The SIGCHASE code is limited to the dig and host commands, and (as far
as I can tell), any regression would be limited to failures when using
the sigchase options (which currently just say invalid option
+sigchase, so they wouldn't particularly be regressions as much as
continued bugs.) The code
also, yes, there are soname changes. The only consumers of the affected
libraries are packages from the bind9 source, so this is also a non-
issue.
lamont
--
SRU for bind9 to 9.4.2.dfsg.P2 on hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279316
You received this bug notification because you are a
Unfortunately the changelog of the SRU only mentions bug 257682, so I'll
close this one (since it is fixed in intrepid) and we are using that bug
for verification testing.
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
SRU for bind9 to 9.4.2.dfsg.P2 on hardy
$ diffstat ./bind9_9.4.2.dfsg.P2-2.debdiff
CHANGES| 46
COPYRIGHT |4
bin/dig/dighost.c | 14
bin/named/client.c |4
bin/named/config.c |7
bin/named/controlconf.c| 10
