[Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2015-05-12 Thread Forest
Here's a first attempt: https://github.com/lxc/lxc-pkg-ubuntu/pull/2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389954 Title: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover

[Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2015-05-08 Thread Forest
Okay, I've written up a short README.Debian describing the necessary changes to /etc/default/lxc-net and the dnsmasq config file. I don't remember what steps are necessary to make the domain names accessible, though, and I'd like to include those steps in the readme. Do I have to restart the

[Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2015-05-07 Thread Forest
Which branch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389954 Title: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2015-02-21 Thread Forest
Sure. Is this the right place? https://github.com/lxc/lxc-pkg-ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389954 Title: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover

[Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2015-01-05 Thread Forest
Thanks for taking an interest in the issue. Since I filed this specifically against lxc in Ubuntu, wouldn't it make sense to start by documenting the necessary config changes (including NetworkManager's dnsmasq config, since it is part of Ubuntu by default) in /usr/share/doc/lxc/README? -- You

[Bug 1389864] [NEW] /etc/dnsmasq.d-available/lxc has no effect on a NetworkManager system

2014-11-05 Thread Forest
Public bug reported: The lxc package installs dnsmasq configuration as /etc/dnsmasq.d-available/lxc, and a symlink to it is created at /etc/dnsmasq.d/lxc, but neither has any effect on the main dnsmasq instance on systems running NetworkManager, because NetworkManager starts a dnsmasq instance

[Bug 1389864] Re: /etc/dnsmasq.d-available/lxc has no effect on a NetworkManager system

2014-11-05 Thread Forest
** Description changed: The lxc package installs dnsmasq configuration as /etc/dnsmasq.d-available/lxc, and a symlink to it is created at /etc/dnsmasq.d/lxc, but neither has any effect on the main dnsmasq instance on systems running NetworkManager, because NetworkManager starts a

[Bug 1389954] [NEW] Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2014-11-05 Thread Forest
Public bug reported: The lxc package on ubuntu does almost nothing to help a user enable DNS resolution for containers via dnsmaq, let alone discover that it is possible. How about enabling it by default? I think all it would take is adding server=/lxc/10.0.3.1 to a file in

[Bug 1153626] Re: Multiple Interfaces and IPs not detected in AWS VPC

2013-11-26 Thread Forest
Sure. The part that stood out to me was refreshes secondary IP addresses during DHCP lease renewal. I haven't examined Amazon's code, but that description reads like it solves the problem of automatically configuring additional IP addresses without requiring additional network interfaces. --

[Bug 1153626] Re: Multiple Interfaces and IPs not detected in AWS VPC

2013-11-25 Thread Forest
I'm in a similar situation: An ec2 instance with just one network interface, to which I have assigned a secondary IP address. This bit from the AWS docs is interesting: If you are using Amazon Linux, the ec2-net-utils package can take care of this step for you. It configures additional network

[Bug 1177684] Re: php5-gd doesn't close /proc/NN/auxv - leaks FDs?

2013-06-11 Thread Forest Bond
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg- turbo/+bug/1189939 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1177684 Title: php5-gd doesn't close /proc/NN/auxv -

[Bug 1088160] Re: ovs-brcompatd: could not open brcompat socket. Check brcompat kernel module.

2013-01-12 Thread Forest Zhang
Hi, i spent lots of time to get this brcompat module loaded but all failed on Ubuntu12.10. Is anybody still working on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.

[Bug 833073] Re: oneiric gdm picker list contains system user, rabbitmq

2012-01-06 Thread Forest
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833073 Title: oneiric gdm picker list

[Bug 795315] Re: unknown protocol speaking not SSL to HTTPS port on apache2 reload/restart

2011-06-21 Thread Forest
This was seen on Ubuntu Maverick just a week or two ago. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795315 Title:

[Bug 795315] [NEW] unknown protocol speaking not SSL to HTTPS port on apache2 reload/restart

2011-06-09 Thread Forest
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 After enabling ssl on my apache2 installation, doing an apache2 reload or restart produces messages like this in the error log: SSL Library Error: 336027900 error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol speaking not SSL to

[Bug 795315] Re: unknown protocol speaking not SSL to HTTPS port on apache2 reload/restart

2011-06-09 Thread Forest
** Patch added: put-listen-80-last.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795315/+attachment/2163048/+files/put-listen-80-last.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 198351] Re: fusesmb - Not working properly - SIGABORT in getattr() - libsmbclient not thread safe

2009-04-26 Thread Forest
smbnetfs has the same problem, and the developer already has a fix in testing. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=857137aid=2492545group_id=171223 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2492545 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2492545 -- fusesmb - Not

[Bug 98658] Re: cifs doesn't support connecting as guest

2009-04-10 Thread Forest
Does fix released mean that something was changed in an upcoming samba release such that sec=none is no longer required for guest connections? Or, will we have to use sec=none forever? -- cifs doesn't support connecting as guest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98658 You received this bug

[Bug 305454] Re: 'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)

2009-04-10 Thread Forest
This bug might be related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/98658 If you're trying to mount a share using guest access, see if the sec=none option works around the failure. -- 'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)

[Bug 293233] Re: crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files

2009-01-08 Thread Forest
I don't see smbnetfs or fusesmb in your ppa. What would you like us to try, and what's different between it and the official version? -- crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293233 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 198351] Re: fusesmb - Not working properly.

2009-01-07 Thread Forest
Bug 293233 contains a SIGABRT backtrace which might be the same crash we're seeing here. ** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fusesmb - Not working properly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198351 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 293233] Re: crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files

2009-01-07 Thread Forest
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5847 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files

[Bug 198351] Re: fusesmb - Not working properly.

2009-01-07 Thread Forest
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5847 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- fusesmb - Not working properly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198351 You

[Bug 293233] Re: crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files

2009-01-07 Thread Forest
Tying together more related bug reports... (Debian 503038 and Samba 5847 contain some enlightening comments from the smbnetfs and samba developers) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503038 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497572