[Bug 1680224] Re: auto.smb fails on Windows administrative shares

2020-04-15 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Based on case history, to fully address this to all still supported Ubuntu releases: autofs | 5.1.2-1ubuntu3 | bionic | autofs | 5.1.2-1ubuntu3.1 | bionic-updates | autofs | 5.1.2-4ubuntu2 | disco | autofs | 5.1.5-1ubuntu1 | eoan| autofs | 5.1.6-2

[Bug 1680224] Re: auto.smb fails on Windows administrative shares

2020-04-15 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Also affects: autofs (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: autofs (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New =>

[Bug 1827253] Re: [apparmor] missing 'mr' on binary for usage on containers

2020-04-15 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Simon, Could you please help identifying the current status of this bug ? Your original merge requests were postponed to the next SRU for rsyslog in Bionic, Disco and Eoan, correct ? During verification time you discovered the difference between "bin" and "sbin" for the apparmor rule, is that it

[Bug 1827253] Re: [apparmor] missing 'mr' on binary for usage on containers

2020-04-15 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Marking as Fix Released for Disco: +rsyslog (8.32.0-1ubuntu7.1) disco; urgency=medium + + [ Simon Deziel ] + * d/usr.sbin.rsyslogd: allow reading/mmap'ing rsyslog binary +This is required for usage inside containers (LP: #1827253) + + -- Christian Ehrhardt Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:53:03 +0200

[Bug 1872546] Re: ipmi-oem dell reset-power-consumption-data , timezones, and reporting peak amp times in the future

2020-04-15 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. user@box:~$ date Mon Apr 13 17:11:35 EDT 2020 "box" machine -> Apr 13 17:11 EDT user@box:~$ ./reset-power-consumption-meter + sudo ipmi-oem dell reset-power-consumption-data

[Bug 1873046] Re: DNS rebinding protection is ineffective when BIND is configured as a forwarding DNS server

2020-04-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: This affects focal which is at 9.16.1 at the moment. Upstream MP: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc- projects/bind9/-/merge_requests/3343 - Upstream released 9.16.2 with the fix, and of course other changes. + Upstream released 9.16.2[1] with the fix, and of course

[Bug 1873046] [NEW] DNS rebinding protection is ineffective when BIND is configured as a forwarding DNS server

2020-04-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: This affects focal which is at 9.16.1 at the moment. Upstream MP: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc- projects/bind9/-/merge_requests/3343 Upstream released 9.16.2 with the fix, and of course other changes. ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New