[Bug 330626] Re: 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update
I commented out the [printers] and [print$] statements and smb starts, but when I run smbtree, the following error is displayed: Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding And the logfile: [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) === [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 25511 (3.3.0) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(44) === [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1673) PANIC (pid 25511): internal error [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1777) BACKTRACE: 16 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x1c) [0x7fc574e185cd] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x5b) [0x7fc574e186db] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x7fc574e05dad] #3 /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x7fc5733e8080] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(file_load+0x1e) [0x7fc574e151d5] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(file_lines_load+0x1b) [0x7fc574e15241] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x7fc574ff71eb] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x7fc574ff7c4c] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(api_reply+0x3e6) [0x7fc574ff7018] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x7fc574ff2364] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(reply_trans+0x727) [0x7fc574ff312f] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x7fc574d2dadf] #12 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0xdc6) [0x7fc574d2f91d] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x20f4) [0x7fc574cfd9a0] #14 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x7fc57195a5a6] #15 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x7fc574cfad89] [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1678) smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 25511] [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1686) smb_panic(): action returned status 0 [2009/02/20 19:29:03, 0] lib/fault.c:dump_core(218) Can not dump core: corepath not set up -- 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330626 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 330626] Re: 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update
Confirming error, i even did a fresh install to check. Feb 20, jaunty x86_64 g...@greg-desktop:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/samba status * nmbd is running * smbd is not running g...@greg-desktop:~$ On my 32 bit machine the error does not occur. Is this possibly an AppArmor issue? -- 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330626 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 330626] Re: 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update
As mentioned by Andreas Olsson, I can confirm that commenting out the [Printers] section in smb.conf allowed smbd to start correctly on my system (Jaunty 64bit). -- 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330626 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 273486] Re: Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all
Please clarify status of ebox-usersandgroups fix in Jaunty. ** Also affects: ebox-usersandgroups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ebox-usersandgroups (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273486 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 273486] Re: Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all
Ah, comment 8 says it's fixed in Jaunty. ** Changed in: ebox-usersandgroups (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: ebox-usersandgroups (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273486 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 273486]
Accepted ebox-usersandgroups into intrepid-proposed; please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! -- Current eBox packages in intrepid don't work at all https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273486 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 314657] Re: smbd segfault in assert_uid
Mathias Gug wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Could you post your smb.conf file? When does the crash happen ? at startup? when a specific client connects? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete Good morning Mathias. config attached. Crash happens during access of files, the user may have been connected for some time. Not every file and I've not yet managed to find a pattern to which ones. It doesn't happen every session either. More than one user involved, though we don't have many, we're basically a Mac shop. One point - when browsing the bug database a week or so back I noticed another report that mentioned problems in a setup with NAS connected storage using a Qlogic fibre-channel adaptor. We have the same situation but with a different NAS device, although I've not noticed any problems with the other clients (most people connect via Netatalk due to Apple's UTF-8 handling differences) Keith -- Theme Group 3 4 Grove Park Waltham Road White Waltham MAIDENHEAD Berkshire England SL6 3LW E: keith.matth...@themegroup.com T: +44 (0) 1628 829090 F: +44 (0) 1628 828877 I: +44 (0) 1628 828899 http://www.themegroup.com http://www.themegroup.com/ Theme Group is a wholly owned trading style of This That '95 Limited. Registered in England No: 3092394 at 7/8 Eghams Court, Boston Drive, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire. SL8 5YS. This message and its attached file(s), is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person whom it is addressed. It may contain personal and confidential information and as such may be protected by the Data Protection Act 1998. If you received this message in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify us as soon as possible and delete it and any attached files from your system. Any views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the views held by Theme Group. As Internet communications are not secure we do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message nor responsibility for any change made to this message after the original sender sent it. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computer practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. We advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment, as Theme Group is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments. Thank you for taking the time to read this as it may have been a complete waste of your time. Very few people bother to read these things but it proves how special you are 'cause you have, so thanks again. Please take time to read our terms and conditions at www.themegroup.co.uk/terms.pdf blocked::blocked::http://www.themegroup.co.uk/terms.pdf http://www.themegroup.co.uk/terms.pdf --- ** Attachment added: smb.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22907536/smb.conf -- smbd segfault in assert_uid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 325193] Re: can not upgrade mysqld (jaunty)
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- can not upgrade mysqld (jaunty) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332030] [NEW] [sync request] Please sync nut 2.4.1 from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nut
- 2.4.1-1 is still in the Debian New Queue waiting for approval (it adds 1 more
binary package)
- 2.4.1-2 is underway, merging more Ubuntu patches and fixing some more bugs
(both Debian and Ubuntu)
DEBIAN CHANGELOG:
nut (2.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
* Acknowledge the use of debhelpers (Closes: #506583)
* debian/copyright: authors and licensing (GPL2+ and GPL3+) completion
* debian/control:
- add a Pre-Depends on debconf for nut and nut-cgi, and remove the according
Depends
- add ${misc:Depends} to all Depends
- add libpowerman0-dev to the Build-Depends
- add a new nut-powerman-pdu package
- add a Recommends on bash-completion for nut
- remove Shaul Karl from the Uploaders as per his request
* debian/nut-powerman-pdu.install, debian/nut-powerman-pdu.manpages: added for
the nut-powerman-pdu package
* debian/nut.install:
- also list the bash_completion entry
- list update due to upstream changes
* debian/nut.manpages: list update due to upstream changes
* debian/rules:
- comment the patching rules
- install the nut.bash_completion script
* debian/patches/*: removed the previous patches since fixed upstream
* debian/patches/01_snmp_ups_no_lcrypto.dpatch: add a patch to fix snmp-ups
overlinking with lcrypto (lintian possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl)
* debian/po/es.po: added Spanish debconf template translation (Closes:
512494)
* debian/po/ja.po: added Japanese debconf template translation (Closes:
512865)
* debian/watch: updated for the new 2.4 tree
* debian/nut.prerm: replace the direct call to the init script by invoke-rc.d
-- Arnaud Quette aque...@debian.org Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:15:24 +0100
** Affects: nut (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[sync request] Please sync nut 2.4.1 from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332032] [NEW] nut wrongly install nut-cgi's config files
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nut
The nut package wrongly includes the nut-cgi's config files.
This is due to nut.install listing /etc/ instead of listing precisely the right
config files in {nut,nut-cgi}.install.
This bug will be fixed by 2.4.1-2
** Affects: nut (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
nut wrongly install nut-cgi's config files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332032
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 189168] Re: Unable to view Window shares because of the default resolve order
** Summary changed: - unable to view windows shares because of the default resolve order + Unable to view Window shares because of the default resolve order -- Unable to view Window shares because of the default resolve order https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 189168] Re: unable to view windows shares because of the default resolve order
Perhaps this should also involve Network Manager (if in a Desktop context) to warn about it when this setting is detected. Use case 1: Matt want to use OpenDNS. He follows easy instruction to set it up. Later the same week he browses his network in nautilus. Nautilus makes a DNS request that should return an error, the DNS request doesn't fail, meaning the DNS server is configured in a way that requires changing resolve order in /etc/samba/smb.conf. A warning is presented asking to confirm the change, and explaining why it's needed, or asking to contact the system admin. Matt enters his password, the directive is changed, the samba service is restarted and expected functionality is restored. Use case 2: Matt want to use OpenDNS. He follows easy instruction to set it up. Nautilus (or else) opens immediately and makes a DNS request that should return an error, the DNS request doesn't fail, meaning the DNS server is configured in a way that requires changing resolve order in /etc/samba/smb.conf. A warning is presented asking to confirm the change, and explaining why it's needed, or asking to contact the system admin. Does that sound crazy ? I am told such DNS setups can be checked, I only use the make request, if it doesn't fail it's breaking local DNS analogy for illustration purposes. -- Unable to view Window shares because of the default resolve order https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302786] [NEW] PHP5 Realpath function
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
Package: php5
version: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.3
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release:8.04
Codename: hardy
PHP function realpath() does not function according to spec.
According to PHP.net's documentation:
==
realpath — Returns canonicalized absolute pathname
Returns the canonicalized absolute pathname on success. The resulting
path will have no symbolic link, '/./' or '/../' components.
realpath() returns FALSE on failure, e.g. if the file does not exist.
==
http://uk2.php.net/realpath
The problem is that in this version of PHP (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.3), realpath fails
to return FALSE if the file does not exist.
ie.
Code:
$a = /this/file/does/not/exist;
var_dump ( realpath ( $a ) );
Result:
string(25) /this/file/does/not/exist
Result should be:
bool(false)
Work around is to check if file exists:
$a = /this/file/does/not/exist;
var_dump ( realpath ( $a ) );
if ( true === file_exists ( $a ) ) {
$result = realpath ( $a );
} else {
$result = false;
}
var_dump ( $result );
But this is obviously a bug, which may cause many hard-to-trace bugs in many
frameworks, as they assume realpath works as it should according to PHP.net's
documentation. Therefore, I would probably escalate it as a serious bug.
** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: 8.04 hardy php5 realpath
--
PHP5 Realpath function
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302786
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server
Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302786] Re: PHP5 Realpath function
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in PHP5. For future reference you might be interested to know that a lot of applications have bug reporting functionality built in to them. This can be accessed via the Report a Problem option in the Help menu for the application with which you are having an issue. You can learn more about this feature at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = php5 -- PHP5 Realpath function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332087] [NEW] Disabling the default virtual host disables options on the root directory ('/').
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apache2-common
Problem:
Disabling the default virtual host enables 'AllowOverride Any' for the root
('/') directory and disables 'FollowSymlinks'.
This effects (at least) Hardy and Intrepid's versions of Apache2.
Overview:
The default Apache virtual host (/etc/apache2/sites-available/default)
has a 'Directory' option for the root directory (see below). By
disabling the default virtual host these directives and the protections
they offer are removed.
Directory /
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
/Directory
Applying options to the root directory should probably not be delegated to this
virtual host, even if the assumption is that the virtual host will not be
disabled.
Moving this section to /etc/apache2/apache2.conf file will not alter the
default configuration of the web server and will still protect the root
directory even if the default virtual host is removed.
Solution:
Move the 'Directory' directive for the root directory from the default
virtual host file to the apache2.conf file (probably above the
'AccessFileName' directives).
** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apache2 apache2-common
--
Disabling the default virtual host disables options on the root directory ('/').
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332087
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Blueprint ldap-defaultdit-usergrp-mgmt] Default LDAP DIT for user and group managment
Blueprint changed by .Ru: Whiteboard changed to: dendrobates: This is a good idea, but I would like to see a community discussion about DIT layout. i.e. the use of dc=example,dc=com, over o=example.com. I have almost always used dc, but not for any good reason. ru: having DIT in any form is very important for corporations. this feature can (in future) replace MS AD ecosystem. koptein: DIT and ldap means not (mail-, directory, or other) domains. dc=example,dc=com is for a domain, also o=example.com is a domain and both aren't very good for a bigger company structure. One example - for better clarification - i use .uk (or .de, nl, ...). If you start with dc=example,dc=uk and your company grow up with another location, say example.br, how can s/o layout this new structure. Same for o=example.uk and o= or ou= or c= ... example.br? Always a new DIT for a new location? The important thing is not the domain (whatever domain), is is the name of the structure, the comany. So for one of the best (L)DAP implementation (NDS or eDirectory) nearly everyone recomends an o=example -- without any com, org, net, uk, br, ... and other locations (or parts of an comypnay like sales, hr, stock, ...) are in the second level in the DIT, like ou=br. LDAP is not only for users and groups, what about computers, DNS, DHCP, Harddisk, Pools, Volumes (LVM), SoftwareRAID-Level, Rights, Clusterconfiguration, Loadbalancing, Routing, RIP, BGP, Applications and many more? Think bigger but start small. ru: 2 koptein - And what to do if we have many companies at one server(s)? just create o=MyCompany and o=AsteriskCompany and o=AnotherOneCompany? What is the difference with dc=MyCompany,dc=com and dc=AsteriskCompany,dc=com and dc=AnotherCompany,dc=com ? We need some strategy for DIT with many locations / contries / companies. 2 all - From Ubuntu survey - it seems that Ubuntu server are usually used by SOHO, and they do not use Ubuntu as directory server because of lack DIT feature. For me it means that better to have DIT good for SOHO and suitable for big companies. From my point DIT in Ubuntu is most important feature in 9.04 release. ru: is there any work with this blueprint? if not - may be use eBox as official DIT for Ubuntu? or may be Canonical do not want to create any competitor to their proprietary Landscape. Is any ideas? -- Default LDAP DIT for user and group managment https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ldap-defaultdit-usergrp-mgmt -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 105457] Re: mysqd_safe high cpu usage
