[Bug 1011951] [NEW] package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: underproces installerede post-installation-script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1

2012-06-12 Thread Erik Berg
Public bug reported:

I don't know what I did, but it happened first time after an automatic
update

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu9
AptOrdering:
 bind9: Install
 bind9: Configure
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Jun 12 07:52:18 2012
ErrorMessage: underproces installerede post-installation-script returnerede 
afslutningsstatus 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110915.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 bind9utils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1
 apparmor   2.7.102-0ubuntu3
SourcePackage: bind9
Title: package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
underproces installerede post-installation-script returnerede afslutningsstatus 
1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-01 (41 days ago)
modified.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: 2012-05-01T08:01:08.952545

** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011951

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  underproces installerede post-installation-script returnerede
  afslutningsstatus 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011951/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011951] Re: package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: underproces installerede post-installation-script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1

2012-06-12 Thread Erik Berg
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011951

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  underproces installerede post-installation-script returnerede
  afslutningsstatus 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011951/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986892] Re: mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on purge

2012-06-12 Thread Clint Byrum
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: Triaged = In Progress

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)

** Tags added: lucid2precise oneiric2precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892

Title:
  mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on
  purge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/986892/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986892] Re: mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on purge

2012-06-12 Thread Clint Byrum
** Description changed:

+ [Test case]
+ Apparmor:
+ 1.Install dh-apparmor
+ 2. Build a package which build-depends on it (such as mysql-5.5)
+ 3. Extract debs which have dh_apparmor run on them into a dir in tmp with 
dpkg -e file.deb /tmp/foo
+ 4. Verify that the postrm has conditional logic to not remove the files under 
/etc/apparmor.d/*/* if the main profile exists.
+ 
+ Debhelper.
+ Same test case as above, but with debhelper providing dh_apparmor
+ 
+ MySQL 5.1 and MySQL 5.5 (oneiric, precise, lucid)
+ 1. install mysql-server
+ 2. check /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.1.postrm for conditional logic 
(change 5.1 to 5.5 for precise)
+ 3. for oneiric and lucid, upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04, verify that 
/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.mysqld is still present.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ The logic is extremely straight forward, so regressions seem unlikely. Still, 
at worst, purging will leave behind some useless files in /etc/apparmor.d which 
should not be of much concern anyway.
+ 
+ == Original bug description ==
+ 
  After upgrading from Kubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 beta I found that mysql
  isn't running after booting the system
  
  In the syslog there is the following row
  Apr 22 18:04:13 deathworld kernel: [   15.848658] init: mysql pre-start 
process (1033) terminated with status 1
  
  I've tried to execute /etc/init/mysql.conf step by step and found that 
execution
  /lib/init/apparmor-profile-load usr.sbin.mysqld
  shows the following error:
  AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld in 
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld at line 44: Could not open 
'local/usr.sbin.mysqld'
  It's line:
  #include local/usr.sbin.mysqld
  
  After removing this line mysql can start without any problems
  
- 
  Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
  Release:12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892

Title:
  mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on
  purge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/986892/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986892] Re: mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on purge

2012-06-12 Thread Clint Byrum
** Description changed:

+ MySQL 5.1 and 5.5 must be rebuilt with the updated debhelper/apparmor
+ and so cannot be verified until those fixes are complete.
+ 
  [Test case]
  Apparmor:
  1.Install dh-apparmor
  2. Build a package which build-depends on it (such as mysql-5.5)
  3. Extract debs which have dh_apparmor run on them into a dir in tmp with 
dpkg -e file.deb /tmp/foo
  4. Verify that the postrm has conditional logic to not remove the files under 
/etc/apparmor.d/*/* if the main profile exists.
  
  Debhelper.
  Same test case as above, but with debhelper providing dh_apparmor
  
  MySQL 5.1 and MySQL 5.5 (oneiric, precise, lucid)
  1. install mysql-server
  2. check /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.1.postrm for conditional logic 
(change 5.1 to 5.5 for precise)
  3. for oneiric and lucid, upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04, verify that 
/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.mysqld is still present.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  The logic is extremely straight forward, so regressions seem unlikely. Still, 
at worst, purging will leave behind some useless files in /etc/apparmor.d which 
should not be of much concern anyway.
  
