[Bug 1264231] Re: Include samba and libpam-smbpass packages by default

2014-01-05 Thread Ritesh Khadgaray
** Also affects: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1264231 Title: Include samba and libpam-smbpass

[Bug 1264231] Re: Include samba and libpam-smbpass packages by default

2014-01-05 Thread Ritesh Khadgaray
I believe nautlius-share should be updated to include samba under requirement, rather than suggestion. Do we want to include samba by default wrt security ? --- nautilus-share-0.7.3/debian/control 2014-01-05 18:10:42.332795956 +0530 +++ nautilus-share-0.7.3/debian/control 2014-01-05

[Bug 1264231] Re: Include samba and libpam-smbpass packages by default

2014-01-05 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
As per: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2014-January/037944.html https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2014-January/037945.html ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You

[Bug 1264231] Re: Include samba and libpam-smbpass packages by default

2013-12-26 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I think changes like this should receive consensus from a wider audience, rather than just from people watching bugs in samba. In particular, I don't know what any downsides of doing this might be, and it would be

[Bug 1264231] Re: Include samba and libpam-smbpass packages by default

2013-12-26 Thread Pablo Almeida
Hi, Robie. Thanks for the directions. I posted this idea there and will follow the discussion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1264231 Title: Include samba and