I can confirm the same problem. @foucault: I was running an amazon EC2 instance, AMI-ID: ami-7efd1a17 (http://alestic.com/), 32 bit, 8.04. And I also had 2 running mysqld_safe processes, one running wild, the other one as expected. (kinda easy to overlook the other process if you are just hunting down the culprit, as one usually sort by cpu usage :P) And I also think I tried to start the mysql server when it already was running, as described as part of the problem in the mysql bug tracker link you gave. Although I'm not able to reproduce it by trying to start mysql when already started.. -- mysqd_safe high cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332112] [NEW] segfault at 7fff87f53ff8 rip 7f787f74d5fa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid I'm using hardy: Linux sbg-server 2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 01:04:16 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux From four days to now squid segfaults more or less at the same time: Feb 17 07:05:19 sbg-server kernel: [64543.606563] squid[5747]: segfault at 7fff23d76ff8 rip 7f7f1b570696 rsp 7fff23d77000 error 6 Feb 18 06:44:32 sbg-server kernel: [41918.994602] squid[7085]: segfault at 7fff883a5ff8 rip 7fb77fb736b3 rsp 7fff883a6000 error 6 Feb 19 06:50:42 sbg-server kernel: [128634.416857] squid[10102]: segfault at 7fff87f53ff8 rip 7f787f74d5fa rsp 7fff87f54000 error 6 Feb 20 06:51:58 sbg-server kernel: [215056.839383] squid[10339]: segfault at 70241fc8 rip 7fb8e7a0f6b3 rsp 70241fd0 error 6 I haven't make any changes in conf in last years. If you need more info tell me how i can obtain it ... Thanks. ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfault at 7fff87f53ff8 rip 7f787f74d5fa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 330626] Re: 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update
Marking triagged. Commenting out the printing sections may be a workaround in some setup. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High Status: Confirmed = Triaged Target: None = jaunty-alpha-6 -- 9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 fails to start on update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330626 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302786] Re: PHP5 Realpath function
I can confirm this bug in the Hardy php5 version (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.5) In Intrepid and Jaunty realpath() seems to behave properly. If it matters; I used php5-cli for the testing. ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- PHP5 Realpath function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 332112] [NEW] segfault at 7fff87f53ff8 rip 7f787f74d5fa
Hi, On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:52:23PM -, marc wrote: From four days to now squid segfaults more or less at the same time: Feb 17 07:05:19 sbg-server kernel: [64543.606563] squid[5747]: segfault at 7fff23d76ff8 rip 7f7f1b570696 rsp 7fff23d77000 error 6 Feb 18 06:44:32 sbg-server kernel: [41918.994602] squid[7085]: segfault at 7fff883a5ff8 rip 7fb77fb736b3 rsp 7fff883a6000 error 6 Feb 19 06:50:42 sbg-server kernel: [128634.416857] squid[10102]: segfault at 7fff87f53ff8 rip 7f787f74d5fa rsp 7fff87f54000 error 6 Feb 20 06:51:58 sbg-server kernel: [215056.839383] squid[10339]: segfault at 70241fc8 rip 7fb8e7a0f6b3 rsp 70241fd0 error 6 I haven't make any changes in conf in last years. If you need more info tell me how i can obtain it ... Could you check if the segfault happens around the same time as a daily cron job? status incomplete -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- segfault at 7fff87f53ff8 rip 7f787f74d5fa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332087] Re: Disabling the default virtual host disables options on the root directory ('/').
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: apache2-common
Problem:
- Disabling the default virtual host enables 'AllowOverride Any' for the root
('/') directory and disables 'FollowSymlinks'.
+ Disabling the default virtual host enables 'AllowOverride All' for the root
('/') directory and disables 'FollowSymlinks'.
This effects (at least) Hardy and Intrepid's versions of Apache2.
Overview:
The default Apache virtual host (/etc/apache2/sites-available/default)
has a 'Directory' option for the root directory (see below). By
disabling the default virtual host these directives and the protections
they offer are removed.
Directory /
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
/Directory
Applying options to the root directory should probably not be delegated to
this virtual host, even if the assumption is that the virtual host will not be
disabled.
Moving this section to /etc/apache2/apache2.conf file will not alter the
default configuration of the web server and will still protect the root
directory even if the default virtual host is removed.
Solution:
Move the 'Directory' directive for the root directory from the default
virtual host file to the apache2.conf file (probably above the
'AccessFileName' directives).
--
Disabling the default virtual host disables options on the root directory ('/').
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332087
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 292791] Re: silent login/gdm failures and sudo segfaults with smbpasswd enabled
Hey All, Has there been any resolution to this. I had the same problems mentioned in the initial post, changed my 2 pam files, and was able to log back in. However, now my samba server doesn't start and cups still doesn't work properly. I had just installed a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 server 2 days ago when this happened, so it seems this is some kind of bug, no? Is there a way to get samba and cups working well together? Thanks, Todd -- silent login/gdm failures and sudo segfaults with smbpasswd enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332198] [NEW] ssh-askpass-gnome fails to grab keyboard with gnome keyring open
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ssh-askpass-gnome ssh-askpass-gnome fails with message that it could not grab the keyboard. Steps to reproduce: Install ssh-askpass-gnome and mail-notification add both ssh-askpass and mail-notification to the list of startup programs. When mail-notification starts, it uses the gnome keyring to authenticate using a popup dialog that grabs focus. When ssh-askpass starts second, it attempts to also grab focus, and fails since the keyring already has it. I then have to manually run ssh-askpass after signing into the gnome keyring for it to work. It would be great if these programs could play nice and wait for the other one to complete (timeout sort of thing perhaps?) so that they both can succeed. ssh-askpass-gnome Version: 1:5.1p1-3ubuntu1 mail-notification Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-1build1b ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ssh-askpass-gnome fails to grab keyboard with gnome keyring open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 305264] Re: gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation
** Changed in: gnutls12 (Ubuntu Dapper) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: gnutls13 (Ubuntu Gutsy) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: gnutls13 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: gnutls26 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: gnutls26 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Importance: Undecided = High -- gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 305264] Re: gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation
Upstream released 2.4.3 to address both the vulnerability and the known regressions. Reviewing upstream's mailing list shows no regressions so far with this version. I've sync'd Jaunty with 2.4.2-6, which brings its patches in line with upstream 2.4.3, so I am marking Jaunty as 'Fix Released'. I have backported the relevant patches to Dapper through Intrepid, and am testing them now. I will upload them shortly for testing. ** Changed in: gnutls26 (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332254] [NEW] package samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: underproces post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Deleted /etc/samba ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: underproces post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: underproces post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-8-generic x86_64 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- package samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: underproces post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332254 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332254] Re: package samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: underproces post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22921893/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22921894/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: underproces post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332254 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 305264] Re: gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation
Thanks. Jamie Strandboge wrote: Upstream released 2.4.3 to address both the vulnerability and the known regressions. Reviewing upstream's mailing list shows no regressions so far with this version. I've sync'd Jaunty with 2.4.2-6, which brings its patches in line with upstream 2.4.3, so I am marking Jaunty as 'Fix Released'. I have backported the relevant patches to Dapper through Intrepid, and am testing them now. I will upload them shortly for testing. ** Changed in: gnutls26 (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- Douglas E. Engert deeng...@anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 (630) 252-5444 -- gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 205921] Re: openvpn crashed with signal 25 in __kernel_vsyscall()
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, processing it in order to get sufficient information for the developers failed (it does not generate an useful symbolic stack trace). This might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system at the time of the report. Please upgrade your system to the latest package versions. If you still encounter the crash, please file a new report. Thank you for your understanding, and sorry for the inconvenience! ** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- openvpn crashed with signal 25 in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 305264] Re: gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation
Dapper - Intrepid have been uploaded to the ubuntu-security-proposed ppa (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa). Once they have finished building, they can be pocket copied to -proposed and people can use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed. Please leave feedback here so they can be moved to -updates. ** Changed in: gnutls12 (Ubuntu Dapper) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: gnutls13 (Ubuntu Gutsy) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: gnutls13 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: gnutls26 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- gnutls regression: failure in certificate chain validation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 68108] Re: saslauthd forces directory permissions that prevent postfix access
John,
I did some reading and found a lead that may solve the problem. If not,
we will need to provide steps to reproduce the problem in order to
complete the bug report so it can move forward to development.
Postfix runs in chroot, so 'var/run/saslauthd must be under
/var/spool/postfix. The error message hinted that saslauthd directory is
not in the postfix chroot jail.
I have installed an 8.10 server in a VirtualBox and followed the Ubuntu
Server Guide at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix. Some key
points here:
We have to change a few things to make it work properly. Because Postfix runs
chrooted in /var/spool/postfix we have change a couple paths to live in the
false root. (ie. /var/run/saslauthd becomes
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd):
In /etc/default/saslauthd:
PWDIR=/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd
PARAMS=-m ${PWDIR}
PIDFILE=${PWDIR}/saslauthd.pid
#make sure you set the options here otherwise it ignores params above and will
not work
OPTIONS=-c -m /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd
Next, we update the dpkg state of /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd. The
saslauthd init script uses this setting to create the missing directory with
the appropriate permissions and ownership:
dpkg-statoverride --force --update --add root sasl 755
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd
sudo /etc/init.d/saslauthd start
==
I first found this guide
https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html which only
documents the Dovecot SASL implementation and not the Cyrus one. That
would leave the Cyrus SASL unconfigured.