  == Original bug description ==
  
  After upgrading from Kubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 beta I found that mysql
  isn't running after booting the system
  
  In the syslog there is the following row
  Apr 22 18:04:13 deathworld kernel: [   15.848658] init: mysql pre-start 
process (1033) terminated with status 1
  
  I've tried to execute /etc/init/mysql.conf step by step and found that 
execution
  /lib/init/apparmor-profile-load usr.sbin.mysqld
  shows the following error:
  AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld in 
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld at line 44: Could not open 
'local/usr.sbin.mysqld'
  It's line:
  #include local/usr.sbin.mysqld
  
  After removing this line mysql can start without any problems
  
  Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
  Release:12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892

Title:
  mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on
  purge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/986892/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011371] Re: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mysql-5.5 - 5.5.25-0ubuntu1

---
mysql-5.5 (5.5.25-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low

  * New upstream release (LP: #1011371, LP: #986892)
  * d/rules: change get-orig-source to pull from a working mirror.
  * d/control: Build with default compiler instead of gcc 4.5
 -- Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com   Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:34:14 -0700

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371

Title:
  mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/1011371/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986892] Re: mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on purge

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mysql-5.5 - 5.5.25-0ubuntu1

---
mysql-5.5 (5.5.25-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low

  * New upstream release (LP: #1011371, LP: #986892)
  * d/rules: change get-orig-source to pull from a working mirror.
  * d/control: Build with default compiler instead of gcc 4.5
 -- Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com   Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:34:14 -0700

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892

Title:
  mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on
  purge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/986892/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986892] Re: mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on purge

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/apparmor

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/mysql-5.5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892

Title:
  mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on
  purge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/986892/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986892] Re: mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on purge

2012-06-12 Thread Clint Byrum
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Triaged = In Progress

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Triaged = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Triaged = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892

Title:
  mysql-server postrm breaks apparmor profile for later versions on
  purge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/986892/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011981] [NEW] package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Eugene L
Public bug reported:

1. lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04

2. apt-cache policy bind9
bind9:
  Installed: 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1
  Candidate: 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 0
500 http://ua.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 
Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4 0
500 http://ua.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages

3. I'm starting software update tool
3. While updating, the process stops on bind9 package with error.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 12 10:40:21 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 bind9utils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1
 apparmor   2.7.102-0ubuntu3
SourcePackage: bind9
Title: package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-24 (18 days ago)
modified.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf: [modified]
modified.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf: 2011-11-30T15:12:37.672360
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: 2011-11-10T16:00:54.252429

** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011981

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011981/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011981] Re: package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Eugene L
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011981

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011981/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011981] Re: package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1009347 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009347

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1009347, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1009347
   package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011981

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011981/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
 so dropping a file there containing bind-interfaces
 and doing the relevant restart in postinst should
 make this automatic in most cases.


I notice that libvirt has just used this mechanism to solve a comparable 
problem (see ##928524).  Libvirt includes the file /etc/dnsmasq.d/libvirt-bin 
with the following contents.

bind-interfaces
except-interface=virbr0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Note that while bind-interfaces can be specified multiple times,
defining except-interfaces more than once is a syntax error in my
dnsmasq 2.59-4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011925] Re: cpu soft lockup in Centos guest using KVM 0.14.1

2012-06-12 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011925

Title:
  cpu soft lockup in Centos guest using KVM 0.14.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm/+bug/1011925/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011782] Re: samba core dump after upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04

2012-06-12 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011782

Title:
  samba core dump after upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1011782/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011640] Re: network configuration is not restored after host reboot

2012-06-12 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011640

Title:
  network configuration is not restored after host reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1011640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1000403] Re: [SRU] multi scheduler does not handle capabilities updates correctly

2012-06-12 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000403

Title:
  [SRU] multi scheduler does not handle capabilities updates correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1000403/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
It just occurred to me that if we are going to change someone's listen
address then it might be better to give 127.0.0.1 to nm-dnsmasq and
127.0.1.1 to the standalone nameserver.

Consider the case where nm-dnsmasq is running on a machine, nemo, that
happens to run the nameserver for the LAN.  /etc/hosts on nemo contains
either

127.0.0.1 localhost
127.0.1.1 nemo

or

127.0.0.1 localhost
10.1.2.3 nemo

where 10.1.2.3 is nemo's external IP address.

Other machines in the LAN access nemo via 10.1.2.3 for their general
name service.  If they are Ubuntu machines they also access their local
nm-dnsmasq instances via the loopback address.  It's nicely symmetrical
if processes on nemo itself also use the loopback address to access the
local nm-dnsmasq and use either the public address, 10.1.2.3 or its
substitute, 127.0.1.1, for general name service.

Perhaps this is only an aesthetic question.

Simon: Can we arrange by means of the file in /etc/dnsmasq.d/ that the
standalone dnsmasq listens on 127.0.1.1 rather than 127.0.0.1?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Alkis: Suppose your host, foo, has external IP address 10.1.2.3 and runs
a standalone nameserver which listens on eth0.  Configure things such
that nm-dnsmasq on foo uses 10.1.2.3 as its upstream nameserver;
configure the standalone nameserver on foo not to listen on lo.  If it's
dnsmasq, start it with --except-interface=lo.  Does this do what you
want?

