[Bug 677161] Re: tunnelled clear text passwords

2010-11-18 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. If I understand you correctly, you are worried about a clear-text (i.e., non-encrypted) passphrase being sent by the SSH client, and that anyone will be able to sniff the channel and grab it. Please rest assured this is not the case:

[Bug 661547] Re: Existing patch gssapi.diff makes guess_service_principal produce garbage

2010-11-18 Thread C de-Avillez
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Existing patch gssapi.diff makes guess_service_principal produce garbage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is su

[Bug 627174] Re: SRU: package drbd8-utils (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cluster/drbd.sh', which is also in package rgmanager 0:3.0.2-2ubuntu3

2010-10-22 Thread C de-Avillez
Marked 'verification-done' per Andres' comment above. -- SRU: package drbd8-utils (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cluster/drbd.sh', which is also in package rgmanager 0:3.0.2-2ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627174 You received this bug notific

[Bug 618916] Re: attach-interface only works every other time

2010-10-21 Thread C de-Avillez
** Tags added: regression-release ** Tags removed: regression-potential -- attach-interface only works every other time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618916 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-s

[Bug 657385] Re: mysql failed to configure while upgrading to 10.04

2010-10-14 Thread C de-Avillez
Closing the mythubuntu task as well. ** Changed in: mythbuntu Status: New => Invalid -- mysql failed to configure while upgrading to 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql

[Bug 657385] Re: mysql failed to configure while upgrading to 10.04

2010-10-14 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for your feedback. As such, I am closing this bug. Please do report any new issues you find. ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- mysql failed to configure while upgrading to 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657385 You received this bug no

[Bug 660055] Re: instances gets public ip address after disassociate-address

2010-10-13 Thread C de-Avillez
Hi Torsten If you do not mind, what Euca version? ;-) ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- instances gets public ip address after disassociate-address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu S

[Bug 610987] Re: euca-describe-availability-zones output is a hint, not totally accurate - and should be documented

2010-10-13 Thread C de-Avillez
There is something that has been bothering me for a while now: e-d-a-z verbose may be a "hint of what is the availability, but not necessarily current". That's OK, any measures on a dynamic system are by definition outdated at the moment of measurement. The point is 'e-d-a-z verbose' should behave

[Bug 601717] Re: euca-describe-volumes execution time increases with number of volumes

2010-10-13 Thread C de-Avillez
Marking fix released for Eucalyptus 2.0 on Maverick. There is a _slight_ increase in processing times, but non-significant. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- euca-describe-volumes execution time increases with number of volumes https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 657972] Re: Panic or segfault in Samba

2010-10-10 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, there is nothing we can do until we actually know what happened. You can try to add more data here by running ´apport-collect 657972', which will attach a series of logs to this bug. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Imp

[Bug 656973] Re: Samba configuration window is disabled and cannot enable it

2010-10-09 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we can't fix it because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html.

[Bug 656527] Re: net usersidlist on a newly-installed samba server crashes with SIGSEGV

2010-10-07 Thread C de-Avillez
Sigh. It seems I will have to reboot to get the report here :-( -- net usersidlist on a newly-installed samba server crashes with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656527 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubunt

[Bug 656527] [NEW] net usersidlist on a newly-installed samba server crashes with SIGSEGV

2010-10-07 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba ISO testing, testing i386 server image -- Samba test. When I run 'net usersidlist' I get this output: CHECKBOX\nobody S-1-5-21-2266484315-1315366848-732043401-501 S-1-1-0 S-1-5-2 S-1-5-11 (NULL SID) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Will add

[Bug 613514] Re: maverick i386 UEC: Instance does not start

2010-10-06 Thread C de-Avillez
It was an issue on libvirt (missing an include, IIRC), and Jamie fixed it about 2 weeks ago. -- maverick i386 UEC: Instance does not start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in

[Bug 586888] Re: euca_conf register-nodes Cannot find source keys directory

2010-10-05 Thread C de-Avillez
invalidating upstream eucalyptus for now -- I wrongly set it to upstream. ** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca_conf register-nodes Cannot find source keys directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586888 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 655220] Re: Bacula Installation Failure

2010-10-05 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 321091 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321091 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 321091, so it is being marked as such. Please look at

[Bug 648120] Re: Squid doesn't start at boot

2010-10-05 Thread C de-Avillez
squid (2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5) maverick; urgency=low * debian/squid.upstart: correct 'local-filesystem' to 'local-filesystems'. Missing 's' at the end causes squid to fail to start on boot. Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:27:09 -0500 Changed-By: C de-Avillez Main

[Bug 654574] Re: qrunner crashed with IOError in _logexc()

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
** Visibility changed to: Public -- qrunner crashed with IOError in _logexc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654574 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mailman in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 653775] Re: other computers can't find my shared files

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
Heh. SMB config is already in, saw it 1 second after hitting enter on the previous comment... ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- other computers can't find my shared files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 653775] Re: other computers can't find my shared files

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Can you please attach: * the content of the /etc/samba/smb.conf file * log files found in /var/log/samba/ * the output of the smbclient -L //server/ * the output of testparm -s -- other computers can't find my shared files https://bu

[Bug 653370] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
The logs show that MySQL was being configured at the moment you cancelled the upgrade -- so this does not seem to be an apparmour issue. OTOH, I agree that config changes should be more carefully screened. I am just not sure, right now, on how to do it. -- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu

[Bug 654249] Re: libnss-ldap create troubles in gnome session when ldap server is unreacheable

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
@Id2ndR: can you please attach here the contents of you ~/.xsession- errors and /var/log/gdm/* when you try to login disconnected? Thank you. -- libnss-ldap create troubles in gnome session when ldap server is unreacheable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654249 You received this bug notification

[Bug 653370] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
I see this, in the daemon log: Oct 1 20:45:42 linux1 mysqld[28442]: 101001 20:45:42 [ERROR] /usr/sbin/mysqld: unknown option '--skip-bdb' Oct 1 20:45:42 linux1 mysqld[28442]: 101001 20:45:42 [ERROR] Aborting Oct 1 20:45:42 linux1 mysqld[28442]: Oct 1 20:45:42 linux1 mysqld[28442]: 101001 20:

[Bug 653370] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
Duh. It is a hang... I apologise. Looking at the logs now. ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653370 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 653370] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. From the DistUpgradeTermLog: Installing new version of config file /etc/logrotate.d/mysql-server ... Warning: found usr.sbin.mysqld in /etc/apparmor.d/force-complain, forcing complain mode ^C ^Cdpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.1

[Bug 654249] Re: libnss-ldap create troubles in gnome session when ldap server is unreacheable

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
I am marking the libnss-ldap task Incomplete/Low, waiting for feedback from the desktop folks. I expect it to be eventually set to invalid, though. ** Changed in: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- libnss-

[Bug 654249] Re: libnss-ldap create troubles in gnome session when ldap server is unreacheable

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for reporting this bug and helping make Ubuntu better -- and thank you very much for the research on the workaround. I have added a GDM task, and opened a Gnome bug on for it (and linked it here). This does not sound as much as a libnss-ldap issue as a GDM issue. ** Also affects: gdm (Ub

[Bug 652815] Re: eucalyptus-common 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 not configured after package upgrade

2010-10-04 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Given what you found, I am closing this bug as invalid (not a bug). For the IFACE issue, please open a new bug -- we cannot track multiple issues in one bug. Thank you. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid

[Bug 651182] Re: Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances

2010-10-01 Thread C de-Avillez
Marking Triaged, we already have the upstream bug courtesy of Andrea. ** Changed in: mailman (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651182 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 651432] Re: package bacula-director-mysql 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install

2010-09-30 Thread C de-Avillez
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- package bacula-director-mysql 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 651182] Re: Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances

2010-09-30 Thread C de-Avillez
Marking Confirmed/Low; todo: add upstream bug link ** Changed in: mailman (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 647647] Re: postmap -u segfaults

2010-09-28 Thread C de-Avillez
Sigh. Had to build postfix with debug data, it seems standard build does not do it. Anyway, here it is -- I ran it providing a bad parameter to -u: cer...@xango2:/build/buildd/postfix$ sudo gdb --args postmap -u NOTHING GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-ubuntu Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Lic

[Bug 649423] Re: package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script pos t-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 629234 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629234 >From the DpkgTerminalLog: Dépaquetage de vsftpd (à partir de .../vsftpd_2.2.2-3ubuntu6_amd64.deb) ... Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « man-db »... Traitement des actions différées (« tr

[Bug 648527] Re: continuance from password changer .Bug 647912

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Unfortonately, I cannot make sense of your issue. Can you please explain what is the problem? ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- continua

[Bug 648228] Re: boot ordering broken: does not try next boot device

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Hi Reinhard, What version of the packages are you running? Also can you attach the XML for the VM? ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- boot ordering broken: does not try next boot device https:

[Bug 648604] Re: package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, 'none' does not help us: we would like to know how the update started, and where the new packages would be. I can see a lot of errors relating to CDROM 280 seconds or so after boot, but I do not know if they are related.

[Bug 647873] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 621837 package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de

[Bug 647785] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I am unsure on what is going on. Your apt-get's term.log shows a *LOT* of packages that seem to have been incorrectly removed (there are references to them, but dpkg cannot find any descriptions of the packages. So, I wonder if what yo

[Bug 647647] Re: postmap -u segfaults

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I am assuming you ran postmap, not postfix as in the description. I can repeat it on Maverick, AMD64; I will collect a backtrace in a few. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu

[Bug 647195] Re: Package Manager freezes while " Entpacke Ersatz für libwbclient0"

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I am sorry, but there is not enough data to work on this bug. Please provide: 1. your /var/log/apt/term.log showing the issue; 2. after a few seconds, run a ps -aux | grep root so that we can see what is running. ** Changed in: samba

[Bug 647038] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 621837 package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de

[Bug 648404] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 621837 package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de

[Bug 648202] Re: vsftpd started even if not in standalone mode

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Confirmed on Maverick, could not check Lucid. Some details: 1. it seems it is 'exit 0' that causes fast respawning: after I corrected the '!egrep' syntax, I still got the fast respawn (now check_standalone_mode returns 0, and the 'or' clause is executed). 2. with both lines changed as suggested,

[Bug 648120] Re: Squid doesn't start at boot

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
** Patch added: "debdiff correcting spelling of 'local-filesystems'" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/648120/+attachment/1645097/+files/2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.debdiff -- Squid doesn't start at boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648120 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 648120] Re: Squid doesn't start at boot

2010-09-27 Thread C de-Avillez
Confirmed, created a debdiff (attached) ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Squid doesn't start at boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648120 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 646858] Re: dovecot-postfix and upstart incompatibility

2010-09-26 Thread C de-Avillez
A reboot may be necessary -- this is how I bypassed the issue. I also found that killing dovecot's instances would not end the stop/start threads, and had to kill them also. Killing the stop thread allowed installation to proceed until dovecot was started again (which would hang); killing this star

[Bug 640121] Re: package dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

2010-09-26 Thread C de-Avillez
@RevEggplant: please open a new bug using apport -- we need to see the apt's term.log to verify. -- package dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640121 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 640121] Re: package dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

2010-09-26 Thread C de-Avillez
@(Christopher, RevEggplant): yours are not the same issue as in this bug. -- package dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 647489] Re: package dovecot-postfix 1:1.2.11-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2010-09-26 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 646858 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646858 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 646858 dovecot-postfix and upstart incompatibility * You can subscribe to bug 646858 by following this link: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d

[Bug 647337] Re: upgrade of packages freezes when upgrading dovecot-common

2010-09-26 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 646858 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646858 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 646858 dovecot-postfix and upstart incompatibility * You can subscribe to bug 646858 by following this link: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d

[Bug 644759] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
The attached tar file contains the output of 'openssl x509 -text' for certificates for a NC (santol): node-certs-after-register.txt: certificates after a euca_conf --deregister/register node-certs-after-upgrade.txt: certificates after the upgrade node-certs-before-upgrade.txt: certificates in th

[Bug 646100] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
logs pushed to lp:~hggdh2/%2Bjunk/uec-qa/ Pushed up to revision 62. -- After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 644759] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
logs uploaded to lp:~hggdh2/%2Bjunk/uec-qa/ Pushed up to revision 62. -- After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in

[Bug 644759] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
from the cc.log: [Thu Sep 23 14:43:12 2010][014472][EUCAINFO ] refresh_resources(): called [Thu Sep 23 14:43:12 2010][014472][EUCADEBUG ] ncClientCall(ncDescribeResource): called ncURL=http://10.55.55.5:8775/axis2/services/EucalyptusNC timeout=20 [Thu Sep 23 14:43:12 2010][027693][EUCADEBUG ] D

[Bug 644733] Re: On upgrade from Lucid to Maverick CC entries in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.local.conf are commented out

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- On upgrade from Lucid to Maverick CC entries in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.local.conf are commented out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server T

[Bug 644759] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus

[Bug 646100] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
** Attachment added: "ls -lR of /var/lib/eucalyptus after upgrade" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/646100/+attachment/1627930/+files/maverick_after_upgrade.txt ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Also affects: eucalyptus Im

