[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
These updates were presented to slangasek and the point of the making juju1 the default is the one point left that we requested feedback on. Feedback from slangasek is that if we're not prepared to make juju1 the default then: "upon upgrade, juju == juju2; if you want juju1, run juju-1.$fwibble

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
- adding a comment to the juju 2.0 FFe that clarifies that the juju client is built and runs on all architectures, including 32bit. Comment added under the heading Mongodb to this effect since that's where the confusion derived from. - document the process for avoiding a late stage FFe and

[Bug 1564670] Re: After upgrade Juju 1.X should still be the default

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
See bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564622 for the fix in Juju to properly output the messaging to the user. ** Description changed: When upgrading to Xenial the new default Juju version is going to be 2.0. Because 2.0 clients are not compatible with 1.X environments,

[Bug 1564670] Re: After upgrade Juju 1.X should still be the default

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564622 for the reasoning of this path. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564670 Title: After upgrade Juju 1.X should

[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
This will be a target for the Juju team to update and verify that the stripping of the binary is safe and passes all testing. This requires building in some gating based on if the binary is golang vs gccgo. ** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in:

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
** Description changed: The juju team is requesting an FFE for juju-core. Juju2 represents API changes and new features and bugfixes for juju. We are NOT requesting a place on any image for xenial. This FFE is intended to cover the acceptance of the updated juju-core package, as well as

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
** Description changed: The juju team is requesting an FFE for juju-core. Juju2 represents API changes and new features and bugfixes for juju. We are NOT requesting a place on any image for xenial. This FFE is intended to cover the acceptance of the updated juju-core package, as well as

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
Add item - document the process for avoiding a late stage FFe and package upload for 16.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
In an IRC conversation with: stgraber, infinity, mgz We agreed that the outstanding issues are the following: - adding a comment to the juju 2.0 FFe that clarifies that the juju client is built and runs on all architectures, including 32bit. - move the juju binary metapackage suggest juju-1.25

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-30 Thread Richard Harding
No, there is no KVM local provider in Juju 2.0. Product management has made the determination that the lxd tool provides the needed functionality for both the lxc and kvm use cases. lxd in Juju 2.0 will be the answer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-23 Thread Richard Harding
As part of our exception, we're blocking the inclusion of two other packages: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1561043 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1561037 As we update Juju around this exception those will be effected and will need to have some leeway in the process. -- You

[Bug 1408280] Re: juju-quickstart fails with SSL verification errors

2015-01-07 Thread Richard Harding
Curtis, did you have a bug filed I can look back at the history there? I faintly recall the conversation but I don't remember if we had some documentation/bug to go with it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1359938] [NEW] [FFE] request to update juju-quickstart to support JUJU env var

2014-08-21 Thread Richard Harding
Public bug reported: We'd like to complete updating juju-quickstart to support a $JUJU env variable to help enable and aid CI and testing. This would allow the user to specify which Juju client to use which would open the doors to testing quickstart on one system against several versions of Juju.

[Bug 1359944] [NEW] [FFE] Update juju-quickstart to support MAAS as a configurable provider

2014-08-21 Thread Richard Harding
Public bug reported: We have the goal this cycle of updating juju-quickstart to be able to build the environments.yaml block for MAAS as it can for local, ec2, hpcloud, etc. This work is not yet complete, but we'd like to request an exception to get it in. There is little risk that adding

[Bug 1325013] Re: juju-quickstart has no dep8 tests so can break when juju-core changes

2014-06-26 Thread Richard Harding
** Changed in: juju-quickstart Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: juju-quickstart Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-quickstart in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1149410] Re: Stuck on Trying to connect to the Juju environment

2014-05-05 Thread Richard Harding
Brian, can you do me a favor and check out the network inspector tool of the browser in your scenario? The client you load the GUI from needs to be able to login/pull down the JS from the GUI charm, however it also needs to talk on other ports as it holds a websocket connection to the juju state

[Bug 1316291] Re: juju-quickstart hangs on machine 1 provisioning is pending

2014-05-05 Thread Richard Harding
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1306537 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306537 Marked as a dupe. This is corrected in juju-quickstart 1.3.2. We'll work on getting it updated in Trusty after the holiday this week. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1306537 LXC local

[Bug 1282630] Re: [FFe] Upgrade juju-quickstart to new upstream release 1.3.0

2014-04-02 Thread Richard Harding
Yes, we were originally told the feature we were waiting on would be in release 1.18. It ended up they cut additional releases ahead of 1.18 that implemented what was required. The 1.18 note is no longer valid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1273865] Re: [MIR] juju-quickstart, python-jujuclient, urwid, websocket-client

2014-03-26 Thread Richard Harding
@Michael - Can you explain what all the PPA adding and pulling in packages from universe is about? Why not depend on juju-core directly, or is this installation done on other machines? Quickstart is meant to provide a nice single point to get developers and users started with Juju as fast and

[Bug 1149410] Re: Stuck on Trying to connect to the Juju environment

2013-09-17 Thread Richard Harding
Marking invalid as fixes have been released and things have been quite for a while. If the issue returns please open a new bug. ** Changed in: juju-gui Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 418897] Re: Segfaults in apache2 with libapache2-mod-php5 installed

2009-09-15 Thread Richard Harding
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Segfaults in apache2 with libapache2-mod-php5 installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418897 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. --

[Bug 418897] Re: Segfaults in apache2 with libapache2-mod-php5 installed

2009-09-13 Thread Richard Harding
Just to verify the workaround above of disabling the session encryption seems to be working so far. -- Segfaults in apache2 with libapache2-mod-php5 installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418897 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is