If so then this may be a very simple way to deal with #959037, at least
with respect to dnsmasq.  Network-manager simply drops a file with

except-interface=lo

into /etc/dnsmasq.d/.  NM can still use the local standalone dnsmasq via
the external network interface, the address of which it may receive from
the DHCP server, for example.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Aha, you have to use except-interface=lo together with bind-
interfaces.  Sorry for all the messages!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Hmm, just tested this myself.  You can't use except-interface=lo; it
seems you have to use listen-address=10.1.2.3.  Perhaps Simon knows a
better way.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060

Title:
  packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012055] [NEW] package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Philippe Gaillard
Public bug reported:

after update ubuntu

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 12 10:22:07 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
SourcePackage: squid3
Title: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-25 (47 days ago)

** Affects: squid3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012055

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1012055/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012055] Re: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Philippe Gaillard
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012055

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1012055/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012055] Re: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012055

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1012055/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Oops, I changed the status to fix released but then realized that
#231060 wasn't addressed by 0.9.12-0ubuntu3.  The latter included

bind-interfaces
except-interface=virbr0

whereas to fix #231060 the following would be needed.

bind-interfaces
except-interface=vnet0

I don't have the power to revert the status change.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060

Title:
  packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

2012-06-12 Thread Loïc Minier
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060

Title:
  packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
I tested bind-interfaces and except-interface=lo in the past (comment
#26), it worked as advertised. I haven't yet tested them in the chained
dnsmasq mode, but I guess it would work if I'm using a static IP (which
isn't always the case for LTSP servers, some teachers use their laptops
for LTSP servers). With a dynamic IP, I'd have to open the NM-connection
editor all the time to update my primary DNS server. So a loopback
address for the dnsmasq service would be preferred locally, while the
non-loopback one would again be required for the LTSP clients.

 Network-manager simply drops a file with
except-interface=lo

What I meant in comment #51 is that libvirt then won't be able to ship with
 except-interface=lxcbr0
because it's a syntax error to specify 2 except-interface directives. Maybe it 
could be allowed in some future dnsmasq version, with the list of declared 
interfaces being merged.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Alkis wrote in #51:
 Note that while bind-interfaces can be specified multiple times,
 defining except-interfaces more than once is a syntax error in
 my dnsmasq 2.59-4.

Multiple except-interface options are accepted by dnsmasq 2.62-2.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012102] [NEW] Check all configuration files for except-interface lo

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Public bug reported:

In the start_resolvconf() function the initscript correctly refrains
from registering the loopback IP address with resolvconf if lo is in
DNSMASQ_EXCEPT.


start_resolvconf()
{
# If interface lo is explicitly disabled in /etc/default/dnsmasq
# Then dnsmasq won't be providing local DNS, so don't add it to
# the resolvconf server set.
for interface in $DNSMASQ_EXCEPT
do
[ $interface = lo ]  return
done


With the latest dnsmasq, however, options can also be added by means of 
configuration file parts in /etc/dnsmasq.d/.  This mechanism has already been 
used to exclude virbr interfaces (see #928524) and may be used in the future to 
exclude the lo interface (see #959037).  In anticipation of such uses the 
initscript should check configuration files for except-interface=lo and in 
its presence refrain from registering the loopback IP address with resolvconf.

** Affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012102

Title:
  Check all configuration files for except-interface lo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1012102/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997978] Re: KVM images lose connectivity with bridged network

2012-06-12 Thread Georg Leciejewski
@serge, thanks for your input. here Dom0 ifconfig, with 2 machines
running.

i setup br0 myself because the machines are running at hetzner, with
special addon IP's so the vm's can be reached from the outside.
(wiki.hetzner.de/index.php/KVM_mit_Nutzung_aller_IPs_-_the_easy_way) i
am also evaluating the problem with hetzner support to ensure its not
one of their routers in from of the Dom0.

vnet0, vnet1 are the bridges created by libvirt, but the vm have static
ip entries in /network/interfaces and are bound to br0 via libvirt.

--

br0   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr c8:60:00:e9:4a:2e  
  inet addr:176.9.126.xx  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
  inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fee9:4a2e/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:5852477 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:4403013 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
  RX bytes:2310013511 (2.3 GB)  TX bytes:2588138678 (2.5 GB)

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr c8:60:00:e9:4a:2e  
  inet addr:176.9.126.xx  Bcast:176.9.126.95  Mask:255.255.255.192
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:6623242 errors:0 dropped:35190 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:4668377 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
  RX bytes:2484375973 (2.4 GB)  TX bytes:1715146205 (1.7 GB)
  Interrupt:17 Memory:fe50-fe52 

loLink encap:Local Loopback  
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:59917 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:59917 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
  RX bytes:9106822 (9.1 MB)  TX bytes:9106822 (9.1 MB)

vnet0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fe:54:00:2e:3d:0e  
  inet6 addr: fe80::fc54:ff:fe2e:3d0e/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:2033457 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:2971987 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:500 
  RX bytes:1023321831 (1.0 GB)  TX bytes:1482597549 (1.4 GB)

vnet1 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fe:54:00:3f:2a:9c  
  inet6 addr: fe80::fc54:ff:fe3f:2a9c/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:124034 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:140178 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:500 
  RX bytes:27970351 (27.9 MB)  TX bytes:56681695 (56.6 MB)


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997978

Title:
  KVM images lose connectivity with bridged network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bridge-utils/+bug/997978/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

2012-06-12 Thread Serge Hallyn
@Thomas,

I'm probably wrong, but are you sure that vnet0 needs to be listed?
vnet0 is usually a nic bridged to either br0 or virbr0.  i would think
that dnsmasq would ignore bridged interfaces.

