[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-11-30 Thread DrC
OK - but log.smbclient is 618.8 Mb.I have grep-ed it down to show that there is no match in the log for the file names that were not backed up. The upload includes the 200 lines preceding the occurrence of each file that was backed up from the directory in question. If 200 isn't enough I can

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-11-30 Thread DrC
** Attachment added: tgz of info from 27Nov backup http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36269290/27Nov09.tar.gz -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-11-26 Thread DrC
Attached. Cheers - and thanks. Chris ** Attachment added: tgz of test run once with debug level 9 both log files http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36110268/26Nov09.tar.gz -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug

[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address

2009-11-26 Thread DrC
Attached Cheers Chris. ** Attachment added: tgz of test as requested with logs http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36111942/26Nov09.tar.gz -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-11-26 Thread DrC
Oops - I had forgotten there are two threads. The last upload belongs with 437944 - I have posted it there as well so this one can be deleted. I will run the backup with the same log level tomorrow (Friday) assuming I remember... but it really will be really big - there are a lot of files in the

[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address

2009-10-17 Thread DrC
Sorry - I don't know. This is a new backup protocol following two bad experiences with tape mechanisms, so I have only been doing it for a couple of months, and only on this version. If there is still a gutsy box around at work I will try the test script on that next week. Chris -- Samba

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-10-05 Thread DrC
Backup still showing the same problem of Access Denied. There is nothing in /var/log/samba. Smb.conf log level says it is for logging samba server errors, and I'm only using the client. Have I been looking at the wrong config file (I can't see one for smbclient) or is there a log file

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-10-04 Thread DrC
Sorry for the delay - day job intruded. The server event log has nothing near the time in question, and nothing I can relate to Access Denied. No problem with /dev/sda size - except my geriatric amnesia. To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have the server name; name resolution

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-09-28 Thread DrC
Assuming 'this' is the Access Denied issue... I will check the server event log in the morning. The backup concerned is multi-gigabyte and takes nearly five hours. Needless to say it runs overnight. I will run it tomorrow with debug level 3 assuming my aged memory cells remember after work

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-09-27 Thread DrC
The smbclient -L test consistently gives an error message when addressing my server by its IP address. I will open this as a separate bug. To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have an entry for the server. Access by name used a name resolution service. -- Access Denied but TSC

[Bug 437944] [NEW] Samba session request failure when using IP address

2009-09-27 Thread DrC
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba smbclient -L consistently throws session request errors when addressing a Windows2003 server by its IP address. (spawned from Ubuntu bug - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 and attached screenshot for serve details) To check consistency

[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address

2009-09-27 Thread DrC
** Attachment added: SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32542103/SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-09-25 Thread DrC
I routinely use its IP address when accessing this server from my Ubuntu box. Windows, of course, uses DNS or netbios name resolution. I ran the smbclient -L test twice - once in each mode. I did this in a few spare moments at work, and have only just looked in detail at the results. The two

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-09-25 Thread DrC
Oops - My screenshot shows that both TSC and OOo were using the server name. I have probably put HBS_NTserver3 in my hosts file... I will check that also. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 436041] [NEW] Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-09-24 Thread DrC
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba smbclient backup script reports access denied on all files in one folder of a large Server2003 share. Navigate to the offending MS Word file - no problem. Click to open it (with OOo 3.0) and get access denied. (Same message if I load writer and

[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.

2009-09-24 Thread DrC
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing pretty well everything. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32379834/Screenshot-7.png -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 222416] Re: package update-manager 1:0.87.24 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

2008-11-11 Thread DrC
Sorry - I can't say at this distance. The process was a bit stressful, it is several months ago, and the only reliable information is the notes I made at the time, all of which are above. My initial post says it all, really. Sorry I can't add to it. When asked which config to use, I took the

[Bug 209520] Re: SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share

2008-10-29 Thread DrC
re https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/209520/comments/142 8.04 is a lts version. Is the 'won't fix' a long term decision that we hope will be overtaken by upstream developments? -- SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share