[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Can somebody explain, is this bug fixed in hardy packages? A lot of comments, and not a single clear report!!! If it is not fixed... Is there a patch for local script in initramfs- tools and mdadm or is there any rebuilt package with the fixes? Currently in Hardy i got: ~$ apt-cache policy mdadm mdadm: Installed: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy initramfs-tools initramfs-tools: Installed: 0.85eubuntu39.2 Candidate: 0.85eubuntu39.2 Version table: *** 0.85eubuntu39.2 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.85eubuntu36 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages ~$ apt-cache policy mdadm mdadm: Installed: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Thank you in advance! -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 187971] Re: Samba randomly doesn't connect to local server
After 171 days of being expired, I'm going to assume that this bug has been fixed. Most likely in the hardware networking. Feel free to set the status back to New if it is still an issue. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Samba randomly doesn't connect to local server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 159364] Re: Fails to install in 7.04
I believe the reporter has confirmed that this issue has been resolved. If not, please set the status back to New. ** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Fails to install in 7.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to sysstat in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 275608] Re: nm-openvpn swaps ca-cert and user-cert labels when using Passwords with Certificate (TLS) mode
Bug 280265 is not really a duplicate, but since that touches the same panel it should probably be fixed at the same time. Will update title to reflect that. The Passwords with Certificates (TLS) config panel not only inverts the labels/fileselectors, it also inverts the password fields when it saves them. Reproduction: Create a VPN in Passwords with Certificates (TLS) mode : User name: foo Password: foo CA Certificate: ca.crt User Certificate: user.crt Certificate password: bar Private Key: user.key Click Validate, close the panel Reedit that connection, the panel now reads: User name: foo Password: bar CA Certificate: ca.crt User Certificate: user.crt Certificate password: foo Private Key: user.key (NB: if you validate it again without changing anything and reopen it, it's back to what you originally typed :) ** Summary changed: - nm-openvpn swaps ca-cert and user-cert labels when using Passwords with Certificate (TLS) mode + nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords -- nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
This annoying bug is known for a very long time now. I wonder why nothing has been done yet! -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249706] Re: ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:)
I don't use a patch system for openssh, and would prefer you not to introduce one. -- ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249706] Re: ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:)
** Changed in: openssh Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280428] Re: Prompted for VPN (openvpn) user info at boot-up
Though the right solution is to do some /etc/default/openvpn configuration (see related answer), it might be a good idea to preserve hardy's behavior in that case. This difference in behavior was introduced when we merged the fix for the following Debian bug : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454371 In hardy, VPNs needing some password to start would just fail to autostart on boot. -- Prompted for VPN (openvpn) user info at boot-up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249706] Re: ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:)
As I said in the Debian BTS, perhaps ssh itself should do this, rather
than ssh-copy-id? You apparently ignored this comment. That said, that
seems to be fiddly and maybe isn't worth it.
Your patch introduces 'set -ex'. -e doesn't make any difference in this
code, and -x is noisy.
Your patch doesn't follow the indentation convention in that file. You
should always follow the prevailing convention.
It would be better just to strip colons at the end, rather than
throughout (which could produce very confusing results!). For that, just
replacing $1 with ${1%:} would be entirely sufficient; you don't need to
introduce another shell variable. (And why export HOSTNAME? Nothing
outside this script needs it.)
In future, consider writing this instead of introducing an unnecessary
call to the '[' program:
-if [ `echo $1 |grep -c \: -` ]; then
+if echo $1 | grep -q :; then
In the end, I've applied the attached patch to my Debian CVS repository.
Thanks for nudging this along.
** Attachment added: 249706.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18364548/249706.patch
** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #1530
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1530
** Also affects: openssh via
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1530
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin Watson (kamion)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280712] [NEW] Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When accessing printing properties for some drivers (Xerox and HP Designjet) the load on the CPU goes way up (90%). There is a latency of 30 to 60 seconds during this time. Other drivers (Ricoh) do not exhibit this behaviour. This has been observed on versions of Samba = 3.0.28 . ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 277103] Re: [intrepid] freeradius modules are missing
This bug was fixed in the package freeradius - 2.1.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2 --- freeradius (2.1.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low * Add missing /etc/freeradius/modules directory. (LP: #277103) -- Chuck Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:00:42 -0400 ** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- [intrepid] freeradius modules are missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227848] Re: boot order wrong for iscsi
** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Critical Target: None = ubuntu-8.10 -- boot order wrong for iscsi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 279655] Re: [FFe] Merge openvpn 2.1_rc11-1 from Debian
This bug was fixed in the package openvpn - 2.1~rc11-1ubuntu1 --- openvpn (2.1~rc11-1ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low * Merge with Debian (LP: #279655), remaining diffs: - debian/openvpn.init.d: Added 'status' action to init script, show per-VPN result messages and add --script-security 2 by default for backwards compatibility - debian/control: Added lsb-base=3.2-14 depend to allow status_of_proc() * Fixes regression when calling commands with arguments (LP: #277447) -- Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:30:44 +0200 ** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [FFe] Merge openvpn 2.1_rc11-1 from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 278784] Re: openvpn configuration with token (pkcs11 provider) blocks the boot
A few clarifications : in hardy openvpn also autostarts all
/etc/openvpn/*.conf VPNs at boot (if /etc/default/openvpn has
AUTOSTART=all, which is the default) so there is no change in that area.
However, one difference between the hardy and the intrepid version is that we
merged the fix for the following Debian bug :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454371
This causes OpenVPN to stop the boot process to ask for passwords (see
also bug 280428). It may also cause the PKCS#11-related hang, but I miss
some hardware to reproduce.
Jonathan: since we may consider it a good thing to revert that change,
I'm interested in knowing if that would fix this bug or not. Could you
please test if your PKCS#11 configuration, with AUTOSTART=all, block the
boot with the following change in /etc/init.d/openvpn :
---
--- /etc/init.d/openvpn.old
+++ /etc/init.d/openvpn
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
else
$DAEMON $OPTARGS --writepid /var/run/openvpn.$NAME.pid \
$DAEMONARG $STATUSARG --cd $CONFIG_DIR \
- --config $CONFIG_DIR/$NAME.conf $script_security || STATUS=1
+ --config $CONFIG_DIR/$NAME.conf $script_security /dev/null ||
STATUS=1
fi
}
stop_vpn () {
---
(add /dev/null after $script_security on line 69)
Thanks in advance for your testing.
--
openvpn configuration with token (pkcs11 provider) blocks the boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 275608] Re: nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords
Hi, Un-subscribing the sponsors at your request. Please re-subscribe when ready. Thanks, James -- nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
Same problem here -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 262251] Re: phpize: configure:8184: error: possibly undefined macro: _LT_SET_OPTIONS
Thank you, Pyry and Bogdan I have same problem when I want to build WSO2 WSF/PHP 2.0 from sources under ubuntu 8.10 checking Whether to enable WSF/PHP Support... yes, shared ./configure: line 5420: LTOPTIONS_VERSION: command not found ./configure: line 5421: LTSUGAR_VERSION: command not found ./configure: line 5422: LTVERSION_VERSION: command not found ./configure: line 5423: LTOBSOLETE_VERSION: command not found checking for a sed that does not truncate output... (cached) /bin/sed ./configure: line 5513: syntax error near unexpected token `lt_decl_varnames,' ./configure: line 5513: `lt_if_append_uniq(lt_decl_varnames, SED, , ,' configure: error: /bin/bash './configure' failed for src Now its work! -- phpize: configure:8184: error: possibly undefined macro: _LT_SET_OPTIONS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280814] [NEW] Correct man page for uid and gid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba According to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.17/+bug/48418 , uid and gid are not ignored any more when linux extensions are enabled. This contradicts the man pages of mount.cifs. Please correct the man pages. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: New ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- Correct man page for uid and gid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
