[Bug 584048] Re: kvm images losing connectivity w/bridged network

2010-07-18 Thread Jürgen Sauer
This morning I had an freeze also.
The virtualized Hardy was freezed. (Host is Lucid-AMD64 on Xenons)
The virtualized Lucid was running fine. (on same Host)
The virtualized Dapper was running fine also (same Host).

The Hardy is on-production Server Ouch! Ouch! Ouch!

"I hate mondays"

-- 
kvm images losing connectivity w/bridged network
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584048
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 573436] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0

2010-07-18 Thread Ogilvierothchild
The following worked for me:

cd /etc/php5/cli/conf.d
sudo perl -pi.bk -e 's/(\s*)#/\1;/' *ini
sudo mkdir bk
sudo mv *.bk bk

Which only catches comments at the start of a line; also, backups of the
original files are in the /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/bk directory.

-- 
PHP Deprecated:  Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in 
/etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573436
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 607039] Re: NFS automount failover doesn't work

2010-07-18 Thread stephane

** Attachment added: "/etc/autofs.d/auto.vcs that the auto.master file refers 
to"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52140619/auto.vcs

-- 
NFS automount failover doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 607039] Re: NFS automount failover doesn't work

2010-07-18 Thread stephane

** Attachment added: "auto.master file"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52140589/auto.master

-- 
NFS automount failover doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 607039] Re: NFS automount failover doesn't work

2010-07-18 Thread stephane

** Attachment added: "strace output"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52140531/strace-autofs-and-kids.txt

-- 
NFS automount failover doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 607039] [NEW] NFS automount failover doesn't work

2010-07-18 Thread stephane
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: autofs5

In lucid, using autofs5 version 5.0.4-3.1ubuntu5, we are having trouble
using failover with NFS.  Autofs allows you to specify multiple hosts
with weighting in its configuration files and will fall back to a
secondary host if the first host is not available at mount time.
However, currently on our systems, the mount fails completely.  This
functionality does work with our RHEL 5 hosts (which use autofs 5.0.1).
Automounting from a single host does work, but when we supply multiple
hosts, an strace shows that it's trying to connect to the IP address
'0.0.0.0', port 0, rather than any of the hosts we specify.

I have attached the full strace output, our /etc/auto.master file, and
the relevant file from /etc/autofs.d including the multiple hosts.

** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
NFS automount failover doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 573919] Re: autofs doesn't work with lucid

2010-07-18 Thread Carl Nobile
If you look in /etc/init/portmap.conf you will see that its prerequisite
for starting is statd which is done in /etc/init/portmap.conf. However,
there are numerous errors in my /var/log/boot.log file.

I upgraded two machines and both have the same issue as mentioned above.
A new install I did does not have this issue, so it obviously is some
config issues that is going badly when upgrading.

I was originally fixing this issue by stopping then starting portmap
again. (A restart didn't work.)

I have found this in my /var/log/boot.log file:

init: statd main process (730) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (736) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (747) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (754) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: rpc_pipefs pre-start process (703) terminated with status 32
init: statd main process (764) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (770) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (776) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (782) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (788) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (794) terminated with status 1
init: statd main process ended, respawning
init: statd main process (800) terminated with status 1
init: statd respawning too fast, stopped

-- 
autofs doesn't work with lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 604802] Re: Merge commons-io 1.4-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-07-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
Please note in the bug when you've forwarded a patch to Debian. It makes
sponsors start the review happy :)

Err, I'm not a main sponsor, but I think this can be synced, given that
Debian has changed their java policy here and reject the ubuntu
dependancy changes..

-- 
Merge commons-io 1.4-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604802
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to commons-io in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 606953] [NEW] debian /etc/init.d/eucalyptus-cloud needs help

2010-07-18 Thread Steffen Möller
Public bug reported:

JAVA_HOME was set to "/usr", just because 
$ ls -l /usr/bin/java
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 May 26 17:01 /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
and not directly to anything in
# ls -l /usr/lib/jvm
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   14 May 17 14:55 default-java -> java-6-openjdk
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   18 May 17 14:55 java-1.5.0-gcj -> java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Jul  8 22:23 java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   14 May 17 14:55 java-1.6.0-openjdk -> java-6-openjdk
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 May 26 15:55 java-6-openjdk
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   19 May 26 17:00 java-6-sun -> java-6-sun-1.6.0.20
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 May 26 17:00 java-6-sun-1.6.0.20
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   12 May 17 14:55 java-gcj -> java-gcj-4.4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   18 May 17 14:55 java-gcj-4.4 -> java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4

But independent from that observation, it should be noted that the
structure of the code is erroneous. The lower half of the following
patch improves the situation. For the upper half, a readlink to
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java, if existing, to seed JAVA_HOME would however
possibly be preferable.

This was spotted in the debian 1.6.2 packages but might also apply to
Ubuntu's.

Steffen

--- eucalyptus-cloud.orig   2010-07-16 16:18:48.0 +0200
+++ eucalyptus-cloud2010-07-16 16:43:55.0 +0200
@@ -189,17 +189,36 @@
 
# to be sure we are using the right java/JAVA_HOME
JAVA="$JAVA_HOME/jre/bin/java"
-
-   # let's see if we can find a decent java
-   if [ -x "$JAVA" ]; then
-   java_version=`$JAVA -version 2>&1 | grep "java version" | sed 
-e 's/.*java version "\(.*\)".*/\1/'`
-   if [ `expr $java_version "<" $java_min_version` -eq 0 ]; then
-   export JAVA_HOME
-   return 
+   for relpath in "jre/bin" bin; do
+   JAVA="$JAVA_HOME/$relpath/java"
+   if [ -x "$JAVA" ]; then
+   break;
fi
+   done
+
+   if [ "x$JAVA" == "x" ]; then
+   echo "Could not find Java executable underneath JAVA_HOME 
determined as $JAVA_HOME"
+   exit 1
+   fi
+
+   # version check
+
+   java_version=`$JAVA -version 2>&1 | grep "java version" | cut -f2 -d\"`
+   if [ -z "$java_version" ]; then
+   echo "Failed to determine Java version in init script."
+   exit 1
+   else
+   echo "Java version is '$java_version'"
+   fi
+   if [ `expr $java_version "<" $java_min_version` -eq 0 ]; then
+   export JAVA_HOME
+   return 
+   else
+   echo "Eucalyptus needs java version >= $java_min_version, found 
version \"$java_version\" of \"$JAVA\""
+   exit 1
fi
 
-   echo "Eucalyptus needs java version >= $java_min_version"
+   echo "Error in init.d/eucaluptus-cloud, this statement should not be 
reached."
exit 1
 }

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
debian /etc/init.d/eucalyptus-cloud needs help
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606953
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2010-07-18 Thread Spuerhund
Will the fix also be released for Lucid or only for future versions of
Ubuntu?

-- 
sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603363
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 606908] [NEW] euca-describe-availability-zones verbose returns EC2ResponseError: 403 Forbidden in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-07-18 Thread AliQ.
Public bug reported:

i've done this on Ubuntu 10.04:
$ .  ̃/.euca/eucarc
$ euca−describe−availability−zones verbose
but result was:
Warning: failed to parse error message from AWS: :1:0: syntax error
EC2ResponseError: 403 Forbidden
Failure: 403 Forbidden

my cloud controller has 2 network interfaces:
eth0: 192.168.1.30/24; dg: 192.168.1.254; dns:192.168.1.254
eth1: 192.168.20.1/24
and my cluster controller is set with: eth0: 192.168.20.2/24
///
i can't ping 192.168.20.1 or 192.168.20.2 from client, is it the reason of this 
issue? (cause i'm fallowing a guide on this)
and there's no "DEADLOCK" or "Resetting" on my "cloud-output.log" file.
i did an upgrade but problem still exist.

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
euca-describe-availability-zones verbose returns EC2ResponseError: 403 
Forbidden in Ubuntu 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606908
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 606898] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2010-07-18 Thread Tom V

** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52118868/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52118869/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52118870/Df.txt

** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52118871/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52118872/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 75
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 606898] [NEW] package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2010-07-18 Thread Tom V
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: postfix

ivtv drivers would not install.
ivtv-utils although the software center now reports it is installed.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: postfix 2.7.0-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jul 18 09:54:12 2010
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 75
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427.1)
SourcePackage: postfix
Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 75

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid

-- 
package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 75
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 606630] Re: package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-07-18 Thread C de-Avillez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 530832 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530832

for the record, this is the error:

Installing new version of config file /etc/vsftpd.conf ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/logrotate.d/vsftpd ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/pam.d/vsftpd ...
vsftpd user (ftp) already exists, doing nothing.
chown: invalid group: `root:ftp'
dpkg: error processing vsftpd (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

So it is, indeed, the same as bug 530832.

-- 
package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs