[Bug 540625] [NEW] Why was QEMU proper dropped in favor of KVM?

2010-03-17 Thread whardier
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm If I can't access qemu proper anymore whats the use of having kqemu-* still available? Many users don't have VT enabled processors - having qemu proper and kqemu was a very good method of emulating hosts using the very popular qemu system.

Re: [Bug 540625] Re: Why was QEMU proper dropped in favor of KVM?

2010-03-17 Thread whardier
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498107 This bug is nothing like the duplicate you've assigned to it. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dustin Kirkland dustin.kirkl...@gmail.com wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***    

Re: [Bug 162253] Re: openssh: want hpn-ssh for 20x speed improvement!

2009-02-12 Thread whardier
I submished a patch for this on the debian side of things.. but i'd love to see an official version based on the openssh tarballs and it's own package full fledged packages. Josh Ellis wrote: Ditto. It's got my vote - this is the number one thing on my wishlist! -- openssh: want hpn-ssh for

Re: [Bug 249273] Re: python-samba - where did it go?

2008-07-17 Thread whardier
Sigh.. I was assuming the changelog link on the packages website pointed to the most recent changelog. Instead I was looking at an older changelog that didn't contain that message. It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats going on @ debian. Mathias Gug wrote:

Re: [Bug 249273] Re: python-samba - where did it go?

2008-07-17 Thread whardier
I compiled it, it segfaulted a lot.. probably a reason it's abandoned... Now I just need somebody to swig up python-smbclient :) Shane Mathias Gug wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:17:15PM -, whardier wrote: It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats going