[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2011-04-08 Thread Richard Neuböck
I've tested the packages (especially qemu*) from lucid-proposed successfully. This time on a different machine but same hard- and software setup as before. Intense read and write tests on a 2TB filesystem ran for 24h without corrupting the filesystem. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2011-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574665 Title: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

[Bug 688522] Re: [FTBFS] Eucalyptus doesn't build on maverick, with -security pocket enabled

2011-04-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Dave, please backport the natty change to maverick and lucid, so that we do not have to back out the openjdk change for maverick and lucid anymore. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Invalid =

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Just discussed on IRC, we'll drop the webbrowser package from mono for now, and will reintroduce it once the webkit port is ready. ** Changed in: mono (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Halse Rogers (raof) ** Changed in: mono (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in:

[Bug 747090] Re: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu)

2011-04-08 Thread David Planella
** Changed in: ubuntu-translations Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-translations Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.

[Bug 754522] [NEW] autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 autofs does not start, if no nfs-mount is in fstab. Breaks autofs mounted user homes. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: autofs 5.0.5-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-server 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux

[Bug 754522] Re: autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Schweikle
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754522 Title: autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 658023] Re: registration token computed incorrectly

2011-04-08 Thread Peter Matulis
This bug is present in Ubuntu 10.10 and is fixed by eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4.2+lp658023 in the following PPA: https://launchpad.net/~davewalker/+archive/uec-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus

[Bug 749402] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-08 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Bug 752298] Re: package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-08 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Bug 754522] Re: autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Partly because after upgrading grub the old /boot/grub/grub.cfg is removed, then grub-install called. Leading to grub installed without loading /boot/grub/grub.cfg. Solution: reinstall grub by issuing command grub-install dev. The installation script will have to call grub-install dev *after*

[Bug 754522] Re: autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Schweikle
The unknown commands in file /boot/grub/grub.cfg are ignored by grub. They are setting background and foreground color. This has changed in grub lately. update-grub should be fixed to use the new syntax. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 754522] Re: autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Workaround: - after Upgrading *do not allow the upgrade routine to reboot!!* (press 'N'). - find your boot device, then execute grub-install dev - reboot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 754522] Re: autofs not starting if no nfs-mount in fstab

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Sry! Messed up two bugs. Removing required mounted TYPE=nfs makes the whole thing work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754522 Title: autofs not starting if no

[Bug 644489] Re: constantly changes /dev/disk/by-id/{scsi, wwn}-* LUN symlinks with multipathing

2011-04-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
Please run multipathd with '-v4', and after a few events post /var/log/daemon.log. This should have some very useful info. I'd also be curious to see what /sbin/mpath_prio_netapp /dev/n gives you for a valid n. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 711587] Re: powernap and Eucalyptus seem unable to reach an understanding

2011-04-08 Thread Andres Rodriguez
Marking this as Fix released, as Eucalyptus is now shipping a config file for PowerNap which will ensure that they all work together correctly per recent PowerNap changes. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 726769] Re: package eucalyptus-common 2.0.1 bzr1255-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-08 Thread Andres Rodriguez
Re-opening this bug report as it wasn't really closed. There was a mis- reference in the changelog that caused this. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 754699] [NEW] Eucalyptus node (nc) fails to install, when done from PackageInstall

2011-04-08 Thread Dave Walker
Public bug reported: Setting up eucalyptus-common (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3) ... Warning: The home dir /var/lib/eucalyptus you specified already exists. Adding system user `eucalyptus' (UID 107) ... Adding new group `eucalyptus' (GID 117) ... Adding new user `eucalyptus' (UID 107) with group

[Bug 754699] Re: Eucalyptus node (nc) fails to install, when done from PackageInstall

2011-04-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754699 Title: Eucalyptus node (nc) fails to install, when done

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-04-08 Thread gollum53
Hi, the proposed solution (patched sendsigs, libvirt-bin.conf, omit-kvm-vm-pids) still does not work for me. I have done several tests with sendsigs and found out that the corresponding pids of running virtuals are successfully included in the omitpids array in sendsigs. Hovever, the virtuals

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-04-08 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Fix for libreoffice and libreoffice-l10n commited as: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg- openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commit;h=fa30810e24fa95e212a643a4722a5aec6b040335 ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Assignee:

[Bug 694029] Re: [natty] kvm guests become unstable after a while

2011-04-08 Thread Kees Cook
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694029 Title: [natty] kvm guests become unstable after a while --

[Bug 734777] Re: cannot acquire state change lock problems

2011-04-08 Thread olx69
same here. I test at this time lxc. I've mounted cgroup to /cgroups by 'mount none -t cgroup /cgroup'. virt-manager/libvirt did work before mounting until this time -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.

[Bug 734777] Re: cannot acquire state change lock problems

2011-04-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
@olx69 - I don't that is related. Please open a new bug for your issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734777 Title: cannot acquire state change lock problems --

[Bug 747090] Re: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu)

2011-04-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
With this kernel patch applied, the problem appears solved for me. I did first try my hand at a 'proper' fix, in two different ways, but failed. The patch probably won't apply 100% cleanly, but only because two of the lines being removed have changed. Ignore that and make the patch apply. **

Re: [Bug 747090] Re: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu)

2011-04-08 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Serge, are you working this upstream through the kvm development mailing list, too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747090 Title: wrong return address sometimes

Re: [Bug 747090] Re: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu)

2011-04-08 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Oh, and nice work on the patch, by the way :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747090 Title: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu) --

Re: [Bug 747090] Re: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu)

2011-04-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dustin Kirkland (dustin.kirkl...@gmail.com): Serge, are you working this upstream through the kvm development mailing list, too? I've sent an email to KVM mailing list k...@vger.kernel.org http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg52279.html but no responses yet. -- You received this

[Bug 747090] Re: wrong return address sometimes pushed for INT in kvm (not qemu)

2011-04-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
A cleaned up patch which applies to uptodate linux-2.6 HEAD. ** Patch added: 0001-Remove-emulate_int_real.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/747090/+attachment/2003068/+files/0001-Remove-emulate_int_real.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 644489] Re: constantly changes /dev/disk/by-id/{scsi, wwn}-* LUN symlinks with multipathing

2011-04-08 Thread John Morrissey
-tools/+bug/644489/+attachment/2003108/+files/multipathd.20110408 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644489 Title: constantly changes /dev/disk/by-id/{scsi,wwn}-* LUN

[Bug 644489] Re: constantly changes /dev/disk/by-id/{scsi, wwn}-* LUN symlinks with multipathing

2011-04-08 Thread John Morrissey
I should also note that the errant behavior has changed a little since we first observed it; events used to be generated constantly, but now there are large bursts every ~20s. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to