[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
Hi I have read through this bug with some interest and tried to add the libsmbclient suggested above and was told a newer version was already installed... I have a similar problem as reported initially and a real Linux Noob.. I was hoping the patch downloaded today would fix things but no joy.. g...@gary-laptop:~$ smbclient -V Version 3.2.3 My proceedings are as follows in a shell g...@gary-laptop:~$ smbclient //NASSTORE/PUBLIC -W SHAZ -U gary Enter gary's password: Domain=[ȇ] OS=[] Server=[���] smb: \ ls cli_list_new: Error: unable to parse name from info level 1 Segmentation fault g...@gary-laptop:~$ the system logs this Jan 6 21:58:53 gary-laptop kernel: [ 3969.498048] smbclient[6183]: segfault at 0 ip b7ad42c3 sp bfed5f3c error 4 in libc-2.8.90.so[b7a5d000+158000] I can mkdir and cd etc but no access to file listings. Nautilus just re-directs itself to my home page. my NAS is a NexStarLX with the latest firmware Version installed which is like dated 2006-10-9 which doesnt really fill me with much warmth but I do knw this drive did work with a previous debian installation I had. not sure of the version. Funny old thing is the Solaris installation I tried also failed to access the NAS. (I have been trying out versions untill I found one I like.) (Ubuntu 8.10 seems to be the winner bar this samba problem :( ) I havent tried the gvs stuff yet.. but will ry and pick through it. Happy New year to you all. Gary.. -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
Grobot, your smbclient problem is fixed with the fix to bug #264943. -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 296327] Re: smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 305030 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305030 I don't know what I want you to test since your report is not clear to me. There's bug 305030 about not being able to print from GTK+ apps (including Evince). The problem you report here is not a standard usecase, this is why I marked your bug as a duplicate. In bug 305030 you'll find more informations. -- smb:/// No application is registered as handling this file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314318] Re: Samba update crashed
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20942404/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20942405/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- Samba update crashed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 312449] Re: package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Similar message received with 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 sudo dpkg --configure -a Setting up samba-common (2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4) ... Not replacing deleted config file /etc/samba/smb.conf chmod: cannot access `/etc/samba/smb.conf': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing samba-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of smbclient: smbclient depends on samba-common (= 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4); however: Package samba-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing smbclient (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libpam-smbpass: libpam-smbpass depends on samba-common (= 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4); however: Package samba-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libpam-smbpass (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of winbind: winbind depends on samba-common (= 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4); however: Package samba-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing winbind (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of smbfs: smbfs depends on samba-common (= 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4); however: Package samba-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing smbfs (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: samba-common smbclient libpam-smbpass winbind smbfs Copying smb.conf from a backup resolved problem, but I would have prefered that the upgrade process coped with the file being missing, by recreating the default smb.conf file. -- package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314411] [NEW] logrotate cron spams when only apache2.2-common installed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 When only the apache2.2-common package is left installed (at least in hardy), I get an email fron cron every day saying: /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: error: error accessing /var/log/apache2: No such file or directory error: apache2:1 glob failed for /var/log/apache2/*.log One solution would be to have the package that installs the /var/log/apache2 directory also install the /etc/logrotate.d/apache2 file. ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- logrotate cron spams when only apache2.2-common installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314411 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
darn, the samba update from Jan 05 (http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-702-1) overwrites Thierrys PPA :-S So atm I can't tell if this patch fixes this problem with my Iomega Home Network Harddrive, but I guess it would :} I so hope this patch can be included into the normal ubuntu packages soon... -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 153863] Re: /etc/init.d/apache2 restart produces error
I've just been googling this error message and was brought here - I'm getting this message in Ubuntu Kubuntu 7.10 GUTSY Linux: 2.6.22-16-generic I get this when attempting to stop apache2 (or restart) sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 stop == error.log == [Tue Jan 06 15:48:48 2009] [notice] caught SIGWINCH, shutting down gracefully [Tue Jan 06 15:48:48 2009] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) [Tue Jan 06 15:48:48 2009] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) [Tue Jan 06 15:48:48 2009] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) [Tue Jan 06 15:48:48 2009] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) [Tue Jan 06 15:48:48 2009] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) I found this coz I'm having other errors to do with configuring multiple SSL hosts (with multiple IPs) under a single apache installation. I do not know if this error message is related to my SSL problem - yet - but is there a simple way to fix this problem without taking the full risk involved with going over to Hardy Heron? Thanks, Sean -- /etc/init.d/apache2 restart produces error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246324] Re: initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't
** Also affects: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 286119] Re: firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w images: 8.10beta AMD64
Well, I noticed a performance degrade with FF3, but other than that, I did not see a problem. I did not see yet a need for using nmblookup. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Leon l...@tim-online.nl wrote: Removing wins indeed work. But now I have to use nmblookup seperately to get an ip address :) -- firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w images: 8.10beta AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. Status in Samba: In Progress Status in firefox-3.0 source package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in samba source package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in firefox-3.0 in Ubuntu Intrepid: Invalid Status in samba in Ubuntu Intrepid: Triaged Status in firefox-3.0 in Ubuntu Jaunty: Invalid Status in samba in Ubuntu Jaunty: Triaged Status in samba source package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: Basically the same stacktrace on most pages. Is NOT tied to Flash (have tried w Flash installed and removed). Not usable, using Firefox under Wine as workaround (ick!) *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/firefox: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x7f2a04430cb0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f2a1c268938] /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x76)[0x7f2a1c26af86] /usr/lib/libtalloc.so.1(talloc_free+0x128)[0x7f2a0a085b88] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2[0x7f2a0b2d8f48] /usr/lib/libtalloc.so.1(talloc_free+0x232)[0x7f2a0a085c92] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(alloc_sub_basic+0x8e9)[0x7f2a0b300cb2] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(talloc_sub_basic+0x24)[0x7f2a0b30121d] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2[0x7f2a0b250be9] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(lp_lockdir+0x1e)[0x7f2a0b251a93] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(lock_path+0x9)[0x7f2a0b2fb922] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(receive_unexpected+0x2c)[0x7f2a0b2a6321] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(receive_nmb_packet+0x3b)[0x7f2a0b2a8d2e] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(name_query+0x303)[0x7f2a0b2ab530] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(_nss_wins_gethostbyname_r+0x2c8)[0x7f2a0b24e202] /lib/libnss_wins.so.2(_nss_wins_gethostbyname2_r+0x2b)[0x7f2a0b24e484] /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f2a1c2bcf73] /lib/libc.so.6(getaddrinfo+0x1de)[0x7f2a1c2be96e] /usr/lib/libnspr4.so.0d(PR_GetAddrInfoByName+0x108)[0x7f2a1b916828] /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.3/libxul.so[0x7f2a1aa2250a] /usr/lib/libnspr4.so.0d[0x7f2a1b922dc3] /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x7f2a1cf163ea] /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f2a1c2d5c6d] === Memory map: 0040-00408000 r-xp 08:02 534609 /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/firefox 00608000-00609000 r--p 8000 08:02 534609 /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/firefox 00609000-0060a000 rw-p 9000 08:02 534609 /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/firefox 01be5000-0356 rw-p 01be5000 00:00 0 [heap] 40da5000-40da6000 ---p 40da5000 00:00 0 40da6000-415a6000 rw-p 40da6000 00:00 0 41745000-41746000 ---p 41745000 00:00 0 41746000-41f46000 rw-p 41746000 00:00 0 41f46000-41f47000 ---p 41f46000 00:00 0 41f47000-42747000 rw-p 41f47000 00:00 0 42747000-42748000 ---p 42747000 00:00 0 42748000-42f48000 rw-p 42748000 00:00 0 42f48000-42f49000 ---p 42f48000 00:00 0 42f49000-43749000 rw-p 42f49000 00:00 0 43749000-4374a000 ---p 43749000 00:00 0 4374a000-43f4a000 rw-p 4374a000 00:00 0 43f4a000-43f4b000 ---p 43f4a000 00:00 0 43f4b000-4474b000 rw-p 43f4b000 00:00 0 4474b000-4474c000 ---p 4474b000 00:00 0 4474c000-44f4c000 rw-p 4474c000 00:00 0 44f4c000-44f4d000 ---p 44f4c000 00:00 0 44f4d000-4574d000 rw-p 44f4d000 00:00 0 4574d000-4574e000 ---p 4574d000 00:00 0 4574e000-45f4e000 rw-p 4574e000 00:00 0 45f4e000-45f4f000 ---p 45f4e000 00:00 0 45f4f000-4674f000 rw-p 45f4f000 00:00 0 4674f000-4675 ---p 4674f000 00:00 0 4675-46f5 rw-p 4675 00:00 0 46f5-46f51000 ---p 46f5 00:00 0 46f51000-47751000 rw-p 46f51000 00:00 0 47751000-47752000 ---p 47751000 00:00 0 47752000-47f52000 rw-p 47752000 00:00 0 7f2a0400-7f2a04487000 rw-p 7f2a0400 00:00 0 7f2a04487000-7f2a0800 ---p 7f2a04487000 00:00 0 7f2a0939b000-7f2a093f2000 r--p 08:06 327801 /home/reardon/.fonts/tahomabd.ttf 7f2a093f2000-7f2a0945 r--p 08:06 327803 /home/reardon/.fonts/tahoma.ttf 7f2a0945-7f2a09454000 r-xp 08:02 1687642 /lib/libnss_dns-2.8.90.so 7f2a09454000-7f2a09654000 ---p 4000 08:02 1687642 /lib/libnss_dns-2.8.90.so 7f2a09654000-7f2a09655000 r--p 4000 08:02 1687642 /lib/libnss_dns-2.8.90.so 7f2a09655000-7f2a09656000 rw-p 5000 08:02 1687642 /lib/libnss_dns-2.8.90.so 7f2a09656000-7f2a09658000 r-xp 08:02 1687646 /lib/libnss_mdns4_minimal.so.2 7f2a09658000-7f2a09857000 ---p 2000 08:02 1687646 /lib/libnss_mdns4_minimal.so.2 7f2a09857000-7f2a09858000 rw-p 1000 08:02 1687646 /lib/libnss_mdns4_minimal.so.2 7f2a09858000-7f2a0985a000 r-xp 08:02 2064518 /usr/lib/gconv/IBM850.so 7f2a0985a000-7f2a09a59000 ---p 2000 08:02 2064518 /usr/lib/gconv/IBM850.so 7f2a09a59000-7f2a09a5a000 r--p 1000 08:02 2064518 /usr/lib/gconv/IBM850.so
[Bug 249337] Re: bash get_cword: command not found
Thanks, debdiff looks good. Uploaded. ** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- bash get_cword: command not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249337 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249337] Re: bash get_cword: command not found
This bug was fixed in the package bash-completion - 20060301-4ubuntu3 --- bash-completion (20060301-4ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low * Fix IFS issue in _umount and correct _get_cword in _postfix (LP: #249337) -- Martin Mai martinmai1...@web.de Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:31:39 + ** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- bash get_cword: command not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249337 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314494] [NEW] Cant install samba
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Changed samba share folder and it quit being visible to the network. I thought there was something wrong with samba so I uninstalled with the intentions of reinstalling it immediately however I get an error every time I try to do so. I am using Ubuntu 8.10 ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- Cant install samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314494] Re: Changed samba share folder and it quit being visable to the network. I thought there was something wrong with samba so I deinstalled and now I get an error everytime I try to reinstal
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20958193/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20958194/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Summary changed: - Changed samba share folder and it quit being visable to the network. I thought there was something wrong with samba so I deinstalled and now I get an error everytime I try to reinstall it. + Cant install samba -- Cant install samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 286119] Re: firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w images: 8.10beta AMD64
Hi, Can you try the samba-3.2.3 version in my ppa (http://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive) when its available? Thanks chuck -- firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w images: 8.10beta AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Same thing for me, I am sorry to say. Packard Bell Netstore 3500, 8.10 amd64 Similar behaviour as ever: Nautilus bounces back to /home/user smbclient on the commandline gives errormessages. i.e. tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access rights within the specified context for the requested function. The context is defined by the TID or the UID.) or at smbclient -L : Domain=[ȇ] OS=[] Server=[���] So long Rudy 2009/1/6 Daniel Eckl daniel.e...@gmx.de: darn, the samba update from Jan 05 (http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-702-1) overwrites Thierrys PPA :-S So atm I can't tell if this patch fixes this problem with my Iomega Home Network Harddrive, but I guess it would :} I so hope this patch can be included into the normal ubuntu packages soon... -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. Status in Samba: Fix Released Status in samba source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in samba source package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: Binary package hint: gvfs Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 $ uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.27-2-generic #1 SMP Thu Aug 28 17:20:02 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux I just tried to open a network folder in nautilus by typing smb://192.168.1.100 then gvfs crashed ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-smb NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gvfs-backends 0.99.6-0ubuntu3 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-smb --spawner :1.79 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/3 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/home/User Name/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gvfs StacktraceTop: strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 strdup () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?? () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 Title: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() Uname: Linux 2.6.27-2-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
The latest official Ubuntu Samba update regresses the one in Thierry's ppa repository. I used Synaptic Package Manager to force the Samba packages back to the ones from Thierry's ppa and then used Synaptic again to lock those versions so they won't be upgraded via Intrepid- Updates again. You might want to do the same. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314494] Re: Cant install samba
Thanks for submitting this bug in efforts to help improve Ubuntu. Did you completely remove or purge samba-common? Can you try running: sudo apt-get purge samba-common . Thanks, Marking incomplete while waiting for the answer. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Cant install samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 82853] Re: Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay
I've reworked Pat's files into a patch against Ubuntu slapd source package 2.4.9-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 It's much more Debian-ized, except that there are still hacks since upstream source doesn't use autoconf to build this module. It produces an extra package slapd-smbk5pwd, that can be installed without any of the other packages that get build; you can use the ones from hardy-updates for slapd etc. I did this so that any security updates won't cause slapd-smbk5pwd to get uninstalled and bring down authentication services. I suppose there are other means of doing Single-Sign-On, but this one works now. Samba4 could shake things up in the area of SSO, of course it uses Heimdal-kdc (internally by default), so this module might live on even if it only gives slapd itsself integrated authentication with AD DC. ** Attachment added: Patch against Hardy slapd source to build smbk5pwd overlay module http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20965327/build_smbk5pwd_1.patch -- Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 273486] Re: Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 255368 ebox: Depends: libapache-authcookie-perl but it is not installable -- Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273486 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 192599] Re: GDM support for domain choice
** Changed in: gdm Status: Unknown = New -- GDM support for domain choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46
Hello Mathias and Team, After carefully reading the page you mention, I still fail to understand why dnsmasq 2.46 should not make its way to Hardy LTS at all. Since : - It IS also a security upgrade (should be raised above hardy's current version according to upstream's site). - No regression was introduced, as other distros have acknowledged, as your competitors' package listings show. The only 'valid' reason mentioned on this policy page would be : bugs that (a) are Fix Released in the current development release and (b) have been nominated but not approved for stable releases... although it remains unclear what exact policy applies in these cases. Moreover, this update would seem to qualify as a MicroException, in Ubuntu's own terms, provided the packagers actually can communicate with one another, which seems to be very much the case. All in all, what a disappointing answer! Not even a remote chance, either now or later! It makes it look like Ubuntu LTS is not even striving for production-ready status and that this claim as well as that of Long Term is but a slogan. Moreover, such a brisk invalidation of an otherwise valid report without even bothering to examine or answer the other arguments we gave regarding the benefits this update could bring to Ubuntu gives your company a bad name. Not to mention referring us to your policy page, since software quality and marketing have little to do with one another. It had been a hard time convincing several of our customers to switch to Ubuntu, and there will be no way for me or anyone else to talk them into accepting quick and dirty handmade non-supported backports like the one I made for this daemon and am currently using. Alas, the management's conclusions will likely highly resemble mine above: not production-ready, not an LTS release but for the name. (Please note this is not the first issue of this kind we've come across, only the first one reported, and that it used to seem - from testing previous releases since the not-production-ready-either dapper drake - that Ubuntu's maintainers were among the most reactive). Still hoping at the very least for an officially supported backport... And at best for more sensible consideration, i.e. a detailed answer to the reasons we formerly gave for this request, which ideally would match Ubuntu's claims to quality. Meanwhile (if so) I remain terribly sorry for this lack of concern towards quality and human consideration. Regards, Dr. Moe In a democratic community, nagging may seem an appropriate response to contempt. Rvd. J. Barley Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 15:44 +, Mathias Gug a écrit : On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:38PM -, dr.moe wrote: _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the regular LTS repos ? So please let me know if inclusion in the main Hardy repos could be considered at all (there may be something I missed here...) I don't think so. Criteria for making Stable Release Updates are outlined on the following wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Hi Thierry, Thanks for forwarding. Looking forward to the backporters' response. _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the regular LTS repos ? I must stress again that this would be an important improvement for LTS. To summarize: - if any dnsmasq user wants / needs to use a cname directive, v2.46 is required. - the question was asked several times in the past in every ubuntu forum whose language I can read (many times, that is...) - beginners won't backport - more experienced users may find it a waste of time to backport, and their work may not benefit to the community (I just backported, clumsily, and would not submit this work for anybody else's use unless someone officially in charge would take the time to validate / improve this backport). - anyone not directly involved in Ubuntu will not want to backport every single daemon in order to stick to the LTS release (I have backported 3 different servers last month, and this is not my idea of a Xmas holiday ;-). - LBNL who'd want the hassle of installing and configuring bind solely in order to declare a CNAME (or any number of them)? (or any other DNS server 4 that matter...) I probably should not have mentioned the backports repo in my previous message ; getting v2.46 there would surely be better than not at all on Hardy, _nonetheless_ the whole point should be to give _regular_ Hardy a simple DNS server with every function anyone would expect which works _out_of_the_box. So please let me know if inclusion in the main Hardy repos could be considered at all (there may be something I missed here...) Regards, Dr. Moe Redirecting to hardy-backports... Please see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports for more information on the backport process. ** Also affects: hardy-backports
[Bug 314620] [NEW] Please merge logwatch_7.3.6.cvs20080702-2(main) from Debian unstable (main).
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: logwatch Debian has a new version to be merged. logwatch (7.3.6.cvs20080702-2) unstable; urgency=low * add Michael Tautschnig to changelog of former version, crediting him for his hard work fixing the unknown copyright holders issue. * Fix manpage: - --filename instead of --save to save output to a file (closes: #441358) - --print no longer exists, output to stdout is now the default - Fix some formatting issues in the manpage (thanks again to Michael Tautschnig) * services/dpkg: Ignore some previously unknown lines (closes: #491972, thanks Jeremie Bouttier for the report) -- Willi Mann wi...@wm1.at Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:20:06 +0100 ** Affects: logwatch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- Please merge logwatch_7.3.6.cvs20080702-2(main) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Ross, this would make your system more insecure, since Thierrys packages don't include the security fixes for the USN mentioned in my comment above. Maybe you still want to do the same, but when posting workarounds, you should always mention the drawbacks. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 314623] [NEW] likewise-open: allows lockout while disconnected
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: likewise-open If a user enters an incorrect password too often while likewise-open is in cached/disconnected mode, it will lock the account. Unfortunately it then becomes impossible to access the account until it's authenticated against the domain again. Likewise should never lock out the cached accounts, or at least lockouts should be optional. ** Affects: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- likewise-open: allows lockout while disconnected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