In fact, using just 'except-interface=virbr0' I brought up a kvm guest
(which had vnet0 as its nic on the host), and the libvirt dnsmasq was
the one to provide it with an ip address.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060

Title:
  packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Simon Kelley
On 12/06/12 10:05, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
 Note that while bind-interfaces can be specified multiple times,
 defining except-interfaces more than once is a syntax error in my
 dnsmasq 2.59-4.
 


Are you sure? That should be allowed.

Simon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998137] Re: [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

2012-06-12 Thread Chuck Short
** Summary changed:

- Keystone user tenant membership not always removed
+ [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998137

Title:
  [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/998137/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998137] Re: [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

2012-06-12 Thread Chuck Short
** Impact **

The fix for Bug #959294 removes tenant association before attempting to
delete the user to avoid a FK constraint error. On some configurations,
this is not always reliable. The integirty error still happens, although
subsequent attempts to delete user eventually succeed.

See shell log at http://paste.ubuntu.com/980372/

** Development Fix **

This has been addressed in https://review.openstack.org/7353 and fixed
in quantal

** Stable Fix **

This has been address in https://review.openstack.org/8403.

** Test case **

Please see http://paste.ubuntu.com/980372/

** Regression Potential **

Minimal this has been tested in the openstack-ci lab

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998137

Title:
  [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/998137/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Simon Kelley
On 12/06/12 11:24, Thomas Hood wrote:
 Hmm, just tested this myself.  You can't use except-interface=lo; it
 seems you have to use listen-address=10.1.2.3.  Perhaps Simon knows a
 better way.
 

If you want to listen on an address which doesn't appear on an interface
(ie 127.0.1.1) then you have to use --listen-address.

The rules for 127.0.0.1 are slightly arcane too: If you use -interface
and --except-interface, then dnsmasq will assume that you want it to
listen on the address of any loopback interfaces it finds as well. In
practise that means 127.0.0.1

So

dnsmasq --interface=eth0

will listen on the address(es) of eth0 and 127.0.0.1.

If you use --listen-address, then dnsmasq assumes you want more control
and only uses the addresses you actually give

so

dnsmasq --listen-address=127.0.1.1

will _not_ listen on 127.0.0.1


Given this, it makes sense to use 127.0.1.1 (or any address in
127.0.0.0/8 that doesn't appear on lo) for nm-dnsmasq. Because 127.0.1.1
doesn't appear on lo, another dnsmasq instance will not try and listen
on it, and the only thing required to get the two dnsmasq instances to
co-exist is --bind-interfaces.


Cheers,

Simon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997978] Re: KVM images lose connectivity with bridged network

2012-06-12 Thread Georg Leciejewski
Got this wrong:   
vnet0, vnet1 are the bridges created by libvirt, = are the network interface 
created by libvirt.

I am jsut reading this bug report concerning the MAC address problems:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571991
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583139

and so far it seems ok that the br0 still has the MAC of eth0 and the
VMs both start with FE::

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #571991
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571991

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #583139
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583139

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997978

Title:
  KVM images lose connectivity with bridged network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bridge-utils/+bug/997978/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012147] [NEW] lightdm: no graphical login for nis user

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

If I install a Ubuntu 12.04 system from scratch, everything works fine,
but if I want to use nis package to allow nis user to login, I cannot. I
have to insert the following line into /etc/lightdm/lighdm.conf:

greeter-show-manual-login=true

Otherwise one cannot login as a nis user from login manager lightdm.
From my point of view, this has to be done automatically during
installation of nis or ldap client packages.

Alex

** Affects: nis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: bot-comment
-- 
lightdm: no graphical login for nis user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1001846] Re: cobbler fails to install with error code 1

2012-06-12 Thread Andres Rodriguez
Hi There,

Sorry for the late reply. Would you be able to test the following patch
in order to verify this has been fixed? The patch can be found in [1].

Once the patch is applied and you should be able to do:

sudo apt-get -f install

or

sudo dpkg --configure -a

and the installation will resume. Once this is done, please check that
the server: and next_server: value have been updated correctly in
/etc/cobbler/settings.