[Bug 646100] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
** Attachment added: "ls -lR of /var/lib/eucalyptus before upgrade" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/646100/+attachment/1627929/+files/lucid_after_image_registered.txt -- After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded https:/

[Bug 646100] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
2. the (single) image I had registered and successfully used on Lucid is not shown anymore on 'euca-describe-images'. The files are there, though (see attachments with 'ls -lR /var/lib/eucalyptus'). -- After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded https://bug

[Bug 646100] Re: After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
1. the admin credentials changed: ubu...@cempedak:~$ cat eucarc EUCA_KEY_DIR=$(dirname $(readlink -f ${BASH_SOURCE})) export S3_URL=http://10.55.55.2:8773/services/Walrus export EC2_URL=http://10.55.55.2:8773/services/Eucalyptus export EC2_PRIVATE_KEY=${EUCA_KEY_DIR}/euca2-admin-2cabb318-pk.pem ex

[Bug 646100] [NEW] After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, Eucalyptus database seems not to have been upgraded

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: This is currently a placeholder while I re-run the upgrade process. Basically: 1. images are lost (not yet known if still on disc) 2. admin credentials must be refreshed (sudo euca_conf --get-credentials must be re-run). During a conference call, Dmitrii suggested this migh

[Bug 645745] Re: Some package dependency should be moved to puppet

2010-09-23 Thread C de-Avillez
Marking Triaged/Low per James' request. ** Changed in: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: puppet (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- Some package dependency should be moved to puppet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645745 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 643100] Re: Recent update broke dhcp

2010-09-22 Thread C de-Avillez
Yes, I think your network-manager is a left-over from your Karmic days -- you installed it from an external repository (probably a PPA), but... * it has a greater version than current Lucid * it is most probably not compatible with Lucid This goes with the territory, when using non-official repos

[Bug 642866] Re: openssh client logs into server without specifying the correct key file.

2010-09-21 Thread C de-Avillez
this account 'myself': are you logged in to it, or did you sudo to it? As another exercise, please 'ssh -vvv -i linux_test_server -l username 192.168.1.222'. -- openssh client logs into server without specifying the correct key file. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642866 You received this bug n

[Bug 643100] Re: Recent update broke dhcp

2010-09-21 Thread C de-Avillez
Till, this is weird -- it looks more and more that either you did not make a successful upgrade to Lucid, or that you have some incorrect package repositories in place. The official network-manager for Lucid is 0.8-0ubuntu3 -- you are running 0.8-0ubuntu5~nmt5~karmic! Both wrong Ubuntu version and

[Bug 644759] [NEW] After upgrade Lucid->Maverick, all nodes need to be re-registered

2010-09-21 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: Upgraded first the CLC/CC/SC/Walrus (all-in-one topology). Then upgraded 3 NCs. This is what happened: ubu...@cempedak:~/uec-testing-scripts$ euca-describe-availability-zones verbose AVAILABILITYZONEUEC-TEST1 10.55.55.2 AVAILABILITYZONE|- vm types fr

[Bug 644733] [NEW] On upgrade from Lucid to Maverick CC entries in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.local.conf are commented out

2010-09-21 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: At the end of an upgrade Lucid -> Maverick, critical entries on /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.local.conf are commented out, causing Eucalyptus to fail. [Tue Sep 21 17:21:55 2010][003284][EUCADEBUG ] init_config(): initializing CC configuration [Tue Sep 21 17:21:55 2010][003284]

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-21 Thread C de-Avillez
Oh, forgot: this is a i386 install of Maverick. -- Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubun

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-21 Thread C de-Avillez
On a i386 test upgrade from 10.04 to Maverick I also got this error. All instances fail to start. Full logs at lp:~hggdh2/+junk/uec-qa, revision 61. -- Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628055 You received this bu

[Bug 643100] Re: Recent update broke dhcp

2010-09-20 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you. Now, there are some problems on these DHCP packages: (1) they are for Kamic (or so the version string says); (2) they are non-official packages (isc-dhcp-* is not provided by us) How did you get them? This, unfortunately, does not seem to be a bug (you are using non-official packages).

[Bug 643100] Re: Recent update broke dhcp

2010-09-20 Thread C de-Avillez
You should have the logs under /var/log/apt/ -- if you have just updated, it should be the current term.log. Also, it would be insteresting to look at the history.log. -- Recent update broke dhcp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643100 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 641519] Re: samba install hangs in 'samba.postinst configure'

2010-09-20 Thread C de-Avillez
Actually, since you report your issue has been resolved, I will go ahead and close this bug INVALID. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- samba install hangs in 'samba.postinst configure' https://bugs

[Bug 641519] Re: samba install hangs in 'samba.postinst configure'

2010-09-20 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we can't fix it because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html.

