[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-27 Thread Bfreis
Hello. Just to inform that since yesterday after when I updated to the latest version available on natty-proposed the servers are running good, and have shown no symptoms of messages from the future being discarded (verified through the absence of the error logs I was seeing in

[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-26 Thread Bfreis
Hello. I've just installed the update from natty-proposed on my 3 servers (2 NCs, 1 CC), and they seem to be fine. I will confirm if everything is still OK tomorrow, since the errors were intermittent. It is the first time I use -proposed, so I have a question: if everything goes smooth, and you

[Bug 854946] [NEW] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-20 Thread Bfreis
Public bug reported: In both EucalyptusNC/services.xml and EucalyptusCC/services.xml there's no ClockSkewBuffer (nor TimeToLive nor PrecisionInMilliseconds), therefore messages from the future (from the webservice's point of view) won't be accepted, even if the difference in time is minimal.