On Thursday 09 October 2008, Stanislav Sushkov wrote: Can somebody explain, is this bug fixed in hardy packages? A lot of comments, and not a single clear report!!! If it is not fixed... Is there a patch for local script in initramfs- tools and mdadm or is there any rebuilt package with the fixes? Currently in Hardy i got: ~$ apt-cache policy mdadm mdadm: Installed: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy initramfs-tools initramfs-tools: Installed: 0.85eubuntu39.2 Candidate: 0.85eubuntu39.2 Version table: *** 0.85eubuntu39.2 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.85eubuntu36 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages ~$ apt-cache policy mdadm mdadm: Installed: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 0 500 http://ro.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Thank you in advance! It's not fixed in hardy LTS, which is very strange... ace -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Can you point to a wiki page or a comment in this thread where I'll find a solution for hardy? Or I should install Intrepid packages? Thank you. On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:14 +, Dustin Kirkland wrote: This is fixed in Intrepid, not in Hardy. :-Dustin -- () Campania Panglicii în ASCII /\ http://stas.nerd.ro/ascii/ -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dustin I love the work that you've put in to this but I need to stand by Ace Suares and for a LTS version it should be fixed. It prevents me to use ubuntu for my servers which uses software raid. The ones with hardware raid could use ubuntu. But sticking with debian for the moment because of this. If hardy wasn't a LTS version I would understand when you would just say upgrade to ... -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280712] Re: Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU
Peter, We had discussed this on IRC and it appeared this might be the same as upstream bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5372; but a closer examination shows that the upstream fix is only for the Printers and Faxes page, not the property pages for individual printers. So I'm afraid I have to conclude that this is not the same bug, I also can't find any other bugs referenced in the Samba 3.0.x changelogs that would fit this description, so I'm afraid we don't have an SRU candidate here at this point. I can try to track this down in the Samba 3.0/3.2 commit history later, but a concrete pointer from upstream would be helpful. -- Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Just post a file with patch which works for hardy, and that's all folks :) -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280712] Re: Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU
Nope. I've reviewed all the 3.0.x changelogs subsequent to 3.0.28a, and see no mention of a corresponding fix; and the delta to 3.2 is significant so it will take some time to track this down (once I have time available) without a more precise pointer. -- Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 275608] Re: nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords
Fix for both issues in the panel. network-manager-openvpn (0.7~~svn20080928t225540-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low * debian/patches/07_fileselectors_order.diff: Fix ordering of certificate file selectors in the Passwords with certificates case (LP: #275608) * debian/patches/08_passwords_unswap.diff: Fix passwords swapping when reloading a Passwords with certificates configuration (same bug number) ** Attachment added: network-manager-openvpn_0.7~~svn20080928t225540-0ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18375006/network-manager-openvpn_0.7%7E%7Esvn20080928t225540-0ubuntu2.debdiff ** Changed in: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu) Assignee: Thierry Carrez (tcarrez) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249706] Re: ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:)
** Changed in: openssh (Debian) Status: New = Fix Committed -- ssh-copy-id fails when run with colon (:) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 275608] Re: nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords
Hey Thierry, Thanks for the fixes. Have you posted these on the nm mailing list or in a bug report. I saw for the first problem you picked up the patch of the mailing list, but it didn't seem to get any comment. I'd like to get some review for these patches if possible. Thanks, James -- nm-openvpn Passwords with Certificate (TLS) panel has wrong labels and inverts passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 259110] Re: [SRU] Samba NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_MUST_CHANGE bug
Any chance to test this soon, and get the patch uploaded to intrepid, too? Intrepid is close to release, and there is another samba update waiting in the queue already (bug 236830). -- [SRU] Samba NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_MUST_CHANGE bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 236830] Re: cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Looks ok to me. I pinged bug 259110 for testers, if it can be tested soon and we can move the current samba SRU to -updates first, I'd prefer waiting a bit instead of stacking SRUs on top of each other. -- cifs does not support kerberos authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
On Thursday 09 October 2008, Stanislav Sushkov wrote: Just post a file with patch which works for hardy, and that's all folks :) No it's not. There is a procedure for that, so it will be updated automatically. That procedure I followed but at some point in the procedure, powers of 'normal' people are insufficient. We have to find an overlord who will sponsor the process and move it forward. Even the developer who made the patch for Ibex, can not move this forward on his own. Where are the Power Puff Girls when you need them ? -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
