Hi Louis !
Yes, I have the same understanding of the problem ! So if the fix is available,
and you do port it, I guess you can close the ticket :)
Thanks a lot for you work and effort !
Br,
Peter.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is sub
No, no, I really want to get my hands dirty. Than first of all I will
try to reproduce on Debian, and then check with them how it goes... In
fact, should I use the newest mainstream version of Debian ? Or do you
have any kind of mappings between Debian and Ubuntu releases ?
--
You received this b
Is it really so that I should report the bug to debian via email ?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Strange... please confirm.
Br,
Peter.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Any additional info needed ?
I'm happy to help with anything !
Should be an upstart config for haproxy ? Or you plan to shift away from
upstart ? (I remember to read that somewhere...)
Br,
Peter.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subs
Public bug reported:
In case you have more than one process enabled in the haproxy config, the init
script fails to stop all of those processes.
So to clarify you need to have this in your haproxy.cfg:
"""
...
global
maxconn 32000
ulimit-n65536
user