[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-04-15 Thread Jan Kovacik
I have Interpid box with RTL8169 chipped gigabit NIC from REPOTEC. When I am copying from samba share to XP machine transfer speed is about 38MB/s, but when I try to copy file TO samba share, the transfer speed is fluctuating between 500 KB and 8 MB/s. However, I am able to copy four files

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-04-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Bob: your issue seems different: this bug is about bad performance in cifs compared to smbfs (and seems related to RTL81xx chips). Your bug is about a performance regression in CIFS from intrepid to Jaunty. Could you please file a separate bug so that it can be properly investigated ? Thanks in

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-03-29 Thread Bob Busters
ubuntu 9.04 beta nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) im getting slow speeds over samba like 68kB/s. it works ok in intrepid. -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug notification

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-03-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
Really seems to be a realtek driver problem: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4889 Anyone with a RTL81xx chipset reproducing it in intrepid or jaunty ? -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-01-04 Thread Jean Roberto Souza
I was making one transfer now, from my Ubuntu 8.04 to my XP and noticed the slow transfer. Here I am reading this bug and reporting that it still exist. I'm looking for a solution but until now I only found bug reports. -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-11-12 Thread Ben Hodgetts (Enverex)
Thought it may be worth adding, I'm using Gentoo with a Realtek Gigabit onboard adapter and getting ~3MB/s throughput too (when transfering to a Samba share). -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-08-29 Thread Huygens
I also had the experience yesterday. I was transfering a 6.5GB file (VM image) from my MacBook (using Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger) to my PC (using Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron). I was using the wireless connection (54Mb/s rt61pci), so a theorical 6.4MB/s. Such a transfer should in theory take about 17 min.