[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

FYI - the merge itself would be complete, but while testing I found an issue introduced in some former ubuntu delta that would now kill the configuration of an already installed nis on update (bad handling of conffiles). We will have to create a fix for this transition before we can go on with

[Bug 1512980] Re: Please enable PPS in the Ubuntu build of ntpd

Some initial analysis to support further decisions Version check Version upstream 4.2.8p4 2015/10/21 Latest versions in Ubuntu 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.6 | precise-security 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.5 | trusty-security 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu6.2 | vivid-security

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) ** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

FYI - After a discussion I'll likely revamp the patches for wily and upstream the next days. Until then we will also decide if this is worth SRUs for trusty/vivid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

** Patch added: "Fix for upstream" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/525674/+attachment/4486128/+files/upstream_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

Other MOTD plugins use caching, for example /usr/lib/update-notifier/update-motd-reboot-required does: if [ -f /var/run/reboot-required ]; then cat /var/run/reboot-required fi Actually /usr/lib/update-notifier/update-motd-updates-available already uses "caching" like the others. It

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

** Patch added: "Fix for vivid" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/525674/+attachment/4486126/+files/vivid_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

** Patch added: "Fix for trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/525674/+attachment/4486125/+files/trusty_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

** Patch added: "Fix for wily" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/525674/+attachment/4486127/+files/wily_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

Here the bigger, but more architecturally complete solution for wily (which is actually identical at this time). Summary: - move the actual updating part out of the pam based trigger completely (avoids slowdown) - pam based motd now only prints the cached info (if existing) - hook into apt with

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

** Patch added: "Enhanced fix for Wily and Upstream" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/525674/+attachment/4487279/+files/wily_and_dev_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

** Patch added: "Enhanced fix for Wily and Upstream (version 3)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/525674/+attachment/4489492/+files/wily_and_dev_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 525674] Re: apt-check hangs, preventing login via SSH

Martin: - I already removed one indirection with my former patch and love to remove one more. Simple code = good code - thanks for the good hint. - I changed it slightly to use the existing variable so people recognize from which code it came and to avoid issues if one ever changes only one

[Bug 1245604] Re: "killall -u snmp" in a pre-install step kills any running snmpd

snmp and snmpd are part of one source being: net-snmp I could confirm that this still affects wily/upstream The killall was introduced way back by * debian/snmp.preinst, debian/snmp.prerm: kill any/all processes owned by snmp user before install/uninstall, LP: #573391 -- Dustin Kirkland

[Bug 1245604] Re: "killall -u snmp" in a pre-install step kills any running snmpd

** Patch added: "debdiff for wily and upstream" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1245604/+attachment/4489741/+files/wily_and_dev_package.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1492604] Re: python3-memcached uses invalid string handling

As described by Robie versions are: precise: n/a trusty: n/a vivid: 1.53+2014.06.08.git.918 wily: 1.56-1 To reproduce the issue I installed the tool and wrote a minimal test wrapper based on online examples - and hey it is fairly short (not even worth an attachment). #!/usr/bin/env python3

[Bug 1492604] Re: python3-memcached uses invalid string handling

** Patch added: "backport of the fix that was upstream in python3-memcache 1.54" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-memcache/+bug/1492604/+attachment/4484805/+files/fix-python3-memcache-str-handling-rebase1.53.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1492604] Re: python3-memcached uses invalid string handling

I can confirm that with this as backport applied the testcase runs fine. ** Changed in: python-memcache (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python-memcache (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification b

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

First of all thanks for checking the fix. and yes so far it is only released for Xenial (16.04). Given the time it was open and the amount of feedback we have got I assumed it wouldn't be worth an SRU - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. I'm still not sure if it is worth an SRU given

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

I looked into it more in detail - It is actually a bigger change than just reusing what we did for Xenial. Since for Xenial we did a lot of cleanup regarding upstart we can't just "reuse" what we have for trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 1532571] [NEW] kvm crashes host kernel on trusty+hwe-w (unable to handle kernel paging request in __mtrr_lookup_var_next)

