[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread Thag
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in

[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.

2010-11-12 Thread Thag
I'll vote for gerry's patch. -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.

2010-11-03 Thread Thag
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, gerry skerbitz 632...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: The problem is fixed if we add `-p $CATALINA_PID` to the start-stop-daemon line in catalina_sh(). Isn't that something we should be able to rely on? {{{ *** tomcat6~2010-10-11 13:21:52.0 -0500 ---

Re: [Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.

2010-09-09 Thread Thag
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote: I agree that we should not force tomcat6 to run under a user that has no bash running. Note that the proposed patch breaks use of AUTHBIND. This should rather be fixed by shipping once and for all the catalina.sh

[Bug 632554] [NEW] tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.

2010-09-07 Thread Thag
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 While it's not recommended to run tomcat as root, there are circumstances that make it a necessity, like embedded systems. (IMHO Linux should not enforce policy at this level) Anyway, setting the following in /etc/default/tomcat6

[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.

2010-09-07 Thread Thag
** Patch added: This is a fix that does not alter the behavior in any way, but fixes ths problem. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554/+attachment/1554204/+files/tomcat6-init.patch -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You

[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.

2010-09-07 Thread Thag
Left debug info in patch...sorry. New patch attached. ** Patch added: Patch - without debug info and correct offsets this time. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+attachment/1555462/+files/tomcat6-init.patch -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already

Re: [Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic

2010-07-01 Thread Thag
Pin it back to Jaunty...groan. Package: slapd Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 Pin-Priority: 1100 Package: ldap-utils Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 Pin-Priority: 1100 Package: libldap-2.4-2 Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 Pin-Priority: 1100 -Bruce On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM,

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-23 Thread Thag
Can someone change this from wishlist to something more likely to get fixed? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-20 Thread Thag
What is the functional state of openldap-dit? (https://launchpad.net /openldap-dit/) It hasn't seen any activity since 2009-12-02 and there are no milestones and no available downloads. The trunk show last modified 20 weeks ago. Is it functional, or the early stages of work in progress? The

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-14 Thread Thag
Apologies in advance for the useless rant, but whose idea was it to strip out the default ldap config? I second the comments of everyone here that laments the time when slapd just worked. The cn=config change was difficult to swallow, but in the interest of progress, OK, fine. This release

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-14 Thread Thag
Just to get a feel for the state here, is there currently any work done at all for this slapd-dit package? Why is this marked as Won't fix? Is Ubuntu planning a new LTS release with no LDAP? That'll go over well. Has anyone in canonocal mgmt even seen this? Or is it a nasty little surprise

[Bug 511245] Re: portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

2010-04-12 Thread Thag
I'd like to bump the priority on this as it makes it impossible for servers to come up clean. For an LTS release, I would expect that having servers boot clean would be a priority. -- portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

[Bug 511245] Re: portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

2010-04-12 Thread Thag
Gets worse if you add SAN volumes that are NFS exported. There's a corner case here that's not working at all: 1 - QLogic SAN - Fails to come up until I reload qla driver with modprobe -r/modprobe 2 - NFS export, since #1 didn't come up, export also fails. 3 - Since #2 didn't come up, autofs

[Bug 375493] Re: tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda

2009-06-12 Thread Thag
While I agree that it is possible to get the same behavior with the addition of: JAVA_OPTS=-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8000,server=y,suspend=n -Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128M to default/tomcat6, it is finding this information that is non-trivial. A simple -d switch, or

[Bug 375493] Re: tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda

2009-05-12 Thread Thag
** Attachment added: Adds jpda debug option to tomcat6 init.d http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26639186/tomcatinit.patch -- tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 375493] [NEW] tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda

2009-05-12 Thread Thag
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 I had filed this in the wrong place, but I don't see any links to it now. Apologies if it's a dup. Bits and pieces pasted here from different sources but it all describes the prob. tomcat 6 in jaunty: dpkg -l | grep tomcat6 ii libtomcat6-java

[Bug 374567] [NEW] tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils

2009-05-10 Thread Thag
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 Here's a stack trace when I try to load my app with the ubuntu packaged jaunty tomcat6: May 10, 2009 11:11:28 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of

[Bug 374567] Re: tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils

2009-05-10 Thread Thag
Forgot platform details: This is an up to data jaunty 64 bit system. It's running without an X server, if that matters. I know some java apps barf because of this. # update-java-alternatives -l java-6-openjdk 1061 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk java-gcj 1042 /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj It's set to

[Bug 374567] Re: tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils

2009-05-10 Thread Thag
** Attachment added: This is the web service that exhibits the problem on tomcat6 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26540236/service-war.war -- tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374567 You received this bug notification

[Bug 374567] Re: tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils

2009-05-10 Thread Thag
Found a workaround, disabling TOMCAT_SECURITY in /etc/init.d/tomcat6 allows this app to run. -Bruce -- tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server