Re: [Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-07 Thread Neil Wilson
I disagree. It wouldn't be found in a Xen installation would it. And if you want to use just remote URIs then ' installing this one without them is perfectly reasonable'. Would it not be more appropriate to split libvirt-bin into two packages - one of which is core and can be used for remote URI,

Re: [Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-07 Thread Mathias Gug
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:00:35AM -, Neil Wilson wrote: I disagree. It wouldn't be found in a Xen installation would it. And if you want to use just remote URIs then ' installing this one without them is perfectly reasonable'. I tend to follow the 80/20 rule. My guess is that 80% of the

Re: [Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-07 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Hmm, well, I agree with Mathias' logic. And I do think we're following the Debian policy here for recommends (most libvirt installs accompany a hypervisor). But it does not have to be that way. Personally, I'd be fine downgrading the hypervisors to suggests, if there are no objections... I

[Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-07 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Also affects: libvirt (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: In Progress --

Re: [Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-07 Thread Soren Hansen
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:16:43PM -, Mathias Gug wrote: I disagree. It wouldn't be found in a Xen installation would it. And if you want to use just remote URIs then ' installing this one without them is perfectly reasonable'. I tend to follow the 80/20 rule. My guess is that 80% of the

[Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-07 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Okay, discussed this further with Jamie in IRC... 1) For Lucid, we're going to leave this as is (libvirt recommending kvm), as this is what our users and documentation have grown to expect up until this point at the release of our LTS 2) For Maverick, we can/should drop this to a libvirt

[Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-06 Thread Neil Wilson
See also bug 556326 -- libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 556312] Re: libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages

2010-04-06 Thread Mathias Gug
According to the Debian policy: Recommends This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency. The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations. Suggests This is used to declare that one package may be more