[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2011-02-03 Thread Peshko R.
So, I set up sudoers and works great. But we have another problem thou. I have put everything in the fstab. In Gnome if you go to Places you see the mount point, but if you decide to go there it says Unable to mount test2 (which is my mount point for the cifs). If I manually mount it, obviously

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-06-25 Thread jgreenso
Does this mean other mount.X utils will be similarly affected? Does the fstab man page now need to be updated to say that the 'user' flag does not apply to cifs and possibly others? -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805 You received this

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-06-21 Thread bbruecker
setuid bit is set to /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs: sudo ls -la /bin/mount /sbin/mount.cifs -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 72188 2010-03-22 18:51 /bin/mount -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 30424 2010-04-09 17:29 /sbin/mount.cifs but I got: mount -t cifs //server/datenauf$ /mnt -o user,rw,user=bbr,dom=ivu-ag

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-28 Thread Derek Simkowiak
I disagree with Dietmar's comment #5, which says that 9.10 didn't have the setuid bit. Here is my Ubuntu 9.10: r...@cst6:~# ls -la /bin/mount /sbin/mount.cifs -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 78096 2009-10-22 21:28 /bin/mount -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 36296 2010-03-22 15:27 /sbin/mount.cifs Here is my

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-27 Thread Ganton
Thierry, what about /bin/mount? $ which mount | xargs ls -l -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 72188 2010-03-22 18:51 /bin/mount it has the setuid bit set. Should mount and mount.cifs be treated equally? Previously, people could use mount without wondering if it was sudo mount.cifs or just mount or

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Setting the setuid bit on mount.cifs is discouraged upstream and opens interesting security vulnerabilities: smbfs (2:3.4.5~dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low * As of this version, the mount.cifs binary is no longer setuid. Upstream has always been increasingly unsupportive of this

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-19 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
I think Dietmar's comment #5 is pretty interesting: the binaries in 9.10 did *NOT* have the suid-bit set, but it definitely worked for me back then (and for others too, as they reported). So there must have been a way to make this work. Have there been any of the mechanisms mentioned by Wladimir

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-11 Thread Wladimir Mutel
DebianSamba people say that's insecure to add setuid bit on these binaries, and so this fix is discouraged. Probably this could be resolved through some other security mechanism, like PolicyKit or pmount ? -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-09 Thread Sina Eetezadi
For me on the Lenovo T410s with the desktop edition setuid fixed it. However on the Asus EeePC 901 with the Netbook Edition is was not necessary to set. Just to mention. -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805 You received this bug

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-07 Thread DietmarLudmann
Same here, setuid fixed it, thx. Since I still have Ubuntu 9.10 on another partition I looked up the permissions and found out that mount.cifs und umount.cifs have no setuid bit set there and they are working without it (on Ubuntu 9.10). -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-04 Thread Timmmm
Yeah got this issue too. Was mount.cifs suid in 9.10? There's also a 'Mount FUSE filesystems' permission that can be set for users through the GUI now. It made no difference though... -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805 You received this

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-02 Thread Andries Filmer
the fix sudo chmod +s `which mount.cifs` sudo chmod +s `which umount.cifs` -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-04-29 Thread booi
I too have run into this issue. 9.10 this was fine, 10.04 mount.cifs requires the setuid bit before allowing users to do this w/o sudo privileges. This may be a packaging regression? -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805 You received this

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-04-17 Thread Adrien Chauve
** Description changed: Binary package hint: samba In 9.10 this worked fine: dut...@vampire:~$ mount.cifs //dragon/dutchy ~/dragon/ Password: In 10.04, i get: dut...@vampire:~$ mount.cifs //dragon/dutchy dragon/ - Password: + Password: mount error(1): Operation not

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-04-15 Thread Dutchy
** Attachment added: CifsVersion.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44263109/CifsVersion.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44263110/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-04-15 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server