[Bug 643477] Re: package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

2010-09-20 Thread C de-Avillez
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately your dpkg term log does not show what happened with nmap -- nmap is only referenced at the end of the log, stating dpkg operations on it failed. Can you please follow the advice given by dpkg -- reinstall, and then try to

[Bug 642866] Re: openssh client logs into server without specifying the correct key file.

2010-09-19 Thread C de-Avillez
I cannot repeat on Maverick; renaming the id_rsa and id_rsa.pub causes SSH to drop to password validation. @Canoblus: some things to try/verify: 1. what happens when you try to open the session as 'ssh -vvv usern...@192.168.1.222'? 2. what happens when you try to open the session as 'ssh -vvv -i

[Bug 160631] Re: scp does not validate existance of file before connecting to remote host

2010-09-18 Thread C de-Avillez
cer...@xango2:/build/buildd/uec/uec-testing-scripts$ scp doesNotExist cempedak.canonical.com:. Warning: Permanently added 'cempedak.canonical.com' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. doesNotExist: No such file or directory cer...@xango2:/build/buildd/uec/uec-testing-scripts$ apt-cache policy opens

[Bug 617982] Re: package eucalyptus-cloud 1.6. 2-0ubuntu30.3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-proce ssus script post-installation installé a retourn é une erreur de sortie d'état 1

2010-09-17 Thread C de-Avillez
Closing INVALID: OP has deactivated launchpad account. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- package eucalyptus-cloud 1.6.2-0ubuntu30.3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 h

[Bug 641657] Re: SSH connections freeze after a period of time

2010-09-17 Thread C de-Avillez
Jeff -- would you be running byobu/screen on this SSH session? I just found that my SSH freezes on Maverick are actually caused by screen being hit with a SIGSEGV (somewhere in libc, still trying to pin it down, not even a core is produced). -- SSH connections freeze after a period of time https:

[Bug 639639] Re: euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-09-17 Thread C de-Avillez
I ran a total of 4,000 instances during the night (logs uploaded to the usual place, revisions 58 and 59). I consider this fix released. -- euca-* commands stopped responding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 639781] Re: [AbstractSystemAddressManager:New I/O client worker #2-10] Found 2 vms with the same address: ClusterAddressInfo 10.55.55.101 172.19.7.131 orphanCount=0 -> i-363305B7(PENDING) i-3DE70

2010-09-17 Thread C de-Avillez
Fixed by eucalyptus 2.0-+bzr1241-0ubuntu1 ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [AbstractSystemAddressManager:New I/O client worker #2-10] Found 2 vms with the same address: ClusterAddressInfo 10.55.55.101 172.19.7.131 orphanCount=0 -> i-363305B7(PEND

[Bug 639639] Re: euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-09-15 Thread C de-Avillez
I was unable to repeat it on a third run; instead, I hit bug 639781 again. I think I should go to a brand new install, and try again. -- euca-* commands stopped responding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, whi

[Bug 639639] Re: euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-09-15 Thread C de-Avillez
I was already running a second try -- I *always* do it, Just In Case ;-) But instead I hit bug 639781. I wonder if this could be same OOM error? Will try again. -- euca-* commands stopped responding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639639 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 639781] [NEW] [AbstractSystemAddressManager:New I/O client worker #2-10] Found 2 vms with the same address: ClusterAddressInfo 10.55.55.101 172.19.7.131 orphanCount=0 -> i-363305B7(PENDING) i-3DE

2010-09-15 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: eucalyptus 2.0+bzr1239-0ubuntu3.2 (in Dave's PPA). This is the second run of a 2,000 instances test. I was trying to reproduce the error on bug 639639 but, instead, got a completely (at least on first glance) error: euca-* commands still run to completion, but most of the ins

[Bug 639639] Re: euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-09-15 Thread C de-Avillez
** Description changed: - Eucalyptus 2.0+brz1239-0ubuntu3 (actually, r1240). + Eucalyptus 2.0+brz1239-0ubuntu3.2 (actually, r1240). After about 1,300 instances started Eucalyptus suddenly stopped responding to euca-* commands. A brief look at the eucalyptus logs show a series of 23:4

