[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2012-02-20 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
** Changed in: euca2ools Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 Title: Rebundled uec instance boot fail To manage

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-11-18 Thread Scott Moser
fixed upstream in r316 http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~eucalyptus- maintainers/euca2ools/euca2ools-main/revision/316 ** Also affects: euca2ools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: euca2ools Status: New = Fix Committed -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-15 Thread Scott Moser
Quoting nurmi: | As discussed this morning, we don't foresee any problem that would | come up if this patch were put in place. Neil has looked at the | patch, and agrees that it will solve this specific problem. In the | future, several options will likely be explored, ranging from |

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-15 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: Scott Moser (smoser) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package euca2ools - 1.2-0ubuntu10 --- euca2ools (1.2-0ubuntu10) lucid; urgency=low * euca-bundle-vol: exclude persistent udev net device rules LP: #551847 -- Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:42:22 -0400 ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-14 Thread Scott Moser
Just for reference, http://forum.eucalyptus.com/forum/multiple-network- interface-configuration discusses multiple network interfaces in a eucalyptus instance. So, simple blacklisting there would possibly, though unlikely could lead to inconsistent naming (kernel change isn't going to occur in

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-14 Thread Scott Moser
The current cloud-init expects that 'eth0' will come up and have the metadata service on it. -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in ubuntu.

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-14 Thread Scott Moser
I just realized that this same issue was fixed in ec2-bundle-vol in bug 308548 . As such, it would be in keeping with that to make the same fix to euca- bundle-vol. -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Also affects: euca2ools (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in ubuntu. --

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-08 Thread Neil Soman
Is this still an issue? Any updates? How do we reproduce this on the upstream side? thanks. -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in ubuntu.

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-08 Thread Scott Moser
I can confirm this on beta2 image (20100407.1). ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-08 Thread Scott Moser
Ok, I found the source of this problem. Its really a dupe of bug 341006 , or at very least, a fix to that bug that addressed the MAC addresses used by UEC would make this problem go away. The reason there is no output after the kernel in the console above is that upstart is quietly waiting for

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-08 Thread Scott Moser
I'm changing the importance of this to 'low' given the easy work around of 'rm etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Low -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-08 Thread Mathias Gug
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:08:43PM -, Scott Moser wrote: a.) cloud-init (or some other package) could possibly add some rules or black lists so the persistent-net rules were not written in images where it was installed. (I'd have to see if this would be possible) Kvm uses the same

Re: [Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-04-08 Thread Scott Moser
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Mathias Gug wrote: Kvm uses the same vendor id for mac addresses. Does EC2 use something similar? If so we could just blacklist mac addresses to not be written to /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. Read the mentioned bug for more information. -- Rebundled uec

[Bug 551847] Re: Rebundled uec instance boot fail

2010-03-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Summary changed: - uec instance boot fail + Rebundled uec instance boot fail ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- Rebundled uec instance boot fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu