Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: autofs5-ldap
Configuration of slapd is directory based and ldapadd is not able to add
'.schema' files to LDAP configuration tree. To find out the way I can
add schema file into LDAP I wasted a lot of time for googleing. I think
it is not a very big
** Attachment added: The working autofs.ldif file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636195/+attachment/1573058/+files/autofs.ldif
--
Autofs for LDAP doesn't contain ldif file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636195
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
This is still a big issue on WiFi-enabled workstations. To put it into
perspective, we have upgraded from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS and shutdown
still takes around 40 minutes for the 16 cifs mounts in FSTAB on four
workstations. Users are seriously inconvenienced.
As hinted earlier, a workaround
Public bug reported:
So I was trying to document configuring a new OpenLDAP install in
Maverick but I ran into problems pretty quick. After I import my
backend.ldif file I am unable to import the front end because of the
error Invalid credentials (49).
Here is what I did. I can't see any
Hi,
did you try to do this:
sudo ldapadd -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f frontend.lan.local.ldif
Could be that you are missing some acls for cn=admin
--
After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363
You received this bug notification because
I haven't installed the ldap scripts package yet as acording to this document I
don't do it until much later
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/openldap-server.html
So without that ldapscripts package I can't use that command
--
After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials
hold on never mind
--
After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I forgot I removed openldap I will re-install and try that and let you
know.
--
After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap
@Stephan Hermann
When I run your command I get:
$ sudo ldapadd -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f frontend.lan.local.ldif
SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started
SASL username: gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth
SASL SSF: 0
adding new entry dc=lan,dc=local
ldap_add: Server is unwilling
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in invoke_cmd()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632934
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I wonder if this is the explanation to the not necessarily fixed bug
#403599?
--
install of libapache2-mod-php5 may not result in enabled php
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603192
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2
hmm...
I just followed the document and everything worked fine...
I wonder what's missing...
INvestigating
--
After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Are you using Ubuntu 10.10? I did a fresh install of the latest Ubuntu
10.10 x32 I can try again from the start and see what I get.
--
After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636573/+attachment/1575152/+files/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: Df.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636573/+attachment/1575153/+files/Df.txt
** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
It seems reasonable to not listen on IPv6 if no v6 address is
configured. Unfortunately, Apache (or rather APR) does this by using
getaddrinfo's AI_ADDRCONFIG flag. And glibc seems to ignore IPv6
addresses of scope host (i.e. ::1) when deciding if an v6 address is
configured. For me, the default
** Package changed: apache2 (Ubuntu) = eglibc (Ubuntu)
--
apache2 does not listen on ipv6 at all when there is no routable IPv6 address
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in
Thanks for checking, Gerben.
Maybe this is related to bug #633981: Can you please check in the output
of
ip a
before and after wireless is connected. Are there any inet6 addresses besides
the loop-back entry inet6 ::1/128 scope host?
Do you use network manager for connecting to the wireless?
Luka, that's correct. MSIE [17-9] matches MSIE 7 to 9 and 10 to 19
(and 1, but that should not be a problem).
--
typing error in default-ssl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626728
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in
The proposal is to get the packages apache2-suexec and libapache2-mod-
fcgid from universe into main? This combo works really well.
--
Not possible to run PHP in a multiuser and secure way
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312493
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
I do a normally system upgrade when it crash
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: eucalyptus-java-common 2.0~bzr1233-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-20-generic i686
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636687/+attachment/1575852/+files/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636687/+attachment/1575853/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Df.txt
Thanks for reporting this bug.. The logs suggest the upgrade happened
on the 5th September 2010... Is this the case?
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dave Walker (davewalker)
--
Server ISO 20100911 failed to install eucalyptus -- eucalyptus.udeb failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/maverick/eucalyptus/2.0
--
package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0~bzr1233-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
el subproceso script pre-installation nuevo devolvió el código de salida de
error 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636687
You received this bug
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Server ISO 20100911 failed to install eucalyptus -- eucalyptus.udeb failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Not fulling convinced this is a bug in eucalyptus, but certainly affects
it (investigating further).
My log:
Sep 13 00:37:17 main-menu[465]: DEBUG: resolver (libnewt0.52): package doesn't
exist (ignored)
Sep 13 00:37:17 main-menu[465]: DEBUG: resolver (libavahi-common3): package
doesn't exist
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
apt-get install bind9
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
bind9utils
Suggested packages:
bind9-doc resolvconf
The following NEW packages
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636738/+attachment/1576074/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Df.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636738/+attachment/1576075/+files/Df.txt
** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 610313 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610313
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 610313
package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can
I also had this issue. I saw a good number of questions but no answers
so I am linking to my resolution in the forum.
http://newyork.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9839614#post9839614
It may not be a bug but hostname -f is definitely picker in 10.04 than
it was in 9.10. I duplicated the
30 matches
Mail list logo
