Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389305
Title:
sudo doesn't work on unprivileged lxc container on top
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected trusty
** Description changed:
On Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit, after adding a user into an unprivileged
container, the sudo complains that:
$ sudo su
sudo: effective uid is not 0, is /usr/bin/sudo on a file system with the
'nosuid' option se
(marking low priority for lxc because ther eis a workaround)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389305
Title
Quoting Adam Ryczkowski (adam.ryczkow...@statystyka.net):
> For one thing, the lxc-create can check if it is going to create a
> user-space container on top of the ecryptfs, and warn the user if
True. Though I would prefer not to work around the bug like this
until we are certain that it cannot
For one thing, the lxc-create can check if it is going to create a
user-space container on top of the ecryptfs, and warn the user if
appriopriate with the link to this bug report. That should be fairly
easy to implement, because on the default setup the ecryptfs would be
the underlying fs, so t
For one thing the lxc-create could warn the user (with the link to this
bug report) if it finds, that the user is attempting to create a
user-space container on top of the ecryptfs. I believe that should be
fairly easy to implement. And I guess it is rather important to do,
because user never g
Great, thanks for the information.
ecryptfs is a stackable filesystem, meaning that it sits between a real
filesystem and your view of it, interpreting (encrypting/decrypting)
data. There are several things which are notably difficult for a
stackign filesystem to get right.
I'm going to mark thi
On 19.11.2014 15:35, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Ah, the ecryptfs $HOME might be the problem. I haven't tested that
> and wouldn't be surprised if ecryptfs prevented the console from
> looking ok. Could you try something like:
>
> rm -rf $HOME/.config/lxc $HOME/.local/share/lxc
> sudo mkdir /opt/lxc
>
Ah, the ecryptfs $HOME might be the problem. I haven't tested that
and wouldn't be surprised if ecryptfs prevented the console from
looking ok. Could you try something like:
rm -rf $HOME/.config/lxc $HOME/.local/share/lxc
sudo mkdir /opt/lxc
sudo chown -R $USER /opt/lxc
mkdir /opt/lxc/config /op
Quoting Adam Ryczkowski (adam.ryczkow...@statystyka.net):
> I really don't know how to tell you, which Trusty's 64bit minimal cd I
The full url.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I really don't know how to tell you, which Trusty's 64bit minimal cd I
used. I didn't even know that there are more than one.
I just downloaded the fresh minimal cd about week before posting this
bug. When opening the minimal cd in file browser I see no files with
names "version", "changelog" or a
Sorry, the previous one was from guest. Here is a host
adam@ubuntu-server:~$ cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
udev /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=1011476k,nr_inodes=252869,mode=755 0 0
d
adam@p1:~$ cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
/home/adam/.Private / ecryptfs
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,ecryptfs_fnek_sig=799bd5c1f75cea45,ecryptfs_sig=cead7dbeb43d6c20,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_unlink_sigs
0 0
proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
sysfs
Can you paste /proc/mounts from your host please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389305
Title:
sudo doesn't work on unprivileged lxc container
To manage notifications
15 matches
Mail list logo