[Bug 291629] Re: kipmi0 uses 100% cpu
Just to let you know this is not unique to ubuntu or debian. I see what appears to be the same one in Suse 10.1 (kernel 2.6.16.54-0.2.5-smp). It is running on a SunFire server with 2x AMD Opteron 848 CPUs. This is a no longer maintained kernel, it may of course have been fixed in newer kernel versions. -- kipmi0 uses 100% cpu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484698] [NEW] ntp package should not install a drift file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp The drift file (in Ubuntu its default location is /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift) contains ntpd's estimate of the system's drift relative to UTC, expressed in ppm. This file is generated by ntpd, and its purpose is to speed up convergence following restart. Ubuntu's ntp package installs a drift file containing 0.000, i.e. a zero drift. The effect is that when ntpd is first started following installation of the ntp package, it will assume that zero ppm is a good estimate of the drift of the system clock. This is not correct. If no reliable estimate of the drift is known (as is the case when ntp is first installed), the drift file should simply be absent, so that ntpd knows that characterisation of the system's drift has not yet happened. The current approach causes ntpd's startup behaviour to be significantly worse than it needs to be. Please therefore simply refrain from installing a drift file. If one already exists I recommend that the ntp installer should leave it alone, except perhaps for making sure that it has the correct permissions and ownership. ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ntp package should not install a drift file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484734] [NEW] User names searches are case insensitive; group membership lookups case sensitive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libnss-ldap We are using LDAP as a user database. Users log in using GDM on workstations running Ubuntu 9.04. We've standardized on lowercase usernames. The problem is that when a user logs in using a login name that differs only in case (eg. Roel, roeL), logging in works, however the group memberships are not applied. This can be seen by running the id command: $ id roel uid=1004(roel) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users),1000(General) $ id Roel uid=1004(roel) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users) Note the missing General group. This causes problems with accessing shared directories that are only accessible by certain groups. We've instructed the users to use lowercase letters, but IMHO login names should always be case sensitive. Perhaps unrelated, it seems that the bug is fixed in the libnss-ldapd fork in Karmic: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/n /nss-ldapd/nss-ldapd_0.6.11ubuntu2/changelog Ubuntu version: Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 libnss-ldap: Installed: 261-2.1ubuntu1 Candidate: 261-2.1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 261-2.1ubuntu1 0 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- User names searches are case insensitive; group membership lookups case sensitive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 238684] Re: [patch?] alt-gr does not work inside kvm debian terminal
I'm not sure this is purely virt-manager problem, as it seems to happen also when using libvirt's virsh. So may need to be reassigned to libvirt actually. -- [patch?] alt-gr does not work inside kvm debian terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 462000] Re: apparmor disallows qemu+tcp:// connections
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- apparmor disallows qemu+tcp:// connections https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484807] [NEW] module blacklisting not respected
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm ad 1) ubuntu 9.10 ad 2) qemu-kvm 0.11.0-0ubuntu6.3 ad 3) The script /etc/init.d/qemu-kvm should respect the blacklisting system of modprobe (/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-xxx.conf for example). ad 4) The kvm modules are loaded even if blacklisted. If you are interested why the issue arises: The kvm modules conflict with virualbox and I dont want to modify the init scripts by hand especally because there is infrastructure to handle this in another way. Patch attached. ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- module blacklisting not respected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484807] Re: module blacklisting not respected
** Attachment added: Use --use-blacklist paramter when loading the kvm modules http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35825330/qemu-kvm.oebatch01 -- module blacklisting not respected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 329067] Re: Cannot change password on ldap client unless libpam-cracklib also installed
I'd like to confirm this bug too with libpam-ldap 184-4.2ubuntu2 on Jaunty. I had the following configuration generated by pam-auth-update: password [success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so obscure sha512 password [success=1 user_unknown=ignore default=die] pam_ldap.so use_authtok try_first_pass password requisite pam_deny.so password required pam_permit.so I believe that pam_unix doesn't recognise the account as it's stored in ldap - it has no shadow entry, so doesn't prompt for an authtok (ie new password), then pam_ldap fails because it's trying to use the authtok which has not been set: Enter login(LDAP) password: passwd: Authentication information cannot be recovered passwd: password unchanged Removing the use_authtok therefore also fixes it for me, and also explains why pam_cracklib hides the problem - its higher in the stack and sets the authtok after checking it for strength. Ultimately I guess try_authtok would be the right semantic to work in both situations. -- Cannot change password on ldap client unless libpam-cracklib also installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329067 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libpam-ldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 484807] Re: module blacklisting not respected
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:59:35PM -, oger000 wrote: ** Attachment added: Use --use-blacklist paramter when loading the kvm modules http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35825330/qemu-kvm.oebatch01 I think it will seem confusing that the init script says Loading kvm module [OK], yet the module isn't loaded. I don't know if modprobe offers a way to check whether a module /would/ be loaded by modprobe -b. If it does, we can check earlier and simply not echo anything at all. -- module blacklisting not respected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 484807] [NEW] module blacklisting not respected
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:59:35PM -, oger000 wrote: ad 1) ubuntu 9.10 ad 2) qemu-kvm 0.11.0-0ubuntu6.3 ad 3) The script /etc/init.d/qemu-kvm should respect the blacklisting system of modprobe (/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-xxx.conf for example). ad 4) The kvm modules are loaded even if blacklisted. If you are interested why the issue arises: The kvm modules conflict with virualbox and I dont want to modify the init scripts by hand especally because there is infrastructure to handle this in another way. I presume you need this because you're using qemu-kvm to emulate other architectures? Otherwise, why not just remove qemu-kvm instead of fiddling with blacklists? -- module blacklisting not respected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 480125] Re: karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes
(also, my system comes up in much the same state as if I hadn't done the reinstall in my late_command script) -- karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484426] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
You should just be able to sudo touch /etc/init.d/mysql and then purge it Regards chuck ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 482589] Re: [karmic] package mysql-server-5.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: freeze at 'unpacking' part
Hi, I was wondering if you were still having problems? Thanks chuck ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- [karmic] package mysql-server-5.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: freeze at 'unpacking' part https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484051] Re: package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This isnt a samba bug. Thanks chuck ** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = ubuntu -- package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 483907] Re: package samba-common-bin 2:3. 4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado
This doesnt look like a samba bug to me. Relevant error: dpkg: aviso: Arquivos da lista de arquivos para o pacote `xserver-xorg- input-vmmouse' faltando, assumindo que o pacote não possui arquivos atualmente instalados. dpkg: aviso: Arquivos da lista de arquivos para o pacote `tcpd' faltando, assumindo que o pacote não possui arquivos atualmente instalados. dpkg: aviso: Arquivos da lista de arquivos para o pacote `xserver- common' faltando, assumindo que o pacote não possui arquivos atualmente instalados. dpkg: aviso: Arquivos da lista de arquivos para o pacote `ure' faltando, assumindo que o pacote não possui arquivos atualmente instalados. dpkg: aviso: Arquivos da lista de arquivos para o pacote `xfonts-mathml' faltando, assumindo que o pacote não possui arquivos atualmente instalados. ** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = dpkg (Ubuntu) -- package samba-common-bin 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cups (Ubuntu) -- Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 480125] Re: karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes
On a whim, I decided to query debconf with debconf-show eucalyptus-cc before and after the purge/reinstall: Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: eucalyptus/mode: MANAGED-NOVLAN Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: * eucalyptus/publicips: Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: eucalyptus/dns: 172.24.1.1 Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: * eucalyptus/cluster-name: Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: eucalyptus/netmask: 255.255.0.0 Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: eucalyptus/addrspernet: 32 Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: eucalyptus/subnet: 172.19.0.0 and after the purge/reinstall: Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/mode: MANAGED-NOVLAN Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/publicips: Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/dns: 172.24.1.1 Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/cluster-name: Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/netmask: 255.255.0.0 Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/addrspernet: 32 Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/subnet: 172.19.0.0 So what happened to my preseeded info? # grep publicips /var/log/installer/syslog Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: -- SET eucalyptus/publicips 172.24.56.0-172.24.63.255 Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: -- 10 eucalyptus/publicips doesn't exist Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: -- REGISTER debian-installer/dummy eucalyptus/publicips Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: -- SET eucalyptus/publicips 172.24.56.0-172.24.63.255 Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: -- SUBST eucalyptus/publicips ID eucalyptus/publicips Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: Adding [ID] - [eucalyptus/publicips] Nov 18 16:57:58 debconf: -- FSET eucalyptus/publicips seen true Nov 18 17:00:27 debconf-copydb: Adding [ID] - [eucalyptus/publicips] Nov 18 17:00:28 debconf-copydb: Adding [ID] - [eucalyptus/publicips] Nov 18 17:04:03 in-target: * eucalyptus/publicips: Nov 18 17:04:08 in-target: eucalyptus/publicips: -- karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 482086] Re: System time is very slow and differs with real for about 1 minute per hour
Mathias, please take a look at my today's time1.log, it seems that sometimes after ntpd gets synchronized, system time went successfully till system reboot. ** Attachment added: time1.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35829320/time1.log -- System time is very slow and differs with real for about 1 minute per hour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 480125] Re: karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes
Once I narrowed it down to debconf, Colin Watson immediately clued me to the fact that I most likely had the wrong owner for my eucalyptus-cc settings. In fact, I had just cutwasted the d-i from the eucalyptus- udeb settings and not even thought twice about it. Changing the owner to eucalyptus-cc fixed the problem and the configuration files are as they should be. I'm still testing the full installation, though. -- karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 484426] [NEW] package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:41:43PM -, Nancy Poekert wrote: Public bug reported: This failed to update because I stupidly deleted the folder /etc/init.d/mysql. Now apt-get remove, purge and install all fail because the files are not there. I wanted to purge mysql-server and reinstall it from scratch. Now I really can't do anything because I don't have the files that I deleted. Could you try to create /etc/init.d/mysql and then purge? status incomplete importance low -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484944] Re: package bacula-director-mysql 2 .4.4-1ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozes s installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwer t 1 zurück
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35830785/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35830786/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35830787/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35830788/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package bacula-director-mysql 2.4.4-1ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 480125] Re: karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes
It works, so you can resolve/reject this bug as user error. -- karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
Is there a reason why NFS can't be set to use fixed ports by default? I don't see a security issue because rpcinfo gives you the ports anyway, so if you can connect to RPC you can find the ports; obviously you'd need to ensure that they didn't conflict with anything else, but hopefully that's easier than for thousands of users to have to figure out which files to change in order to get it to use fixed ports which can be firewalled reliably. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 484807] [NEW] module blacklisting not respected
I have both virtualbox-ose and qemu-kvm installed on my Karmic system. When I want to run virtualbox, I first run: $ sudo service qemu-kvm stop which unloads the kvm module, and then I can run virtualbox. -- module blacklisting not respected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 480125] Re: karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes
Cool, thanks for the followup, Nick! ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- karmic netboot UEC install fails at registering nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485026] [NEW] [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable
Public bug reported: slapd-2.4.18-0ubuntu1 Steps to reproduce: 1. apt-get install slapd 2. ldapmodify -H ldapi:/// -Y EXTERNAL base.ldif (file attached to this ticket) 3. the ldapmodify hangs and slapd consumes all available cpu 4. slapd can now only be killed with the -9 signal I tried to cut down the base.ldif as much as possible. I had a much bigger ldif file before. I suspect a race or an ordering issue, because removing any one of the overlays makes the ldapmodify work. ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485026] Re: [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable
** Attachment added: base.ldif http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35834912/base.ldif -- [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485026] Re: [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable
Interesting, looks like ordering is an issue.
In this order, slapd hangs:
adding new entry olcOverlay=refint,olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config
adding new entry olcOverlay=syncprov,olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config
adding new entry o=example,c=us HANGS
In this other order, it works:
adding new entry olcOverlay=syncprov,olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config
adding new entry olcOverlay=refint,olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config
adding new entry o=example,c=us
Note: when testing again, you need to clear the database and the config, or
just purge slapd and reinstall. Running that ldapmodify command twice in a row
won't work.
--
[karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485026
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 394583] Re: package mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi Mathias , Resolving the bind Address in /etc/mysql/my.cnf solved the problem Thanks Regards, Ajit On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Marchello minber...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same problem. What should I do with files Dependencies.txt and DpkgTerminalLog.gz after I download it? -- package mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394583 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “mysql-dfsg-5.0” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Yesterday , I installed mysql server 5.0 on Jaunty It was working fine , but when today restarted the system , It is saying as Fail to restart Below are error details a...@ajitw:/var/www$ sudo apt-get install mysql-server-5.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: tinyca mailx The following NEW packages will be installed: mysql-server-5.0 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 143 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/23.6MB of archives. After this operation, 79.4MB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package mysql-server-5.0. (Reading database ... 111774 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking mysql-server-5.0 (from .../mysql-server-5.0_5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up mysql-server-5.0 (5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2) ... * Stopping MySQL database server mysqld [ OK ] * Reloading AppArmor profiles ... [ OK ] * Starting MySQL database server mysqld [fail] invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action start failed. dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.0 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: mysql-server-5.0 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) a...@ajitw:/var/www$ Please Help Me it is urgent ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 SourcePackage: mysql-dfsg-5.0 Title: package mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 -- package mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394583 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484426] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Thanks Mathias and Chuck for your suggestions. I was able to solve the problem by purging mysql-common. Then I was able to install mysql-server. -- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 383636] Re: DDNS updates aren't automated
Hello again, I've just installed Ubuntu 9.10 using the likewise-open5 package and the same problem occurs. Was this fixed in 9.04 and not 9.10? ... Should I be using a different package? Regards, Oliver -- DDNS updates aren't automated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383636 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485065] [NEW] python-vm-builder description doesn't include karmic in supported distros
Public bug reported: This is a very low importance bug... python-vm-builder (version 0.11.3-0ubuntu1) description reads The currently supported distros are: - * Ubuntu Dapper, Gutsy, Hardy, Intrepid, and Jaunty. but Karmic is currently supported (VMBuilder/plugins/ubuntu/karmic.py exists and VMBuilder/plugins/ubuntu/distro.py contains 'karmic' in suites) ** Affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: packaging -- python-vm-builder description doesn't include karmic in supported distros https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485065] Re: python-vm-builder description doesn't include karmic in supported distros
** Attachment added: add_karmic_in_description.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35836764/add_karmic_in_description.patch -- python-vm-builder description doesn't include karmic in supported distros https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484426] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Great, glad to hear it. Regards chuck ** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.37-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485026] Re: [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable
I just built a 2.4.19 package for karmic and it exhibits the same problem. -- [karmic] slapd hangs at 100% cpu and is unkillable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 484807] [NEW] module blacklisting not respected
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:34:27PM -, Dustin Kirkland wrote: I have both virtualbox-ose and qemu-kvm installed on my Karmic system. When I want to run virtualbox, I first run: $ sudo service qemu-kvm stop which unloads the kvm module, and then I can run virtualbox. What happens if the kvm module is loaded when you run VirtualBox? -- module blacklisting not respected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485106] [NEW] euca2ools should read config and credentials from config file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: euca2ools euca2ools currently reads its configuration from 1 of 2 places: a.) environment variables b.) command line arguments the configuration above that is read includes: EC2_URL EC2_ACCESS_KEY EC2_SECRET_KEY EC2_CERT EC2_PRIVATE_KEY S3_URL EUCALYPTUS_CERT In addition to being a non-typical way of specifying configuration, the environment variables EC2_ACCESS_KEY and EC2_PRIVATE_KEY contain sensitive information. It is generally considered less than secure to set sensitive information in the environment. Instead or in addition to (really only for backwards compat) euca2ools should read configuration from a config file. I suggest: /etc/euca2ools/eucarc $HOME/.eucarc And additionally allow the caller to specify a config file. Ie: euca-run-instances --config /tmp/my-config eki-abcdefg ** Affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca2ools should read config and credentials from config file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485113] [NEW] euca2ools should include --region support
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: euca2ools none of the euca2ools commands support '--region' flag. This is less relevant to eucalyptus than it is to ec2, and arguably not at all relevant to eucalyptus. That said, most ec2-* commands take '--region', which essentially sets the EC2_URL flag accordingly. For example: ec2-describe-instances no-flag uses ec2.amazonaws.com ec2-describe-instaces --region us-east-1 uses us-east-1.ec2.amazonaws.com passing --region is more convienent than having to change EC2_URL for each. ** Affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca2ools should include --region support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485113] Re: euca2ools should include --region support
none of the euca2ools commands support '--region' flag. euca-describe-availability-zones supports the --region flag. Sure, this can be added to other commands. It cannot be used in a consistent way with Eucalyptus and Amazon, however, since --region only supplies part of the EC2_URL. The rest is implicitly assumed to be ec2.amazonaws.com Sure, we could make hack-ish assumptions (for instance, if the region contains /services/Eucalyptus, use the entire URL, if not, append ec2.amazonaws.com). -- euca2ools should include --region support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 262251] Re: phpize: configure:8184: error: possibly undefined macro: _LT_SET_OPTIONS
PHP 5.2.11-1ubuntu1 still not working, been more then a year. Will a fix every be out? -- phpize: configure:8184: error: possibly undefined macro: _LT_SET_OPTIONS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485172] [NEW] Fresh Ubuntu 9.10 install - Backuppc package failed to install, Running 3Ware Raids
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: backuppc Brand new first-time install of Ubuntu 9.10. Dual boot system with Win 7. 3Ware 8506-8 card installed, one 4-disk RAID 10 and one 2-disk RAID 0. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Nov 18 17:38:48 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) Package: backuppc 3.1.0-6ubuntu4 PackageArchitecture: all ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: backuppc Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-6ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64 ** Affects: backuppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- Fresh Ubuntu 9.10 install - Backuppc package failed to install, Running 3Ware Raids https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 485172] Re: Fresh Ubuntu 9.10 install - Backuppc package failed to install, Running 3Ware Raids
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35844359/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35844363/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35844364/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35844365/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- Fresh Ubuntu 9.10 install - Backuppc package failed to install, Running 3Ware Raids https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328550] Re: qla2xxx takes ~one minute to initialize per device
I'm reopening this bug. This is not a wishlist at all; it's a
significant regression for users of this hardware, that will affect both
new installs and LTS-LTS upgrades. While I agree that doubling the
size of all initramfses unreasonably penalizes users without this
hardware, we do need to have a solution that works out of the box for
users /with/ this hardware - if always including this firmware in the
initramfs isn't reasonable, then we should entertain other options, such
as using a different policy for server kernels or opportunistically
adding the firmware to the initramfs *if* it's detected that the module
is needed on the hardware where the initramfs is built (or if it's
detected that the root device uses it).
Now, in the udev in Ubuntu 9.10, I see that /usr/share/initramfs-
tools/hooks/udev *does* include the following code:
for rules in 50-udev-default.rules 50-firmware.rules
60-persistent-storage.rules 61-persistent-storage-edd.rules
64-device-mapper.rules 80-drivers.rules 95-udev-late.rules; do
cp -p /lib/udev/rules.d/$rules ${DESTDIR}/lib/udev/rules.d
done
[...]
copy_exec /lib/udev/firmware.sh /lib/udev
So I don't believe udev in 9.10 is actually buggy - the firmware loading
hooks are present in the initramfs!
It looks like only initramfs-tools itself has a bug, because only
firmware for modules that are explicitly singled out in /usr/share
/initramfs-tools/hook-functions are included in the initramfs. There,
firmware is *only* copied if it's found in the /lib/modules/$(uname -r)
directory - not if it's found in /lib/firmware. This is inconsistent,
and appears to be a straightforward bug due to an oversight rather than
a design decision.
Correcting this pulls in only 6 more firmware files, adds 684k
(unpacked; 315k packed) to the initramfs size, and the change is also
included already in the newer version of the update-initramfs package
upstream in Debian. So I think this is the obviously correct change to
make here.
** Package changed: udev (Ubuntu) = initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = High
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix = In Progress
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
qla2xxx takes ~one minute to initialize per device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 455873] Re: mod proxy causes duplicate query strings when nocanon option is used
This has been superseded by 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.14. -- mod proxy causes duplicate query strings when nocanon option is used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455873 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328550] Re: qla2xxx takes ~one minute to initialize per device
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Assignee: Steve Langasek (vorlon) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: regression-release -- qla2xxx takes ~one minute to initialize per device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 328550] Re: qla2xxx takes ~one minute to initialize per device
This bug was fixed in the package initramfs-tools - 0.92bubuntu54 --- initramfs-tools (0.92bubuntu54) lucid; urgency=low * hook-functions: check both /lib/firmware/$(uname -r) and /lib/firmware for the firmware that we wish to copy; in any cases where we want to suppress a firmware-using module from the initramfs, we should do that explicitly and not by accidentally failing to include the firmware. LP: #328550. * hook-functions: cherry pick fix from Debian upstream version to not warn about missing firmware for modules whose names are merely /like/ those of modules listed in /proc/modules. -- Steve Langasek steve.langa...@ubuntu.com Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:47:55 -0600 ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- qla2xxx takes ~one minute to initialize per device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
