[Bug 1795321] Re: FTBFS with MySQL 8.0

2020-02-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This was fixed in 0.9.0-6ubuntu2 ** Changed in: libdbi-drivers (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to libdbi-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795321 Title: FTBFS

[Bug 1863677] [NEW] fence_scsi needs lvm2 package so it should depend on it

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Public bug reported: Playing with fence_scsi I have noticed that one of my images did not have lvm2 package installed. With that, the following error ocurred: $ sudo fence_scsi -n clufocal03 --action=status 2020-02-17 19:57:02,324 ERROR: Unable to run /sbin/vgs --noheadings --separator : --sort

[Bug 1863527] Re: tgt man page points to non existent example config file

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Thanks christian, you are right. I opened this in rush thinking about not forgetting it when doing the fixes after the freeze. /usr/share/doc/tgt/examples/targets.conf.example <- here you go, as you said! Not sure I should worry about changing the man page about it or not. In this case, for

[Bug 1863688] Re: tgt should support Persistent Reserve Out (5Fh) PREEMPT AND ABORT (05h) service

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
I'm also setting this bug to affect fence-agents as it could provide some workaround for Persistent Reserve Out (5Fh) without the preempt and abort support (also as a whishlist, and for documentation purposes). ** Also affects: fence-agents (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 1863688] [NEW] tgt should support Persistent Reserve Out (5Fh) PREEMPT AND ABORT (05h) service

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Public bug reported: When using TGT to serve iSCSI targets/luns to a corosync/pacemaker cluster, if one wants to use "fence_scsi" to fence the shared disk for a particular node it won't be able to as tgt does not implement the PREEMPT AND ABORT (05h) service. A error like this will occur: $

[Bug 1863437] Re: [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Merged and uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863437 Title: [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1863437] Re: [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Upstream already had the following commit (since @vorlon opened the bug in January): commit 543574f18 Author: Ferenc Wágner Date: Thu Jan 9 14:19:19 2020 Omit pacemaker{, -cli-utils, -remote} on Ubuntu/i386 Closes: #948379 diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index

[Bug 1863437] Re: [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages

2020-02-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
https://salsa.debian.org/ha-team/pacemaker/merge_requests/1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863437 Title: [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages To