[Bug 1459638] Re: maximum_object_size has no effect in default configuration file

2015-10-06 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: bitesize -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1459638 Title: maximum_object_size has no effect in default configuration file To manage notifications about

[Bug 1459638] Re: maximum_object_size has no effect in default configuration file

2015-10-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
For the record, upstream patch for this was http://www.squid- cache.org/Versions/v3/3.4/changesets/squid-3.4-13130.patch. The code part of this should apply fine to any affected version of Squid. ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1459638] Re: maximum_object_size has no effect in default configuration file

2015-06-01 Thread Robie Basak
Thanks. Upstream says this was fixed in 3.4.5, which we don't have in Ubuntu yet. So this bug remains valid in Ubuntu. ** Tags removed: needs-upstream-report ** Changed in: squid3 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1459638] Re: maximum_object_size has no effect in default configuration file

2015-05-30 Thread gcc
Filed upstream. ** Bug watch added: Squid Bugzilla #4255 http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 ** Also affects: squid via http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1459638] Re: maximum_object_size has no effect in default configuration file

2015-05-29 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. If this also affects upstream, it should be reported there if it is not already. We can cherry-pick a fix in Ubuntu but I'd prefer to do that only after an upstream commit lands so we don't end up maintaining