[Bug 273425] Re: It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files

2008-09-25 Thread Omid Mottaghi
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in

[Bug 273425] Re: It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files

2008-09-25 Thread Mathias Gug
/var/www has been the default for ages. I don't see why it should be moved to /var/www/default. Most of the web applications expect it to be so. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files

[Bug 273425] Re: It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files

2008-09-25 Thread Omid Mottaghi
But in RedHat, there is another directory in /var/www for default website. -- It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 273425] Re: It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files

2008-09-25 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Omid Mottaghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in RedHat, there is another directory in /var/www for default website. That's all ***very*** configurable via normal Apache configuration means. The default location in Ubuntu is /var/www. You can run hundreds of

[Bug 273425] Re: It's better to have a sub-directory in /var/www for default web files

2008-09-23 Thread Alan Pope
/var/www is just the default. If you wish to have multiple websites for different users then you need to take a look at virtual hosts. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ApacheMySQLPHP#Virtual Hosts ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = apache2 Status: New = Invalid