PadLock for x86_64 is supported by OpenSSL 1.0.1 and the trunk (1.1.0) branches
- but not on the 1.0.0 and previous branches.
Isa there a chance Ubuntu will release OpenSSL 1.0.1+ packages in a PPA or
provide instructions on how to properly build OpenSSL yourself for Ubuntu?
--
You received
Just tested the default OpenSSL package (0.9.8k-7ubuntu8) on Ubuntu
Server 10.04 LTS 64 bit installed on a DELL XS11-VX8 alias Fortuna
(uses a Via Nano U2250 http://www.online.net/serveur-dedie/offre-
dedibox-v3.xhtml ) and VIA Padlock is still not supported :(
The only way of getting it to work
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #368476
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368476
** Also affects: openssl (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368476
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
** Changed in: openssl (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
** Description changed:
VIA PadLock is a hardware cryptography engine for AES and SHA1/256.
OpenSSL now supports PadLock, but a cache logic bug prevents the use of
the PadLock engine.
A fairly trivial patch exists and has been merged in OpenSSL 0.9.8g
upstream. See bug #119295 for
I've tried instruction from
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7167334postcount=45 in ubuntu 9.10 and
padlock engine in openssl works now on 64-bit system.
It'll be great if this patch will be add to mainstream.
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294
yes, it's via nano.
some of new notebooks with it already sell here and I've bought one.
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock?
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:37 AM, JanCeuleers jan.ceule...@computer.org wrote:
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock?
Via Nano: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_nano
--tim
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294
You received this bug
I found that support of VIA padlock missed in amd64 version of openssl.
In i386 version of ubuntu it works perfect:
$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686
GNU/Linux
$ aptitude show openssl
Package: openssl
State: installed
Automatically
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. Has this been implemented yet. Can you try
with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
** Bug watch added: 'Bug tracker at http://rt.openssl.org/' #1559
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1559
** Also affects: ssl-cert via
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1559
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
Upstream bug:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1668user=guestpass=guest
Though the bug hasn't been closed, the patch has been applied to 0.9.8h
as is trivially verifiable by examination of the source.
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