You mean this procedure? It didn't work for me. I mean I patched my local manually, but it broke my init image in /boot after update-initramfs... Maybe I the patch really works, but no one from this thread reported it as a solution... On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:37 +, Ace Suares wrote: On Thursday 09 October 2008, Stanislav Sushkov wrote: Just post a file with patch which works for hardy, and that's all folks :) No it's not. There is a procedure for that, so it will be updated automatically. That procedure I followed but at some point in the procedure, powers of 'normal' people are insufficient. We have to find an overlord who will sponsor the process and move it forward. Even the developer who made the patch for Ibex, can not move this forward on his own. Where are the Power Puff Girls when you need them ? -- () Campania Panglicii în ASCII /\ http://stas.nerd.ro/ascii/ -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Fixing Hardy would mean, at the very least: 1) porting the patches for: * mdadm * initramfs-tools * grub * grub-installer 2) Rebuilding the installation ISO's. 3) Obsessively regression testing the new install media. After Intrepid releases on October 30, 2008, I will spend a few cycles considering the port to Hardy 8.04.2. No guarantees, but rest assured that I am a Canonical/Ubuntu Server developer, who runs Hardy+RAID on my own systems, and have plenty of motivation to see this fixed. If anyone wants to volunteer to do (1), that would help move things along. And I certainly hope at the very least some of you are willing to help with (3). :-Dustin p.s. Please understand that your sarcasm is completely unappreciated. -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dustin, what about those packages for ibex. If I update my hardy with those, so I risk serious troubles? Or it is not possible cause of difference between kernels? Someone did this before? On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:21 +, Dustin Kirkland wrote: Dustin -- () Campania Panglicii în ASCII /\ http://stas.nerd.ro/ascii/ -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dustin, I am glad you may be spending some time on this bug. You mention rebuilding ISO's. But why can't it just be an upgrade to the existing installations? I mean, on an existing system, all we need to do is upgrade ? Also, I am not being sarcastic at all, when I say that I can not understand that there needs to be so much regression testing for the patch that removes the bug, since to introduce the bug was possible at all. The bug is not present in Debian, and was not present in Dapper. Anyway, I am going to install the workaround on all my affected machines because I cannot wait that long. (But then I will get some trouble when an update finally comes around..). And I am not going to advice using Ubuntu for servers that use software raid anymore. I am really disappointed in the way this is going. I am happy it will be fixed in Ibex tough. Just keep smiling... I am also unsubscribing from this bug. I feel that I am becoming unconstructive. -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dustin, I've been doing sysadmin work for 15 years. I chose to try out Ubuntu for a home RAID server project, and loaded up Hardy as it was an LTS edition. In my first day working with Ubuntu, I ran into this bug, a bug where the version of mdadm (pretty well out of date) on Hardy was unable to resume a RAID reshape operation, and the ext2resize tools incorrectly detect the RAID stride. All of these bugs are BASIC functionality of the storage management tools which should have never made it through any sort of QA. I reported all of them as bugs, and this is the ONLY one which has even recieved a developer response after 2 months. For a Long Term Support edition, that's shameful. Not only that, but a bug which in a COMMON situation can prevent boot and your response as to whether a fix will be backported is I'll spend a few cycles considering backporting it Your lack of understanding for someone's sarcasm is completely unjustified, and the level of developer/bugfix support I'm seeing for Ubuntu is pathetic. With this level of support, using Ubuntu for any sort of a corporate server application would be a really poor decision. -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227848] Re: boot order wrong for iscsi
The patch sent by Dustin already changes the open-iscsi script from S25 to S47, and (as we saw here) it seems that this is enough to mount any storage volume after the network is up. However, the original open-iscsi script position (S25) is before S45 (waitnfs) and S46 (mountnfs-bootclean), and in a case where one uses ordinary interfaces (as said in two posts above), udev makes everything work and so any NFS filesystems get mounted. But now (with the patch), open-iscsi will load AFTER the NFS scripts. Wouldn't be better to move the open-iscsi script to a value between 40 and 45 (40 open-iscsi 45), BEFORE the NFS scripts, allowing to be mounted over iSCSI volumes ? -- boot order wrong for iscsi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sru. Please do not subscribe the SRU team to bugs that don't actually include proposed fixes to previous releases. a) this is not the documented procedure for SRU fixes, b) the SRU team has other things to do that actually benefit Ubuntu users, instead of following a bug report that consists of lambasting Ubuntu for a bug that the relevant developers have already agreed should receive attention. With regard to the last, I've accepted the nomination for hardy based on Dustin's statement that he'll work on this for 8.04.2. Ross, as for the other bugs you mentioned: the ext2resize package is not part of Ubuntu main, which means it's not part of the set of software supported by Canonical. It's a third-party tool that ext3 upstream has repeatedly recommended against using. The package from Debian is included in the universe repository in the hope that it's useful to someone, but there is no one at all in Ubuntu tending that package - there's no reason to think it was subjected to any QA for it to fail. If you believe this problem makes the package unusable, then I'm happy to escalate bug #256669 and have the ext2resize package removed from subsequent Ubuntu releases. ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 115475] Re: tproxy support (iptables squid)
Developers at the recent netfilter summit concluded that patch-o-matic was likely to go away, though tproxy development looks interesting. ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- tproxy support (iptables squid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115475 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
