** Attachment added: dmesg.new1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/930285/+attachment/2730052/+files/dmesg.new1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930285
** Attachment added: kern.log.new1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/930285/+attachment/2730053/+files/kern.log.new1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
host:
Feb 10 22:50:10 relay1 kernel: 429.615 pa00:40.:c ff806020hschc odto:ukontp:Sne
x,AC x0 SQ x,Rtrigrsl:02 m=8 80 00 00 00 00 00 0c0]4[687685.535651] hpsa
:04:00.0: cp 880036d0 has check condition: unknown type: Sense:
0x5, ASC: 0x20, ASCQ: 0x0, Returning result: 0x2, cmd=[85
sorry
lxc-create -n sbc -t oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930285
Title:
lxc hpsa driver
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Attachment added: test-dmesg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/930285/+attachment/2731012/+files/test-dmesg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930285
** Attachment added: test-kern.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/930285/+attachment/2731013/+files/test-kern.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: test-syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/930285/+attachment/2731014/+files/test-syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930285
i still get this error. see attached files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930285
Title:
lxc hpsa driver
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
host:
Feb 11 10:36:44 relay1 kernel: [729997.419244] hpsa :04:00.0: cp
880036d00a00 has check condition: unknown type:
Sense: 0x5, ASC: 0x20, ASCQ: 0x0, Returning result: 0x2, cmd=[85 08 0e 00 00
00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 ec 00]
--
You received this bug notification because you are
A Samba update on 30/1/12 has resolved this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911642
Title:
system-config-printer.py crashed with SIGSEGV in
** Tags removed: kernel-request-3.2.0-10.17 kernel-request-3.2.0-10.18
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
@serge -- if this is going to be fixed using an apparmour policy should
we be flipping the kernel task over to apparmor ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917660
Title:
Still a problem for me in oneiric 11.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
Title:
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
To manage
Apologies - mine seems to be a different problem - I am not using
--addpkg ubuntu-desktop but I am getting a similar error message:
VMBuilder.exception.VMBuilderException: Process (['umount',
'/tmp/tmpTuNycd/dev']) returned 1. stdout: , stderr: umount:
/tmp/tmpTuNycd/dev: device is busy.
Apologies for the noise - I think I may be actually seeing bug #726790
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vm-builder/+bug/726790
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu.
I was having the same problem, and Taco's fix worked for me too. Note I
needed to edit the dapper.py file even though I was creating a lucid VM.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu.
: High
Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw)
Status: Fix Committed
** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Medium
Status: Invalid
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided = High
Patch for Oneiric
** Patch added:
0001-oneiric-overlayfs-apply-device-cgroup-and-security-permissio.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/915941/+attachment/2680825/+files/0001-oneiric-overlayfs-apply-device-cgroup-and-security-permissio.patch
--
You received this bug
** No longer affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug
** Project changed: launchpad = linux
** No longer affects: linux
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Andy Whitcroft (apw
Proposed patch for Precise
** Patch added:
0001-overlayfs-apply-device-cgroup-and-security-permissio.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/915941/+attachment/2679341/+files/0001-overlayfs-apply-device-cgroup-and-security-permissio.patch
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915941
Title:
overlayfs does not honor lxc-related permissions
To manage
I have built some Precise test kernels with the proposed fix applied.
If you could test those and report any results here. Kernels can be
found here:
http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp915941-precise/
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
Title:
[SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.5
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: eucalyptus/1.6
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
Have started a thread upstream to discuss this change.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817187
Title:
change in readlink() errno in 2.6.39 and later kernels causes
This is a notty one. The behavour has indeed changed, ENOENT was the
previous return and now we return EINVAL. I do not have a POSIX manual
to hand, but the gist of the restriction is as below:
Empty pathname
In the original Unix, the empty pathname referred to the current
A quick review of other syscalls reacting to as a pathname tend to
now place readlink as an inconsistant outsider:
open(, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
chmod(, 0777) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
readlink(,
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Andy Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) = Andy Whitcroft
(apw)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
I don't agree that this is not a bug; as Michael pointed out there are
log file processors like fail2ban which can't tell the difference
between an auth failure from this and an auth failure from a guess.
It could possibly be worked around in the logging daemon or in every
package that consumes
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
asdf
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Andy Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747090
Title:
wrong return address sometimes
@Serge -- I have pulled down the patch (and applied Jan's changes), and
applied the patch to a Natty kernel for testing. If you could just
verify the kernels at the URL for me, I can get the patch out for
review. Kernels are here:
http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp747090-natty/
Thanks!
**
@serge -- have we heard anything further from upstream. The thread you
started seems quiet. I suspect we need to debug this more before they
are going to react.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
userlist_deny
This option is examined if userlist_enable is activated. If you set this
setting to NO, then users will be denied login unless they are
explicitly listed in the file specified by userlist_file. When login is
denied, the denial is issued before the user is asked for a password.
This is something you should bring up to the VSFTPD development team as
this is not an Ubuntu bug. A VSFTPD mailing list perhaps, or an e-mail
to a project code contributor would be appropriate for your concerns.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
** Changed in: vsftpd (Debian)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672328
Is your userlist_deny=NO/YES set. Could this be missing or commented
out in your configuration? Also, is your local_enable= variable set?
The security advisory only addresses disclosure of valid users and does
not allow password-less logins. I am sure a patched security update
will be provided
This does not allow for non password user authentication. The security,
or rather bug in question allows for brute force user name disclosure
and therefor a new bug report should be made and this ticket closed as
this description states falsely that causes the system to skip asking
for a password
I also want to take notice to the issue date of the vulnerability:
Updated: Jul 6 2008
Original Entry Date: Jan 7 2004
I changed the ticket status to 'invalid' and it should be closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
I'm getting this problem too. Here's the stacktrace to the SIGSEGV:
$ sudo gdb /usr/sbin/nagios3 /etc/nagios3/nagios.cfg
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-ubuntu
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software:
WORKAROUND: As this appears to be happening during the update check
(http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/configmain.html#check_for_updates),
I switched it off on nagios.cfg
check_for_updates=0
After this, I restarted, and it all works fine again (although I get a
warning about update checks
An SRU for Hardy would be very nice to have. Is there anything I can do
to help?
--
open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from
Spamassassin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
Does anyone know what Canonical's *official* position on shutting down KVM VMs
on host shutdown with Upstart?
Does Canonical run Ubuntu 10.04 Server with KVM in production?
Do they shutdown VMs? How did this slip by for an LTS release?
Is this up to their standards as Production Quality?
Do
Update**
In my comment #38 above step (2) I replaced the following modification in
/etc/init.d/sendsigs from.
while /bin/ls /var/run/libvirt/qemu/*.pid/dev/null 21 [
$kvm_shutdown_timeout -gt 0 ]
with:
while /usr/bin/pgrep -cx kvm /dev/null 21 [ $kvm_shutdown_timeout
-gt 0 ]
I have
Reinhard, to answer you questions.
I created the init script first before I ran into this problem
The reason being was 1) to minimize modification of system files and 2) to be
able to shutdown guests on non-upstart versions of Linux. and 3) to enable
stopping all guests manually without
Ok I create a pre-stop script in /etc/init/libvirt-bin.conf
and it is running the script however its not waiting for the script to
complete.Everything shutsdown extremely fast in about 3 seconds and I am
back to the BIOS screen.
So the it starts shutting down the guest os but the host
Ok so I came up with a workaround that seems to be working for me. The
guests shutdown completely. Not sure what this breaks if anything.
There still needs to be a permanent fix for this bug but here is what I
did.
(1)
Edit /etc/init/libvirt-bin.conf
I added this under the pre-start script
So does this mean that KVM is not properly supported on Ubuntu 10.04
Server LTS? The ability to automatically shutdown VMs when someone logs
into a production host server and types /sbin/shutdown does not exist on
a server operating sytstem flagged LTS that is supposed to be for
production?
00 00 0C 00 00
00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..|.
# kpartx -d /dev/loop0; losetup -d /dev/loop0
I changed location 0x1a to 0xFF on one or other or both partitions and
it still will not boot in virt-manager.
Cheers,
Andy.
--
Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot
https
Andreas,
The program that created the disk image seems confused, but it worked for
creating a VM for FC11.
Windows install seems to run fine, until wanting to boot from the drive it
created.
I don't know what creates the drive image and geometry, but it is broken.
I think this is what I used
Is this going to be fixed?
--
Lucid qemu-kvm: ksmd default config is CPU hog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578930
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
will this be fixed in lucid?
--
virt-manager fails if target system uses tcsh as root shell
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
kernel stacktrace on volume detach in kvm guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458201
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
--
The patches which triggered this issue have been backed out for beta-1.
The additional patch to fix the issue is now known. The combination
will be applied and tested together to avoid a recurrence. This will
happen after bete-1.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress =
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 = ubuntu-10.04-beta-2
** Summary changed:
- Can't boot initramfses
+ versatile: Can't boot initramfses
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Triaged
--
versatile: Can't boot initramfses
Don't know about Lucid - I know that reinstalling XP onto a virtio device
worked.
