Please issue a PHP without the suhosin patch, for those of us for whom
the patch creates more problems than it solves.
Baking the suhosin patch into the PHP distro has been very bad for those
of us whose Web services have been disrupted
** Changed in: c3p0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Sync c3p0 0.9.1.2-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to c3p0 in ubuntu.
--
This bug was fixed in the package c3p0 - 0.9.1.2-4
---
c3p0 (0.9.1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* Depend on java2-runtime-headless instead of java2-runtime
[ Torsten Werner ]
* Remove Arnaud from uploaders list.
* Update Standards-Version:
I've updated the title and marked the bug against the multipath-tools
package as well.
I'm a little skeptical about that though... The multipath-tools package
has only had two minor changes since 10 Mar 2009. Unless something new
in libvirt is only now exposing this issue...
** Summary
Excuse me to enter this thread lately, but something looks weird to me
here.
I've just experienced the same issue with Lucid, trying to set up samba server,
on a Wifi hooked laptop.
With current samba-server package, result after Lucid boots is:
- smbd is running
- nmbd is not running
leading
For the update script 11_to_12, I modified
src/cats/update_mysql_tables.in, made it executable, and started it with
'-u root -p' as well. Changed 'bindir' and 'db_name'.
--
Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for
database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntpdate
After clean install of karmic if I issue the command ntpdate, it shows
'no servers can be used, exiting'.
** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ntpdate doesn't work by default in karmic
$ sudo apt-get install rabbitmq-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
erlang-os-mon erlang-snmp
Suggested packages:
erlang-nox erlang-x11 erlang erlang-manpages erlang-doc-html
The
not sure if this should be a separate item or not, but as well as the
interface it doesn't restart dnsmasq.
For anyone else trying to do that I believe the steps needed are:
stop libvirt-bin
killall dnsmasq (assuming you don't have another)
ifconfig virbr0 down
brctl delbr virbr0
now,
I am having the same issue, daemon.log reports
May 16 16:58:46 mythbox init: mysql pre-start process (23901)
terminated with status 1
I can start the process manually with sudo -u mysql mysqld
--
mysql server will not start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573318
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
If you screw up the xml file /var/lib/libvirt/network/default.xml and then
restart it doesn't tell you what you did wrong
or indeed there was any mistake - it just rewrites it with its best parse.
I'm ok with it rewriting it but it should give some diagnostics to let you
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48559553/Dependencies.txt
--
No diagnostics on incorrect network xml file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581369
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Upgrading from 9.10 to 10.04
Samba asks to replace smb.conf. Replaces with maintainers version hit continue
and apt crashed trying to upgrade samba.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48561851/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48561852/SambaInstalledVersions.txt
** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better.
Usually, no servers can be used means either there are no accessible
NTP servers to be polled, or that NTP is running. But you did not give
us enough information to determine what actually happened. Consider
collecting more data,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
I only want install the Squid, and this problem happened
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48562620/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Df.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48562621/Df.txt
** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48562622/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment added:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -, Nicolas M wrote:
= So my question here: why having a different startup condition for
smbd and nmbd, as both daemons need to be running for samba to operate ?
Because:
- nmbd is only needed for operations in some environments, so smbd should
not
Er. Correction on #3 above: 'sudo ntpdate -v pool.ntp.org', sorry for
the typo. Also, add in here the contents of /etc/default/ntpdate. Thank
you.
--
ntpdate doesn't work by default in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Ok Steve, not being a Samba guru, was just trying to figure this out.
After having browsed through the well known Using Samba
(http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/toc.html), I did not get
this understanding of smbd versus nmbd.
I've been using Samba like that (smbd+nmbd, with or without
Why do you think you need nmbd to start at all when you don't have a
network?
I think you need to be explicit here about what problem you were seeing
when using the standard nmbd.conf.
--
nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169
You
** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Luke Faraone (lfaraone)
** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
Typo in etc/init/vsftpd.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577165
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
31 matches
Mail list logo