[Bug 639639] [NEW] euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-09-15 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: Eucalyptus 2.0+brz1239-0ubuntu3 (actually, r1240). After about 1,300 instances started Eucalyptus suddenly stopped responding to euca-* commands. A brief look at the eucalyptus logs show a series of 23:44:20 DEBUG [AbstractClusterMessageDispatcher:Hashed wheel timer #1] org

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-14 Thread C de-Avillez
Hi Sylvain, Can you please attach the /var/log/eucalyptus of all the machines showing the error? Also, exact sequence of commands and output would help. Thank you. -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5

[Bug 637544] Re: apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
** Attachment added: "sample libvirt.xml" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/637544/+attachment/1580495/+files/libvirt.xml -- apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637544 You received this

[Bug 637659] Re: metadata service returns 500 error

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
logs showing this are at lp:~hggdh2/+junk/uec-qa, revision 55 ** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Critical Status: Confirmed -- metadata service returns 500 error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 637544] Re: apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
Ugh! I am in the middle of a new install, so it will be a while... If it helps any, here's the aa-helper-generated .files (when I set aa-helper to COMPLAIN mode): # # This profile is for the domain whose UUID matches this file. # #include /etc/apparmour.d/libvirt/ libvirt-ff58f570-9915-eaa8-4f

[Bug 637544] Re: apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
Sorry, Jamie, should have really read the messages... should have seen it. loader is a new option, implemented by Scott Moser, to allow arbitrary kernels to load. I will grab the XML. -- apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 637544] Re: apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
** Attachment added: "kern.log" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/637544/+attachment/1579516/+files/kern.log -- apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637544 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 637544] Re: apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/637544/+attachment/1579515/+files/Dependencies.txt -- apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637544 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 637544] [NEW] apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=3343 profile=/usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper

2010-09-13 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: Running on daily ISO 20100913, with Eucalyptus 2.0+brz1239-0ubuntu2. All instances fail to start, and I see this message all around. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: libvirt-bin 0.8.3-1ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-server 2.6.35.4 Unam

[Bug 636101] [NEW] Server ISO 20100911 failed to install eucalyptus -- eucalyptus.udeb failure

2010-09-11 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: While installing the 20100911 ISO AMD64 server image, I get a failure on eucalyptus-udeb: Sep 12 00:35:28 main-menu[621]: INFO: Menu item 'eucalyptus-udeb' selected Sep 12 00:35:28 debconf: --> SETTITLE debian-installer/eucalyptus-udeb/title Sep 12 00:35:28 debconf: <-- 0 OK

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-08 Thread C de-Avillez
I consider this 'verification-done', but will not change the tag until OEM QA run their own tests. Instance run tests results saved: Using saved push location: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~hggdh2/%2Bjunk/uec-qa/ Pushed up to revision 53. -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometim

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-08 Thread C de-Avillez
Cool. I could not see it as an error anyway, but it is good to have your confirmation. And I agree, not critical at all. Thank you, Neil. -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929 You received this bug

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-08 Thread C de-Avillez
Oh, forgot, sorry: logs saved as usual: Using saved push location: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~hggdh2/%2Bjunk/uec-qa/ Pushed up to revision 52. -- [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929 You receiv

[Bug 590929] Re: [SRU] eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands (POC + ENT configs)

2010-09-08 Thread C de-Avillez
As far as volume-creation/deletion goes, it seems to be running like a charm. The only small thing is when deleting volumes cloud-debug.log gets at least one error logged for each volume: 17:29:44 ERROR [SystemUtil:pool-10-thread-4] com.eucalyptus.util.ExecutionException: ///usr/lib/eucalyptus/eu

[Bug 564355] Re: Second euca-run-instance request in same security group causes eucalyptus to remove network assoicated with security group

2010-09-07 Thread C de-Avillez
Marking Incomplete for the Lucid/Eucalyptus task -- we still need the logs, as I and Dmitrri requested earlier on; marking triaged for the Maverick/Eucalyptus task: I have been unable to reproduce it on Maverick, but will keep on trying. Note that this may well be a volume-related issue: I cannot

[Bug 629878] [NEW] /etc/init/eucalyptus.conf not in sync with /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf

2010-09-03 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported: eucalyptus 2.0~r1233-0ubuntu2, may affect eucalyptus 1.6.2 also (not yet verified). * /etc/init/eucalyptus.conf checks for JVM_MEM, but there is no such variable defined on /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf; */etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf defines CLOUD_OPTS as the additional

<    1   2   3   4   5   >