So Win XP on vda is ok, on hda it's not ok.
--
XP guest installs but gives BSoD on reboot unless in safe mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Iam really disappointed that this also has not been classed as a bug buy the
server team.
from going from a simply configuration on my fstab of between Januty Karnic.
//server/mnt /mnt/mountpoint cifs guest 0 0
to
//server/mnt /mnt/mountpointcifs
** Also affects: server-papercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
2.6.31 - Can't see files in CIFS-mounted directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
** Tags added: lucid
--
drbd8-utils not dependent on drbd8-source
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474660
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I have this problem in Karmic, with either XP or Ubuntu as guest. I
removed the sound device from the guest (which was es1370) but the
problem remains.
--
Sound dies on amd64 with WinXP guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248628
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = samba (Ubuntu)
--
Cifs mount fails when DFS referrals are used by server, keyutils needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
** Tags added: kernel-series-unknown
--
Can't read temperature with i2c_i801 anymore
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
As this is an element in the configuration file delivered by dhcp3 it
seems appropriate to start diagnosis of this there.
** Tags added: kernel-karmic
** Tags removed: kernel-series-unknown
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
--
interface-mtu kills my network connection
now when iam doing a sync between our remote sites with
exactually the same setup instead of 10 sites taking 20 minutes to be
checked this is now taking over an hour using rsync.
Can anyone help me speed this backup? They are all NAS boxes with no
permissions a Buffalo Drivestation.
Thanks
Andy
Performing a fresh install. I installed from a CD containing XP SP2, then
applied SP3, then applied all updates via Windows Update.
Then I installed Microsoft Security Essentials - the free anti-virus from
Microsoft, at this point the error appeared.
All attempts to rectify the situation failed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kvm
Ubuntu Karmic, i386 with XP Professional guest.
Started via virt-manager, command line (from /proc/process/cmdline :
/usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.11 -m 1024 -smp 1 -name detritus -uuid
f5d12c79-f2df-9a9c-400a-c6948fd0a1ba -monitor
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
Running karmic as virtual machine with virtio hard disk outputs I/O errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420423
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Proposing for inclusion in the karmic release kernel.
--
Running karmic as virtual machine with virtio hard disk outputs I/O errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420423
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
I don't see the original config file attached here, so I attach (see
line 847). another dump of the current dovecot settings (which doesn't
tell me the exact release 1.1.1.XXX )
My current deb version is '1:1.1.11-0ubuntu4', which according to
I'm seeing problems with the new version.
Tests with either SSH or sudo, my first password attempt is rejected, yet the
second attempt succeeds.
I get this in the logs:
pam_ldap: ldap_starttls_s: Connect error
Setting tls_checkpeer to no in /etc/ldap.conf makes things work fine
again.
I am using a self created CA with certificates signed by it.
I used this command to create it:
openssl req -config openssl.cnf -new -x509 -extensions v3_ca -keyout
physicsCA/private/cakey.pem -out physicsCA/cacert.pem -days 2190
I create and sign the certificates with these commands:
openssl
Attaching my openssl.cnf
** Attachment added: openssl.cnf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28850996/openssl.cnf
--
gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
+1
I just spent quite some time trying to figure this out, and only now
happened upon this bug report.
--
Forced bind to 127.0.0.1 is hardcoded' into /etc/default/snmpd instead of
option in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74896
You received this bug notification because
I removed my .ssh directory re-imported my keys from another machine. I'll
re-create the known-hosts as and when I need to connect to other servers.
Problem has now disappeared.
--
ssh-add: Error reading response length from authentication socket.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356793
You
Please provide details of your actual system setup, your configuration files
etc.
This could be just a misconfiguration.
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
OpenVPN client does not recognize WLAN connections
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347788
You received
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: slapd
Using Intrepid Ubuntu 8.10, slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6
Steps to reproduce bug :-
* Take a properly constituted ldap database, with an index on uid - index uid
eq and containing user fred
* stop slapd - /etc/init.d/slapd stop
* Remove index uid eq
You are not alone!
I just (unwillingly *sigh*) reproduced the bug here on my workstation
(Ubuntu 8.10, 32bit, with all available updates) and a NetApp share.
The first ls showed only 148 of the available 288 files in a directory.
After some more ls (or cp) the kernel crashed.
Andy.
--
System
mounted in /etc/fstab from mounting,
as they stopped being able to be resolved (despite being on the same
server as the one I was having trouble manualy mounting).
Anyway, thanks Steve
Andy
--
Connect to smb server by name doesn't work, but by IP address does
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235560
201 - 288 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
