[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2010-01-06 Thread emarkay
Can we get this marked as NOT Invalid and Low priority?? -- Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2010-01-02 Thread emarkay
Correct. Apology offered. My bad. Still, can't understand why this is lower priority than cloud, 3d graphics, login sound, and other fluff issues, whereas this is a fundamental flaw a core part of the operating system; and it's not just an isolated, individual issue. Maybe it is operator error,

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-12-30 Thread emarkay
Editorial: Just amazed - I even got blasted on the forums on this - as if it's my issue only... There were others there, as here, with the exact problem. Maybe Mark S. was correct in abandoning ship (the owner of the company that created Ubuntu.) I think the days of intelligent developers and

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-26 Thread emarkay
Well? If not for Karmic, then for Lucid! -- Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. --

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-24 Thread emarkay
I have 2 virgin Karmic machines now, waiting to test. Let's pretend I am a new Ubuntuite and want to have 2 PC's communicate in Ubuntu and Windows XP. If there is a bug we'll uncover it and if there is a config issue we'll clarify it, and in the end, there will be a legit and validated

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-23 Thread emarkay
First, sorry about sharename - I didn't even know about that - I guess ShareName is the default? Second - I notice that the folders I have made as shared are no longer, on both machines - I reenabled them - I did not know when and how this had happened. #12: 1. Type in Location in Nautilus:

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-22 Thread emarkay
#8: Regarding Winbind, all 3 machines ALSO have Win XPSP3 (NTFS) and I do want and expect to be able to connect to those when booted as such. But you now see all the bogus and misleading info that is out there and we NEED to have Lucid address this! Thierry, I will get the additional information

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-22 Thread emarkay
#8: 1. Winbind uninstalled vua Synaptic. 2. $ smb://192.168.x.xxx/sharename bash: smb://192.168.x1.xxx/sharename: No such file or directory 3. /var/log/samba/log.nmbd Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 1:39 PM [2009/10/18 13:34:03, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:71(terminate) Got SIGTERM: going down...

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-22 Thread emarkay
Again, what is Incomplete on this Bug submission? -- Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. --

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-21 Thread emarkay
Chuck, that's Step One. Is that correctly formatted? Shouldn't that be a native part of Samba Configuration since I understand UFW is installed and activated by default? This example is one of the reasons I, and many others, are having troubles with Ubuntu Networking (as evidenced on the

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-21 Thread emarkay
Also, what is Incomplete about this report or issue, as indicated by yis change in Status? -- Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-21 Thread emarkay
#4: Winbind, because somewhere it was recommended to have installed. #5: 1. smb://192.168.x.xxx/sharename in Nautilus (Ctrl-L) gives: the shared directory on this machine only, after entering my share password. 2. smb://name of thus PC/sharenamegives: the shared directory on this machine

[Bug 456808] [NEW] Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2009-10-20 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I have been tryiong to get my 3 PC's networked, for the past few Ubuntu releases, with no success. As I have more experience with Ubuntu than most novice users, this may indicate something that needs substantial attention for Lucid. I don't expect