Is there any consensus on what needs to be done here? I'll gladly apply
a patch upstream if there is agreement on what must be done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu.
** Package changed: dovecot (Ubuntu) = openssl (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016905
Title:
Public bug reported:
juju on current development version of Ubuntu (quantal) fails to build
from source due to several test cases failing/giving errors.
I've attached the build log.
** Affects: juju (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: ftbfs quantal
--
You
** Attachment added: juju build log quantal pbuilder-dist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017113/+attachment/3202385/+files/last_operation.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
I tested the patch you, Allesandro Losavio, suggested on IRC, and in
that version it's not good, since it makes juju fail to build from
source.
It's worth noting that currently juju also FTBFS in Quantal due to
failing test cases, see Bug #1017113, however, applying this patch makes
it fail
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: juju (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017113
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016886 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016886
Public bug reported:
Don't work
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: winbind 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016886 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016886
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017141
Title:
package winbind
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016886 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016886
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1016886, so is being marked as such.
Hi Martin. These are basically timeouts because each test needs to
finish in less than 5 seconds. Some of them take 1 - 2 seconds normally,
so if your system gets busy for a second, that can be enough to push a
few of them over 5 seconds.
A few tips:
1) I use sbuild, not pbuilder. If you use the
fwiw, i'm experimenting atm with a small test runner change/diff to disable
zk fsync
http://paste.ubuntu.com/1057627/
-k
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Hi Martin. These are basically timeouts because each test needs to
finish in less than 5 seconds. Some
alo, I'd suggest submitting this as a merge proposal against juju
itself... To do that:
bzr branch lp:juju
cd juju
edit
./test
bzr commit -m 'Useful commit message' --fixes lp:956000
bzr push lp:~alo21/juju/fix-lp95600
bzr lp-propose
It makes no sense for this to land in Ubuntu first with Juju
** Branch linked: lp:~alo21/juju/fix-lp956000
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956000
Title:
'juju bootstrap' with no arguments gives confusing message
To manage
I pushed my branch as required. You can find it here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alo21/juju/fix-lp956000/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956000
Title:
'juju
** Summary changed:
- Please update nmap: stable upstream version is 5.52
+ Please update nmap to version 6
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #674573
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674573
** Changed in: nmap (Debian)
Status: Fix Released = Unknown
** Changed
Have Red Hat patched their stable release with this fix? I'm wondering
if the patch is a patch that demonstrates the workaround for a bug or is
intended for production code. Has upstream committed a fix?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Changed in: nmap (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739297
Title:
Please update nmap to version 6
To manage notifications about
It does not look like Redhat has done anything with this officially.
Paul is the release manager of Openswan:
http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Paul/Wouters
and provided the patch as a workaround after discovering what he thinks is just
a bug in ipsec-tools (although in an email to me he admits
Public bug reported:
Update manager keeps pointing out that samba has unmet dependencies, so
I decided to remove it. Here is what happens:
$ sudo apt-get remove libpam-smbpass samba
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017237
Title:
package libpam-smbpass 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed pre-removal script returned
Evaluating for SRU to precise since this is a huge missing piece of the
EC2 API
** Also affects: txaws (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: txaws (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Also affects: txaws (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Please see the first two questions on
https://answers.launchpad.net/maas/+faqs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015207
Title:
juju setup fails, ERROR Invalid SSH key -
Looks like smbd starts before cups. Change start on parameter in
/etc/init/smbd.conf to start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up
and started cups) solved the problem for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
It's not reproducable, though I have seen it occur on multiple occasions
on different machines. It was occurring when trying to run a euca-bundle
command in the guest this time, which I guess was calling bzip at some
point. Predictably it only occurs when the guest is under any load.
The CentOS
[Expired for openldap (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
25 matches
Mail list logo