I was able to start saslauthd with no error messages. I have no
experience with mail serrver, so this may not mean much. My role is to
attempt to reproduce the problem so the (completed) bug report can be
moved to Confirm and forwarded to development.
If reviewing the configuration does not solve the problem, could you
provide all relevant information so I can make a reasonable attempt to
reproduce and move forward as development will need that info.
BugSquad.
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
saslauthd forces directory permissions that prevent postfix access
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68108
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332338] [NEW] package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I had manually installed samba and SWAT (well, via apt) and then uninstalled them after what I was trying to get to work didn't work. Then I basically tried to re-install samba by creating a folder and attempting to share it, which triggers Ubuntu to install samba. It was at this point that the install failed. So, maybe something in my uninstall process messed things up... I'm using 8.10, Intrepid. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 332338] Re: package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22928732/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22928733/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 200661] Re: php5 missing symbol prevent apache2 to start
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We are closing this bug because it lacks the information needed to investigate the problem. If this you are still experiencing this bug with the latest release of Ubuntu please feel free to reopen this bug report. You can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change the Status back to New. Thanks again and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Tags added: gbj-oklahoma-0902 -- php5 missing symbol prevent apache2 to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 209520] Re: SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share
This bug is marked as resolved in Ubuntu 8.04; are you sure this is the bug you're seeing? You don't give any details about the problem you're having. -- SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 75028] Re: ospfd starts way too late in the boot process
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance. ** Tags added: gbj-oklahoma-0902 -- ospfd starts way too late in the boot process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to quagga in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 248310] Re: package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance. ** Tags added: gbj-oklahoma-0902 -- package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 319553] Re: No Wired Internet Connection in 8.10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 274069 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274069 @Crown, i hope is not too late https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcp3/+bug/274069/comments/4 -- No Wired Internet Connection in 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu (via bug 274069). -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 173632] Re: debconf - Can not use dc domain style
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance. ** Tags added: gbj-oklahoma-0902 -- debconf - Can not use dc domain style https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 75028] Re: ospfd starts way too late in the boot process
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 02:51 +, duanedesign wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. No, there hasn't. Unless I am mistaken, it seems the ball is in your court though, not mine. So why hasn't anything been done with it lately? I filed this bug over two years ago and not a thing has happened with it since I filed it. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. It sure is -- given that nothing's been done about it. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? I am already running the latest release (Intrepid). Find attached the latest bootchart. Notice how long into the boot it is before ospfd starts and how many network services have been started before it. ** Attachment added: intrepid-20090220-2.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22933295/intrepid-20090220-2.png -- ospfd starts way too late in the boot process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to quagga in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 329173] [NEW] Impossible to rename file to other case on samba mounted volume
You have been subscribed to a public bug: If I have a file test I can't rename it to TEST. I get an error that there already is a file with that name. But the file system on the remote disk (ext3) is case sensitive so the rename would work. I have the disk mounted using samba. I'm pretty sure this worked before and some update has caused this annoyance. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Impossible to rename file to other case on samba mounted volume https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/329173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 329173] Re: Impossible to rename file to other case on samba mounted volume
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in samba. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = samba -- Impossible to rename file to other case on samba mounted volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 12296] Re: PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker
Oh I forgot to mention, the problem is if a package requires libapache2 -mod-php5, it forces the mpmpork version of Apache. As long as a php package use the php5 metapackage instead of requiring libapache2-mod- php5 directly, mpmworker can be installed. -- PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 12296] Re: PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker
My opinion is that novices should use mpm_prefork. No offense but that's a very Debian-esque answer. Sure most of us can get PHP5 + FCGI to work, but the problem is a lot of ubuntu/debian php webapp pacakges (e.g. phpmyadmin, etc.) use the mod_php5 package in their dependencies rather than the php5 metapackage, and put php directives in their httdp.conf/.htaccess with no IfModule lines. You may be right that another package is not needed. As the php5-cgi + ibapache2-mod-fcgid packages are sufficient. What we need is a clear policy that php webapp packages should depends on the php5 metapackage rather than lipapache2-mod-php5. -- PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
