[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

2013-05-13 Thread Ben Shadwick
** Also affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619 Title: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative To

[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

2013-05-15 Thread Ben Shadwick
Huh? The only change was that I tried to raise it from the dead, and it got smacked right back down into the wishlist bin :( 2 of the 3 hottest issues for the ubuntu-meta package are in triaged:wishlist state, and this is one of them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2014-07-11 Thread Ben Shadwick
Adding ubuntu-meta because ntpdate lists it as a dependency, when ntpd should be allowed as an alternative. ** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2014-07-11 Thread Ben Shadwick
Oops, I meant it the other way around: ubuntu-minimal lists ntpdate as a dependency, such that ubuntu-minimal is uninstalled if you try to replace ntpdate with ntpd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.

[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-04-19 Thread Ben Shadwick
@aquina: ntpd doesn't have to be shipped with a configuration that will launch it as a daemon. It can easily be used to do ntpdate's job without daemonizing. Also, the ntpd binary is actually only around 2/3 the size of the ntpdate binary, so I think you may be backwards on which one is bloated.