Public bug reported: When building the test environment for subiquity I end up with an image I can run with qemu/kvm. And I realized that this works fine with the Trusty kernel (Host), but when running on trusty+hwe-t (4.2.0-23-generic) it reliably crashes my host (not only the guest). On the

[Bug 1532571] Re: kvm crashes host kernel on trusty+hwe-w (unable to handle kernel paging request in __mtrr_lookup_var_next)

** Attachment added: "two of the bug on messages I found in dmesg after restarting my system" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm/+bug/1532571/+attachment/4547455/+files/subiquity-installer-triggers-kernel-bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1534090] Re: 'call to get_tasks_recursive failed' errors from su

I can use cgm to do some getrecursive calls without issue, like this: cgm gettasksrecursive freezer With that I think my quick debugging has reached its end, but lets assign to the proper components now that we know. ** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => cgmanager (Ubuntu) -- You received

[Bug 1492186] Re: [MIR] dpdk

I wanted to summarize that we addressed all MIR feedback. Note: Also the merge to DPDK2.2 is done and in universe for a few days now. So @Seth/Michael - does this qualify for your conditional ACK in post #16 and we are fine to go now and promote it to main? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1492186] Re: [MIR] dpdk

Regarding the State in Debian: I filed an ITP offering joint effort work on it. If someone in Debian cares about dpdk we would keep it "compatible" together, if not we have no collision. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815760 Regarding Tests As I mentioned multiple times the

[Bug 1547517] Re: libdpdk should link against the library it uses

I was working on a fix to bring it upstream first, but there our old discussion with a wider scope got picked up again. => http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/9088/ There are always tradeoffs to be made and we had quite some discussions on so-versioning and such I don't want to go in to, but the

[Bug 1546547] Re: DPDK shared library versioning

FYI - the linker script solution seems to be refreshed and picked up for 2.3 http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/9088/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546547 Title:

[Bug 1547517] Re: libdpdk should link against the library it uses

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547517 Title: libdpdk should link agai

[Bug 1549672] [NEW] Default config files don't match postfix 3

Public bug reported: With the recent merge to postfix 3 there were quite some changes to its configuration. Now postfix has a lot to handle those changes in a compatible way so that old configurations should transfer to postfix 3 as good as possible. In case any incompatibilities occur it

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Hi, I couldn't reproduce today. The device stays in: 0:0:0:1074675728 sdb 8:16 active faulty offline And when re-adding it comes back online just nice. The way I configured was via chzdev like: I used the z/VM approach with detaching the FCP adapter. I used the multipath.conf as reported

[Bug 1551158] Re: DPDK dep8 tests failing on non supported platforms

After discussing on #ubuntu-devel it was decided that the tests should guard themselves and skip the test if not appropriate. Such specific HW need seems rare and there is no e.g. autopkgtest feature to limit Architectures. Note: it was considered a "regression" because the fact that before we

[Bug 1551158] Re: DPDK dep8 tests failing on non supported platforms

FYI - this started on Friday and while we were almost done right now it is worth to document this for further reference e.g. from the Changelogs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1551158] [NEW] DPDK dep8 tests failing on non supported platforms

Public bug reported: While adding further tests we realized that DPDK tests would fail on non supported platforms. While it makes perfect sense for them to fail, most involved people wondered why it even ran there. Long story short: The dpdk package builds packages for all platforms like

[Bug 1492186] Re: [MIR] dpdk

[...] - Needs a team bug subscriber => FYI - Done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492186 Title: [MIR] dpdk To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1546547] [NEW] DPDK shared library versioning

Public bug reported: The upstream DPDK project does not keep sover's on their combined library. There was some great work to properly version all the sublibraries going into For now we have to live with the state as (deliver as sover 0) is and all its implications like complex

[Bug 1546550] Re: openvswitch-switch-dpdk links against libdpdk statically

More an openvswitch-switch-dpdk than a pure dpdk issue, but should be tracked in both. ** Package changed: dpdk (Ubuntu) => openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1546550] [NEW] openvswitch-switch-dpdk links against libdpdk statically

Public bug reported: One might think it has no DPDK support when liiking at it as well as this is kind of an exception of the usual library handling. So for example openvswitch-switch-dpdk depends on libdpdk0 which seems right. But in fact it would not have to as it is build with that library

[Bug 1546556] [NEW] Dropping privileges in openvswitch-switch via --user is incompatible with --dpdk

Public bug reported: Openvswitch has a nice security feature where one can drop privileges via --user option. Unfortunately due to the nature of DPDK it needs root permissions to initialize most of its resources. Thereby --dpdk and --user are mutually exclusive. There are upstream discussions

[Bug 1546565] [NEW] Ownership/Permissions of vhost_user sockets for openvswitch-dpdk make them unusable by libvirt/qemu/kvm

Public bug reported: As of today the vhost_user sockets created by openvswitch have root:root file ownership. In fact creation is actually done by code the DPDK lib, but the path is passed to it from openvswitch. The API called to DPDK has no notion of ownership/groups. It just "inherits" what

[Bug 1538664] Re: Please enable ppc64el on dpdk

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664 Title: Please enable ppc64el on dpdk To manage notifications about

[Bug 1539775] Re: Enable ppc64el on dpdk

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775

[Bug 1547517] [NEW] libdpdk should link against the library it uses

Public bug reported: See: ldd usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdpdk.so.0 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7ffc977e3000)

[Bug 1547528] [NEW] How to handle specific HW needs for dep8 tests in CI

Public bug reported: It all started out as a typical case of "something happened". Looking at the CI history of openvswitch-dpdk at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/openvswitch-dpdk/xenial/amd64/. We weren't sure if the test machines or any other part of the execution changed. But due to

Re: [Bug 1547528] [NEW] How to handle specific HW needs for dep8 tests in CI

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Martin Pitt <martin.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > ChristianEhrhardt [2016-02-19 14:02 -]: > [...] > > But later infinity pointed out if we shouldn't bump our scalingstack > > machine configs as all underlying HW would support that. In

[Bug 1547528] Re: How to handle specific HW needs for dep8 tests in CI

Sharing a few good statements from a chat with infinity with all participants on this bug And from me thanks Adam for these insights to part of Ubuntus build/test history. Quoting Infinity: "We'd want scalingstack buildds and autopkgtest to match if we're changing machine type. Having

[Bug 1547528] Re: How to handle specific HW needs for dep8 tests in CI

** Also affects: autopkgtest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547528 Title: How to handle specific HW needs for

[Bug 1546565] Re: Ownership/Permissions of vhost_user sockets for openvswitch-dpdk make them unusable by libvirt/qemu/kvm

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546565 Title: Ownership/Permissions of vhost_user sockets for

[Bug 1546556] Re: Dropping privileges in openvswitch-switch via --user is incompatible with --dpdk

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546556 Title: Dropping privileges in openvswitch-switch via --user is

[Bug 1517075] Re: dpdk-dev contains no makefile templates

I still expected smb to do this, so I missed that - sorry. Verifying: 1. verified the issue before proposed 2. updated to proposed 3. I see the mk missing issues gone: e.g. those appear no more: Makefile:39: /usr/share/dpdk/mk/rte.vars.mk: No such file or directory Makefile:50:

[Bug 1516543] Re: dpdk-init depends on executables in /usr/bin

I still expected smb to do this, so I missed that - sorry. Verifying: 1. verified the issue before proposed 2. updated to proposed 3. I see the critical calls removed in the init script -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1517075] Re: dpdk-dev contains no makefile templates

It has to be noted that the steps-to-reproduce have other issues to build the l2fwd as-is, but the issue addressed with this bug is indeed fixed. ** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1516543] Re: dpdk-init depends on executables in /usr/bin

** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516543 Title: dpdk-init depends on executables

[Bug 1557116] [NEW] hwup very noisy fails on each boot for unconfigured devices

Public bug reported: In System z one often has plenty of devices in the channel subsystem but only a few of them configured. Currently /etc/sysconfig/scripts/hardware/hwup /etc/sysconfig/scripts/hardware/functions Print a log message like this: Mär 14 09:30:43 s1lp5 systemd-udevd[1169]: Process

[Bug 1557532] [NEW] dpdk fails to use 1G huge pages depending on the available mountpoints

script, but actually even when mounting a 1G mountpoint it fails. It needs to be debugged in what way it expects a non-default size hugepage mount and then provided by dpdk init scripts OR fixed in dpdk code. ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt

[Bug 1557532] Re: dpdk fails to use 1G huge pages depending on the available mountpoints

Check code opens /proc/mounts gets pagesz_str defining what the mountpoint has if nothing is set assume default size if something is set in the mp's options calculate the size check if this is the mountpoint matching => not working for my mountpoint Need to be run in gdb, to check where exactly

[Bug 1557532] Re: dpdk fails to use 1G huge pages depending on the available mountpoints

The detection failure was a false positive. The following would provide a sufficient mount point. sudo mount -thugetlbfs hugetlbfs /dev/hugepages-1G -o "pagesize=1G" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1557532] Re: dpdk fails to use 1G huge pages depending on the available mountpoints

It seems we have to decide if we want to hardcode a directory path for the non-default mountpoint or if we want to replicate dpdks logic to parse and detect (including size recalculations). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

Re: [Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

Hi, I realized that bug seems dormant :-/ So I wanted to let you know that I keep this unread in my inbox all the time. It juts currently buried under other priorities. But I really intend to take a closer look at a potential SRU as soon as I can. Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu

[Bug 1557532] Re: dpdk fails to use 1G huge pages depending on the available mountpoints

I have working code, but found various other combinations - like if one pages size isn't supported at all - that I have to take care of first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1529355] Re: authzprovideralias-defined authz provider can't be used in Ubuntu14

Thank you Hikari Kobayashi for reporting the issue and even doing the work identifying the patch. This was backported to 2.4.11 and therefore obviously is also in 2.4.18. Thereby Xenial and Wily are not affected. Note: This is a regression 2.2.22 (precise) -> 2.4.7 (trusty) since migrating from

[Bug 1527906] Re: server crash on login

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively"

[Bug 1463635] Re: Apache2 waits indefinetely when reloading

Hi, you are right that default configurations should be sane. I totally like your report on the potential DOS, by keeping a connection open and so stalling the restart forever. So I don't just want you or me to close it. But then the GracefulShutdownTimeout being zero is the apache default - not

[Bug 1558485] [NEW] init script can fail when devices are unassigned

a remaining tr change o - to _ which is wrong, see bug 1554214. Both should be fixed, so that in case an admin or experiment unassigned devices and wants to get back to normal by restarting the script would not fail. ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt

[Bug 1559912] [NEW] Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally failing for virtio PMD

cal Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559912 Title: Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally failing for virtio

[Bug 1559912] Re: Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally failing for virtio PMD

It was also reported in 1559408 that this also affects BNX2X_PMD ** Description changed: *as a start same text as my reach for the involved project mailing lists* I was trying to replicate a setup that I have working on physical devices (ixgbe) under kvm since there is a virtio pmd

[Bug 1559912] Re: Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally failing for virtio PMD

ed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1559408] Re: Many PMD driver options are disabled, including "BNX2X"!

Since I consider the extra PMDs kind of "unsupported" upstream I have to rate it low for now. ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1559408] Re: Many PMD driver options are disabled, including "BNX2X"!

Hi Thiago, you were busy weren't you :-) Thanks your further experiments and reports - I'll try to refer all the open points. Trying to summarize: 1. The vfio grouping issue is not a bug, just the vfio setup being more complex in general. But you already handled that for your setup - great.

[Bug 1559408] Re: Many PMD driver options are disabled, including "BNX2X"!

As an example what I meant to imply here the reason why it is disabled by default as of now. commit ce9b8bb8b99877026fcca00fdb253fa3ec3a7e06 Author: Thomas Monjalon Date: Tue Jul 28 18:22:39 2015 +0200 config: disable bnx2x driver This driver has too

[Bug 1559912] Re: Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally failing for virtio PMD

** Also affects: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559912 Title: Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally

[Bug 1559981] Re: dpdk stability improvements by cherry picking from 16.04-rc1

Actually these might be good candidates to go to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/. Once my testing is done I should suggest that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

Ok, I did the backport. This package is somewhat scary old at some places (no patches, dh compatibility level 1 - well undefined). Yet I was able to keep changes minimal and the changes that went into the Debian upgrade from .33 to .34 applied as is. It is building fine in trusty. I revived my

[Bug 216847] Re: sshd will not start at boot if ListenAddress is set, because network interface is not yet up

Since so many things changed since this - admittedly embarrassing old - bug was reported I thought I retest it before the next LTS comes out. I looked at the Xenial content and found stuff like: Not only is it specified "After network.target", but on top there is

[Bug 1559981] [NEW] dpdk stability improvements by cherry picking from 16.04-rc1

at least some of them. ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: dpdk (

[Bug 1559912] Re: Openvswitch 2.5 + dpdk 2.2 totally failing for virtio PMD

Info on progress. No feedback from communities so far. After various other DPDK fixes took 3/4 of my day I set up a more thorough debugging environment derived from my testing env, but the real debugging itself has to start tomorrow morning. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1559408] Re: Many PMD driver options are disabled, including "BNX2X"!

Martin since I'm happy you work with that code base I'd recommend you create a test setup based on virtio. You will still be blocked on bug 1559912 for now, but I'm working on that this week and stil hope to get some upstream support. I'll reject this bug for the given reasons now, but please

[Bug 1559408] Re: Many PMD driver options are disabled, including "BNX2X"!

I checked the other default disabled drivers. To all some kind of incompleteness, non-support or being only stubs applies. It could be said, that the same is true for the virtual ones we enable like PCAP and XEN. But there is a major difference in: - nobody is "buying" the HW for pcap or XEN to

[Bug 1559981] Re: dpdk stability improvements by cherry picking from 16.04-rc1

I had a focus on identifying: - only patches to components that are enabled in our packaging - issues that have a real chance to occur on the usage we expect for 16.04 timeframe - patches that are small, so review is not overly complex - apply without manual adaption (offset ok to some extend, no

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

Subscribing the ~ubuntu-sru Team to evaluate and consider this for a Trusty SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204530 Title: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

** Patch added: "Debdiff for Trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1204530/+attachment/4608491/+files/bug-1204530-SRU-nis_3.17-32ubuntu6-to-nis_3.17-32ubuntu7.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1204530] Re: yppasswd results in a segmentation fault when run on clients or server

[Impact] * The bug is a segfault on yppasswd rendering users unable to change their passwords * justification for the SRU is the continued request by users and the fact that it is a very minimal change * the fix ensures that a lib accessing data unconditionally only gets called if the

[Bug 1557532] Re: dpdk fails to use 1G huge pages depending on the available mountpoints

ok, code is ready I wait a few days for something else to be wrapped up in one upload. *beta release hanging over me* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557532 Title:

[Bug 1512603] Re: nut-monitor systemd service is absent in nut-client package since Ubuntu vivid

Hi, in Xenial 2.7.2-4ubuntu1 got merged. The issue that our delta solved by dropping of the systemd service, seems solved in Debian >=2.7.2 The Debian Changelog part in 2.7.2-2 is: * Add wrappers that check the MODE in /etc/nut/nut.conf to avoid starting the daemons if nut is not

[Bug 1554009] [NEW] use after free and mem leak in lpm6

for the upstream discussion to finish and apply. Then we will pick and apply those as backport patches in packaging. ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Tria

[Bug 1554009] Re: use after free and mem leak in lpm6

One of the patches got an ack upstream, the other is still waiting for attention. None is committed yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554009 Title: use after free

[Bug 1554214] Re: Usege of vfio-pci module via /etc/dpdk/interfaces doesn't work

ged ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1546550] Re: openvswitch-switch-dpdk links against libdpdk statically

Yeah we changed the dpdk piece to properly be linkable in bug 1547517. And James did some great work on updating openvswitch to 2.5. We just have forgot to update this one, I'll talk to James later if he agrees that we can close it. Thanks already Thiago for making me aware! -- You received

[Bug 1554397] [NEW] dpdk-init fails due to missing modules in virt environments

instead of failing 3. add a comment about the need into /etc/dpdk/interfaces so people can read it while configuring instead when failing ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) St

[Bug 1546565] Re: Ownership/Permissions of vhost_user sockets for openvswitch-dpdk make them unusable by libvirt/qemu/kvm

Had a discussion with James Page today. He will look into it (backporting, hack, other solution) in his work regarding charming that stuff. Big thanks for that! We agreed that will discuss (or be happy about the fix) again in approx 10 days from now. ** Changed in: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1554397] Re: dpdk-init fails due to missing modules in virt environments

FYI how it looks like in the log, for the next that might find it. systemd[1]: Starting DPDK runtime environment... dpdk-init[7467]: Reassigning pci::00:04.0 to uio_pci_generic dpdk-init[7467]: Error - no supported modules(DPDK driver) are loaded systemd[1]: dpdk.service: Main process exited,

[Bug 1551601] Re: DPDK init scripts need some hardening against broken specifications in /etc/dpdk/interfaces

Found an uploader, wrapping two more fixes before that. Therefore removing the debdiff and sponsors subscription from this bug for now. ** Patch removed: "Updated revision of the debdiff"

[Bug 1546556] Re: Dropping privileges in openvswitch-switch via --user is incompatible with --dpdk

Hi Thiago, when running into the issue the bug is referring to it looked way different. So I'd say the issue you are currently facing has nothing to do with the bug. I've seen your mail on the List and will reply there with some suggestions and by that keep the bug to the related things. -- You

[Bug 1554214] Re: Usege of vfio-pci module via /etc/dpdk/interfaces doesn't work

The root cause is very easy - the "-" to "_" conversion in the scripts. I'll have to discuss why that was added as it is from before my time. I'll let you know about a solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in

[Bug 1554214] Re: Usege of vfio-pci module via /etc/dpdk/interfaces doesn't work

Hi - here a minor update Regarding: NOTE: To make it work manually, the module "vfio-pci" must be declared at "/etc/modules" as well. Yes it is required to load the module before dpdk_nic_bind, if running manually you have to do it some way on your own e.g. /etc/modules. If using the init

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

FYI - stalled on FCP setup in RT 89162 ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1551752] Re: DPDK Testpmd failing with Xen specific gntalloc in non-Xen environments

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551752 Title: DPDK Testpmd failing with Xen specific gntalloc in

[Bug 1551601] Re: DPDK init scripts need some hardening against broken specifications in /etc/dpdk/interfaces

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551601 Title: DPDK init scripts need some hardening against broken

[Bug 1551767] Re: DPDK hugepage config in /etc/dpdk/dpdk.conf should provide 1G pages as well

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551767 Title: DPDK hugepage config in /etc/dpdk/dpdk.conf should

[Bug 1546550] Re: openvswitch-switch-dpdk links against libdpdk statically

We looked at it and could confirm that the merge to OVS 2.5 and DPDK 2.2 resolved that bug without us noticing :-/ So mark it properly as fix released. ** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix

[Bug 1554397] Re: dpdk-init fails due to missing modules in virt environments

** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dpdk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554397 Title: dpdk-init fails due to missing modules in virt

  1   2   >