[Bug 394398] Re: Logic to determine expected number of running session wrong (regression in hardy's open-iscsi 2.0.865-1ubuntu3.1)
** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Canonical Server Team (canonical-server) -- Logic to determine expected number of running session wrong (regression in hardy's open-iscsi 2.0.865-1ubuntu3.1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
(In the future, please just upload simple patches like that; it's easy to reject them in the few cases where there aren't appropriate, and in general having it in the queue already speeds things up) -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Thierry Carrez (ttx) -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
Uploaded. ** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246324] Re: initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't
lvm2 package should drop a hook for it's configuration in initramfs. ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246324] Re: initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't
Please add
mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}/etc/lvm
cp -p /etc/lvm/lvm.conf ${DESTDIR}/etc/lvm/lvm.conf
to the lvm hook. This does no harm and helps a lot with drbd.
I have almost given up with drbd and ubuntu cause of this issue until i
was pointed to this bug entry.
Problem exists in jaunty (9.04) as well.
--
initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it
shouldn't
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246324] Re: initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't
I've uploaded a fix for lvm2. I don't think initramfs-tools itself requires any changes, so I'm marking that task Invalid. ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246324] Re: initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't
This bug was fixed in the package lvm2 - 2.02.39-0ubuntu11 --- lvm2 (2.02.39-0ubuntu11) karmic; urgency=low * Copy /etc/lvm/lvm.conf into the initramfs (LP: #246324). -- Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:52:21 +0100 ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 399468] Re: samba 3.4.0 depends on ufw
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 2:3.4.0-1ubuntu2 --- samba (2:3.4.0-1ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low * debian/control: Suggest ufw, (LP: #399468) -- Chuck Short zul...@ubuntu.com Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:01:41 -0400 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- samba 3.4.0 depends on ufw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 322840] Re: upgrade to slapd failed
I ran slapd with -d any and figured out that the problem is in the following lines in /etc/ldap/slapd.conf (it seems they were added by package update script) overlay syncprov syncprov-checkpoint 100 10 syncprov-sessionlog 100 Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the exact error message - this slapd instance is critical for our network. After commenting out these lines, slapd started normally. -- upgrade to slapd failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322840 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 194140] Re: Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
Thank you for assigning this bug to someone. Is there any other info I should provide? -- Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 194140] Re: Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
I cannot reproduce this; I can successfully install and upgrade libsasl2-2 on intrepid, jaunty, and karmic. ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 194140] Re: Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
Kees, what do you use to perform the installation? Here, both APT and aptitude fail as shown above, during an upgrade. This behavior is verified on both Debian and Ubuntu, using APT and aptitude. -- Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 399850] [NEW] dovecot.conf references /dev/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf instead of /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dovecot-common /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and /usr/share/dovecot/dovecot.conf refer users to /dev/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf instead of /etc/dovecot /dovecot-postfix.conf. ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dovecot.conf references /dev/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf instead of /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399850 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 194140] Re: Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
Here is my intrepid machine upgrading libsasl2-2: # lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu 8.10 # apt-cache policy libsasl2-2 libsasl2-2: Installed: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1 Version table: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1 0 500 file: intrepid-security/main Packages *** 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2 0 500 file: intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status # apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded: libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules 2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/283kB of archives. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 11164 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libsasl2-2 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2 (using .../libsasl2-2_2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libsasl2-2 ... Preparing to replace libsasl2-modules 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2 (using .../libsasl2-modules_2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libsasl2-modules ... Setting up libsasl2-modules (2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1) ... Setting up libsasl2-2 (2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1) ... Processing triggers for libc6 ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place # -- Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 396327] Re: package libapache2-mod-php5filter 5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10
I did run fsck with the drive mounted. Now installations and uninstallations do not go smoothly. Pls how can I rectify that? Arinze On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.comwrote: Looking at the logs in this bug reports, it looks like you have some dpkg database corruption. Regards chuck ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package libapache2-mod-php5filter 5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396327 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “php5” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Binary package hint: php5 Ubuntu 9.04 E: libapache2-mod-php5filter: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 E: php5: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: libapache2-mod-php5filter 5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu1 SourcePackage: php5 Tags: ubuntu-unr Title: package libapache2-mod-php5filter 5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 -- Arinze O. Izukanne TradeSmart Global Services Office Tel: +234-9-4819738 Mobile: +234-(0)- 807-764-1151 Email: aizuka...@tradesmartglobal.com www.tradesmartglobal.com Lenny Bruce http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/l/lenny_bruce.html - Communism is like one big phone company. -- package libapache2-mod-php5filter 5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Steve Beattie offered the following feedback on IRC: sbeattie re samba; I ran the security team's qa-regression-tests against it, but that doesn't say much about winbind. This still leaves some risk of regression, but is better than what we had; given the alignment with the 8.04.3 point release I'm going to go ahead with publishing, but this highlights the need for test cases to be established *before* SRUs are accepted into -proposed... -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328874] Re: getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8 --- samba (3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8) hardy-proposed; urgency=low * Added debian/patches/fix-winbindd-crash-dc.patch: - Fix winbindd crash when calling getent group on domain controller (LP: #328874) - upstream commit in 3.0 branch: db4a435d235bedf48d668a0f4418dd46f38044ed - upstream bug: #5906 -- Adrien Cunin adri2...@ubuntu.com Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:16:22 +0100 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 399468] Re: samba 3.4.0 depends on ufw
I don't know surely, but samba depended on samba-common-bin before this release and now only recommends -- samba 3.4.0 depends on ufw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 394350] Re: RLimitCPU has no effect in Apache
Here is the virtual host config from the procedure documented in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/394350/comments/15 It is file: /etc/apache2/sites-available/default ** Attachment added: default http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29096236/default -- RLimitCPU has no effect in Apache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 236640] Re: iSCSI install fails under hardy
When I was testing I had forgotten that there had to be a local disk present for open-iscsi to get loaded. I retested this morning with a dummy hard disk in play and the install completed successfully. Thank you all for your hard work on this one! -- iSCSI install fails under hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236640 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 237460] Re: Root on iscsi is not supported
What needs to be done to make the open-iscsi-udeb load earlier in the install sequence so its block devices are available to disk-detect? Sounds like the initramfs problem is solved. As for blowing away the networking, one possible solution: if the installer knows what interface the initiator came up on, it can set that to manual in /etc/network/interfaces as part of its cleanup. -- Root on iscsi is not supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