Thanks again!
[1]: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1037548/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001846

Title:
  cobbler fails to install with error code 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/1001846/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012147] Re: lightdm: no graphical login for nis user

2012-06-12 Thread alex jordan
** Package changed: ubuntu = nis (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012147

Title:
  lightdm: no graphical login for nis user

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1012147/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-openstack-ha] OpenStack HA

2012-06-12 Thread Andres Rodriguez
Blueprint changed by Andres Rodriguez:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [nijaba] Connect to Russel Bryant about RabbitMQ HA: TODO
  [andreserl] Update pacemaker: DONE
- Update corosync: TODO
- Update heartbeat: TODO
- Update openais: TODO
+ [andreserl] Update corosync: TODO
+ [andreserl] Update heartbeat: TODO
+ [andreserl] Update openais: TODO
  [andreserl] Update RHCS: DONE
  [andreserl] Forward RHCS packages to Debian: INPROGRESS
- Update DRBD: TODO
- Track GlanceAPI, Glance Registry, Keystone RA's, and ensure they hit the 
archive.: TODO
+ [andreserl] Update DRBD: TODO
+ [andreserl] Track GlanceAPI, Glance Registry, Keystone RA's, and ensure they 
hit the archive.: TODO
  juju charm for pacemaker: TODO
  juju charm for corosync: TODO
  juju charms for DRBD (adam_g says it is impossible, SpampS seems it is 
possible): TODO
  MySQL HA juju charm: TODO
  Investigate HA for Horizon (memcached HA): TODO

-- 
OpenStack HA
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-ha

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1003842] Re: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-equivalent nameservers

2012-06-12 Thread Logan Rosen
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #675319
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675319

** Also affects: dnsmasq (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675319
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842

Title:
  dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-
  equivalent nameservers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009974] Re: nova live-migration fails silently

2012-06-12 Thread Hokuto Hoshi
Hi,

I had the same problem, and I couldn't solve it by above ways (remove
double quote and add live_migration_flag in nova.conf).

VM (on Host1 ) - Host2
Host1's ip address is 192.168.0.1
Host2's ip address is 192.168.0.2

I set the configuration of VNC in nova.conf as below:
# on Host1
vncserver_proxyclient_address=192.168.0.1
vncserver_listen=192.168.0.1

# on Host2
vncserver_proxyclient_address=192.168.0.2
vncserver_listen=192.168.0.2

I got traffic logs of libvirt between servers and found the xml file and the 
entry of VNC settings that is transferred before migration.
It is maybe invalid because it still contains the ip address of Host1. I think 
it should contain the ip address of Host2.

graphics type='vnc' port='5900' autoport='yes' listen='192.168.0.1' 
keymap='ja'
  listen type='address' address='192.168.0.1'/
/graphics

So, I changed nova.conf on Host1 and Host2:
# on Host1
vncserver_proxyclient_address=192.168.0.1
vncserver_listen=0.0.0.0

# on Host2
vncserver_proxyclient_address=192.168.0.2
vncserver_listen=0.0.0.0

After change, I restarted nova-compute, relaunched instances and tried
live-migration. VNC and live-migration worked fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009974

Title:
  nova live-migration fails silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1009974/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1003842] Re: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-equivalent nameservers

2012-06-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Debian)
   Status: Unknown = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842

Title:
  dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-
  equivalent nameservers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
(Executive summary of the following: I think we should fix this by
making nm-dnsmasq listen at ::1.)

Thanks for your much-needed help, Simon.

It is good to know that the except-interface avenue is available.  We
want, however, to be able to enjoy the advantages of non-bind-interfaces
mode (unbound mode??) in standalone dnsmasq insofar as we can.
Certainly standalone dnsmasq should continue to run in unbound mode when
n-m is not installed or when nm-dnsmasq is not in use; so ideally we
would ensure that /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf contains
dns=dnsmasq if and only if /etc/dnsmasq.d/nm-dnsmasq contains bind-
interfaces except-interface=lo.  I don't see a very easy way to ensure
this.

In any case it would be better if we never had to force dnsmasq into
bind-interfaces mode.

So instead of switching the nm-dnsmasq listen address from 127.0.0.1 to
127.0.1.1 it seems better to switch that address to ::1: no more
difficult, yet in the latter case standalone dnsmasq can continue to run
in unbound mode as it has traditionally done (unless forced into bind-
interfaces mode by something like libvirt-bin, of course).

Implementing the change to ::1 shouldn't be too hard.
* It's a one-line change to network-manager where it starts dnsmasq and another 
one-line change where it register's the latter's address with resolvconf.
On a system with n-m and no standalone dnsmasq this will result in 
/etc/resolv.conf containing nameserver ::1 and the resolver will connect to 
nm-dnsmasq.  On a system with standalone dnsmasq and no n-m this will be no 
different from the traditional state of affairs, with /etc/resolv.conf 
containing nameserver 127.0.0.1 and the resolver connecting to standalone 
dnsmasq.
On a system with both n-m and standalone dnsmasq this will *also* result in 
/etc/resolv.conf containing nameserver 127.0.0.1 and the resolver connecting 
to standalone dnsmasq.  This is probably unwanted, but is easily fixed by
* changing network-manager so that it registers the ::1 address under the name 
nm-dnsmasq (name open to discussion) instead of under the name 
NetworkManager (which can still be used for registering external nameserver 
information in the dns!=dnsmasq case);
* changing resolvconf so that it includes the pattern nm-dns at the top of 
/etc/resolvconf/interface-order.
Then on a system with both n-m and dnsmasq, /etc/resolv.conf will contain 
nameserver ::1 and the resolver will use nm-dnsmasq. 

The remaining challenge then is to see to it that NM sends the address
127.0.0.1 to nm-dnsmasq via /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf when there is a
local nameserver running that provides general name service.  This would
probably have to be configurable via the GUI since it's hard to tell
whether or not a locally running nameserver provides general name
service.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012102] Re: Check all configuration files for except-interface lo

2012-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
I filed this because I thought that even if we don't decide to deal with
#959037 by means of except-interface=lo, this is a change that would
be good to make anyway.

But on second thought, this would just be one hack on top of another.
Dnsmasq has several options governing which interfaces and addresses it
listens on and several different files (/etc/dnsmasq.conf,
/etc/init.d/dnsmasq, /etc/default/dnsmasq, /etc/dnsmasq.d/*) that can
affect the option list.  To be completely correct the initscript would
have to read all these configuration files and duplicate dnsmasq's logic
in interpreting them, before it could know whether or not dnsmasq
listens on 127.0.0.1.  Furthermore the admin may not want 127.0.0.1
registered with resolvconf even if dnsmasq listens on it, or may want a
non-loopback address registered with resolvconf when dnsmasq doesn't
listen on any loopback address

I conclude that we should only make the initscript as complex as
necessary, and not more so.  I'll mark this as invalid until it's clear
that the change is really needed.

** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012102

Title:
  Check all configuration files for except-interface lo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1012102/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010473] Re: [SRU] Tracker for 12.04 Openstack Updates

2012-06-12 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Chuck, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glance into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010473

Title:
  [SRU] Tracker for 12.04 Openstack Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1010473/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998137] Re: [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

2012-06-12 Thread Brian Murray
Putting everything in one place, here is the test case:

ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ tenant_id=$(keystone tenant-create --name 
testingtenant | grep id | awk '{ print $4 }')
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ user_id=$(keystone user-create --name testinguser 
--pass testing --tenant_id $tenant_id | grep id | awk '{ print $4 }')
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ echo $user_id
e5e045e898694f46a55fb9483a1c03c4
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ keystone user-delete $user_id
No handlers could be found for logger keystoneclient.client
An unexpected error prevented the server from fulfilling your request. 
(IntegrityError) (1451, 'Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key 
constraint fails (`keystone`.`user_tenant_membership`, CONSTRAINT 
`user_tenant_membership_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `user` 
(`id`))') 'DELETE FROM user WHERE user.id = %s' 
('e5e045e898694f46a55fb9483a1c03c4',) (HTTP 500)
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ keystone user-delete $user_id
No handlers could be found for logger keystoneclient.client
An unexpected error prevented the server from fulfilling your request. 
(IntegrityError) (1451, 'Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key 
constraint fails (`keystone`.`user_tenant_membership`, CONSTRAINT 
`user_tenant_membership_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `user` 
(`id`))') 'DELETE FROM user WHERE user.id = %s' 
('e5e045e898694f46a55fb9483a1c03c4',) (HTTP 500)
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ keystone user-delete $user_id
No handlers could be found for logger keystoneclient.client
An unexpected error prevented the server from fulfilling your request. 
(IntegrityError) (1451, 'Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key 
constraint fails (`keystone`.`user_tenant_membership`, CONSTRAINT 
`user_tenant_membership_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `user` 
(`id`))') 'DELETE FROM user WHERE user.id = %s' 
('e5e045e898694f46a55fb9483a1c03c4',) (HTTP 500)
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ keystone user-delete $user_id
No handlers could be found for logger keystoneclient.client
An unexpected error prevented the server from fulfilling your request. 
(IntegrityError) (1451, 'Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key 
constraint fails (`keystone`.`user_tenant_membership`, CONSTRAINT 
`user_tenant_membership_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `user` 
(`id`))') 'DELETE FROM user WHERE user.id = %s' 
('e5e045e898694f46a55fb9483a1c03c4',) (HTTP 500)
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$ keystone user-delete $user_id
ubuntu@ip-10-252-87-70:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998137

Title:
  [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/998137/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959294] Re: [SRU] Can't delete users

2012-06-12 Thread Chuck Short
** Impact **

Remove users' tenant membership on user deletion. Resolves a FK
constraint issue that previously went unnoticed due to testing against
database  configurations that do not support FK constraints (MyISAM).

** Development Fix **

This has been resolved in the development trunk at
https://review.openstack.org/6216 and in quantal.

** Stable Fix **

This has been resolved in the stable essex/trunk at
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/7353/

**Test Case **

http://paste.ubuntu.com/980372/

** Regression Possiblity **

Minimal, removing a user shouldnt result in a regression.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959294

Title:
  [SRU] Can't delete users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/959294/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009514] Re: Lucid hangs during update of bind9-host

2012-06-12 Thread Erdal Ronahi
If you tell me where to look for a log file I will gladly send it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009514

Title:
  Lucid hangs during update of bind9-host

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1009514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010473] Please test proposed package

2012-06-12 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Chuck, or anyone else affected,

Accepted keystone into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010473

Title:
  [SRU] Tracker for 12.04 Openstack Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1010473/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998137] Re: [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

2012-06-12 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,

Accepted keystone into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998137

Title:
  [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/998137/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959294] Re: [SRU] Can't delete users

2012-06-12 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Soren, or anyone else affected,

Accepted keystone into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959294

Title:
  [SRU] Can't delete users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/959294/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011362] Re: Groovy crashes at startup on Quantal: jline targets Java 7 only

2012-06-12 Thread Martin Jackson
Groovysh now starts as expected.  Thanks for fixing this!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to groovy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011362

Title:
  Groovy crashes at startup on Quantal: jline targets Java 7 only

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groovy/+bug/1011362/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-12 Thread Micah Gersten
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-12 Thread Steve Beattie
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Beattie (sbeattie)

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Beattie (sbeattie)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998137] Re: [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/keystone

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998137

Title:
  [SRU] Keystone user tenant membership not always removed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/998137/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959294] Re: [SRU] Can't delete users

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/keystone

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959294

Title:
  [SRU] Can't delete users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/959294/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-12 Thread Simon Kelley
On 12/06/12 20:31, Thomas Hood wrote:
 (Executive summary of the following: I think we should fix this by
 making nm-dnsmasq listen at ::1.)

 Thanks for your much-needed help, Simon.

 It is good to know that the except-interface avenue is available.  We
 want, however, to be able to enjoy the advantages of non-bind-interfaces
 mode (unbound mode??) in standalone dnsmasq insofar as we can.
 Certainly standalone dnsmasq should continue to run in unbound mode when
 n-m is not installed or when nm-dnsmasq is not in use; so ideally we
 would ensure that /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf contains
 dns=dnsmasq if and only if /etc/dnsmasq.d/nm-dnsmasq contains bind-
 interfaces except-interface=lo.  I don't see a very easy way to ensure
 this.

 In any case it would be better if we never had to force dnsmasq into
 bind-interfaces mode.

 So instead of switching the nm-dnsmasq listen address from 127.0.0.1 to
 127.0.1.1 it seems better to switch that address to ::1: no more
 difficult, yet in the latter case standalone dnsmasq can continue to run
 in unbound mode as it has traditionally done (unless forced into bind-
 interfaces mode by something like libvirt-bin, of course).

I don't think that's true. In unbound mode, the standalone dnsmasq will 
bind the IPv6 wildcard address, which will stop the nm-dnsmasq from 
binding ::1 There's no escape in IPv6 land. Indeed the situation is 
worse, because as far a I know, you can't use any address in the defined 
subnet for loopback, it has to be ::1, so except-interface=lo is required.

I think the 127.0.1.1 (or whatever) answer is the best. Unfortunately 
there's no way round having to set --bind-interfaces on the standalone 
dnsmasq, but except-interface=lo is not required as long as the 
127.0.0.0/8 address in use by nm-dnsmasq doesn't appear on the lo interface.

Simon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 962615] Re: [SRU] Unable to list volumes after building from snapshot

2012-06-12 Thread Chuck Short
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962615

Title:
  [SRU] Unable to list volumes after building from snapshot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/962615/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package nova - 2012.1-0ubuntu2.3

---
nova (2012.1-0ubuntu2.3) precise-security; urgency=low

  * REGRESSION FIX: security group without protocol set failure (LP: #1010514)
- debian/patches/CVE-2012-2654-regression.patch: only call .lower()
  when a protocol has been set.
 -- Steve Beattie sbeat...@ubuntu.com   Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:00:50 -0700

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2654

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package nova - 2011.3-0ubuntu6.8

---
nova (2011.3-0ubuntu6.8) oneiric-security; urgency=low

  * REGRESSION FIX: security group without protocol set failure (LP: #1010514)
- debian/patches/CVE-2012-2654-regression.patch: only call .lower()
  when a protocol has been set.
 -- Steve Beattie sbeat...@ubuntu.com   Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:20:19 -0700

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010514] Re: Source group based security group rule without protocol and port causes failures

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-security/nova

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/oneiric-security/nova

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010514

Title:
  Source group based security group rule without protocol and port
  causes failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1010514/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012419] [NEW] Sync request: euca2ools from Debian sid (main)2.0.2-1

2012-06-12 Thread Brian Thomason
Public bug reported:

The current version of euca2ools in Precise is a beta version and has
broken eustore scripts in it.  We have removed the eustore scripts
altogether and Debian has sponsored the upload into Sid.  It
incorporates the last Ubuntu fix needed as well, so a straight sync
should suffice.

** Affects: euca2ools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012419

Title:
  Sync request: euca2ools from Debian sid (main)2.0.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/euca2ools/+bug/1012419/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998991] Re: python-keystone suggests unavailable package

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~logatron/ubuntu/quantal/keystone/fix-for-998991
-and-new-upstream

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998991

Title:
  python-keystone suggests unavailable package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/998991/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2012-06-12 Thread Mohamed
just for the noobs who reach here searching for a temporary solution:
mount your root partition as r/w (e.g. using live CD) then issue the following 
commands
$ cd /
$ sudo rm run
$ sudo mkdir -p run

that did the tick with me!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908614

Title:
  /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian-base-files/+bug/908614/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011630] Re: [MIR] six

2012-06-12 Thread Matthias Klose
looks ok.

2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFOOverride Component to: 'main'
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'six - 1.1.0-2/main/python' remained the same
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python-six-1.1.0-2/universe/python/OPTIONAL' 
binary overridden in quantal/amd64
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python-six-1.1.0-2/universe/python/OPTIONAL' 
binary overridden in quantal/armel
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python-six-1.1.0-2/universe/python/OPTIONAL' 
binary overridden in quantal/armhf
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python-six-1.1.0-2/universe/python/OPTIONAL' 
binary overridden in quantal/i386
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python-six-1.1.0-2/universe/python/OPTIONAL' 
binary overridden in quantal/powerpc
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python3-six-1.1.0-2/main/python/OPTIONAL' remained 
the same
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python3-six-1.1.0-2/main/python/OPTIONAL' remained 
the same
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python3-six-1.1.0-2/main/python/OPTIONAL' remained 
the same
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python3-six-1.1.0-2/main/python/OPTIONAL' remained 
the same
2012-06-12 23:49:10 INFO'python3-six-1.1.0-2/main/python/OPTIONAL' remained 
the same
Confirm this transaction? [yes, no] yes
2012-06-12 23:52:40 INFOTransaction committed.


** Changed in: six (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to six in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011630

Title:
  [MIR] six

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/six/+bug/1011630/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998991] Re: python-keystone suggests unavailable package

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~logatron/ubuntu/quantal/keystone/fix-for-998991
-and-new-upstream

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998991

Title:
  python-keystone suggests unavailable package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/998991/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012468] [NEW] package mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.15-3ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Alex
Public bug reported:

I have tried to uninstall and led me to apport applications to submit
this bug without any further info attached to it.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.15-3ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-15.60-server 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-15-server x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 12 22:26:23 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Pinguy OS 11.04.1 64-Bit - Release amd64
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: dovecot
Title: package mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.15-3ubuntu2.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012468

Title:
  package mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.15-3ubuntu2.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1012468/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012468] Re: package mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.15-3ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Alex
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012468

Title:
  package mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.15-3ubuntu2.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1012468/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006189] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

2012-06-12 Thread Sam
See bug 1012475 affecting change logs (aptitude changelogs) for
apparmor, which is related.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006189

Title:
  Changelogs not visible for recent updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1006189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006189] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

2012-06-12 Thread Sam
Also see bug 1012478 which was reported against aptitude.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006189

Title:
  Changelogs not visible for recent updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1006189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 975781] Re: package quota 4.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for quota (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975781

Title:
  package quota 4.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
  post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/975781/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 950485] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for samba (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950485

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/950485/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006189] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

2012-06-12 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006189

Title:
  Changelogs not visible for recent updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1006189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 995523] Re: squid3 is killed by /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3 in Precise

2012-06-12 Thread D J Gardner
Since applying the patch my server is now getting good at hitting another squid 
 bug:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/988802 
Since that one is related to reconfiguring the cache during cache-rebuild, I 
don't find that surprising. 

I expect that this will be the case for anyone else who hits this bug,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995523

Title:
  squid3 is killed by /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3 in Precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/995523/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988802] Re: squid3 killed by ABRT signal. assertion failed: disk.cc377: fd = 0

2012-06-12 Thread D J Gardner
My trial patch to solve bug #995523 squid3 is killed by 
/etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid3 , now lets this bug be triggered instead. 
That bug was caused by squid receiving a HUP before the signal handler has been 
configured.  My patch just moved the HUP handler earlier. Thus a reconfigure as 
soon as the reconfigure checks start being done.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988802

Title:
  squid3 killed by ABRT signal. assertion failed: disk.cc377: fd = 0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/squid/+bug/988802/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs