During a Dist upgrade Debian etch to Debian squeeze, I lost network
connectivity and power to the server ?*?sweating?*?
Thanks for this fix, here's what I had to do:
Post #24: Remove --skip-bdb ...(because the question to ask if you want
to keep the old file is the default)
and..
mysql_upgrade
I am running kubuntu karmic 64 bit with kvm. I am running Windows 7
Enterprise 64 bit and 32 bit as guests. Using virt-manager for
installation defaults to es1370 sound card and Multimedia Audio
Controller is detected. Also for both guest installs neither one finds
drivers after full activation
On 64 bit Windows 7 creative tech is not an option as a sound driver. So
far I can only make sound work on 32 bit. Also running 64 bit Windows 7
as a guest OS is slower than 32 bit Windows 7 guest and since I only
really need it for OCS communications I will just run 32 bit windows 7.
--
KVM and
Dang! this is not a little thing! How does one get some attention on this
issue? What does it take to get this bug fixed? Anyone? -
This has and is causing me countless hours.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
OK, so it appears that libnss-ldapd also works for me. (looks more like
RH anyway).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024475
Title:
libnss-ldap causes boot hang
On 14.04 pip --upgrade parsedatetime appears to work. Additionally
installing from sources with latest version works. Just make certain you
dont have old copies of the library laying around. Then actual route I
got to the fix involved removing the library from /usr/lib and
/usr/local/lib and then
libvirt deletes internal
snapshots from a running qemu.
Also, there are patches currently under review that are talking about
creating a QMP counterpart to the delvm monitor command.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
--
You
Thanks for fixing this! I'm looking forward to getting my printer
working. I assume that once the fix is released, I'll get it with the
standard apt-get update and apt-get upgrade operation?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Allowing MaaS to do it's own DHCP/DNS but isolating it onto its own
network segment and having nodes with two network interfaces (one
interface connected to the network segment the Maas controllers are on
and the second interface connected to another (different) network
Public bug reported:
The instances do not stop correctly. An error is triggered and the
instances are not removed from the DB and are still shown as ACTIVE
(even if the KVM processes and the network configuration are deleted
correctly ).
* Package used: nova 2011.3-0ubuntu5 (but the problem is
Yes, this happens every time on my installation.
- If I install Nova from ppa:nova-core/trunk I do not have the problem
(there is no console log fifo/ring).
- If I remove line 221 and line 222 in
/usr/share/pyshared/nova/virt/libvirt/connection.py-ubuntu:
---
def close(self):
I reinstalled all from scratch (Ubuntu Oneiric and Nova Diablo), and
indeed the bug was still there.
After applying your patch, the problem was solved!
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
I cannot attach a volume to an instance if both are on different hosts.
This is a problem which is specific to tgt which is used on Oneiric. I
file that bug in Nova (Ubuntu) and not in Nova (Openstack), even though
it is not an Ubuntu packaging problem.
Public bug reported:
When I start a standard Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric instance (ami-a7f539ce) on
Amazon EC2 I can ssh in just fine with the default .ssh/authorized_keys
file.
If I prefix the ssh key in .authorized_keys with the option no-pty
then attempts to ssh fail with the error:
PTY
This may also be a problem on non-EC2 Oneiric; I have no way of testing
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876168
Title:
EC2 Oneiric ssh no-pty triggers PTY
Closing as invalid. I wasn't testing correctly with a non-pty ssh.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876168
I do not see any difference between package 2011.3-0ubuntu6 and
2011.3-0ubuntu6.1 (oneiric-proposed). For me, it looks like the problem
is still there: nova-compute is still looking for lun-0 when it should
look for lun-1. lun-0 is reserved by tgt for the controler.
Bellow the three cases I have
** Description changed:
cloud-init sets up /etc/hosts with a default value for 127.0.1.1 looking
something like:
- 127.0.1.1 ip-10-202-61-233.ec2.internal ip-10-202-61-233
+ 127.0.1.1 ip-10-202-61-233.ec2.internal ip-10-202-61-233
I edit /etc/hosts to change this
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890501
Title:
EC2 cloud-init overwrites 127.0.1.1 in /etc/hosts on every reboot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
cloud-init sets up /etc/hosts with a default value for 127.0.1.1 looking
something like:
127.0.1.1 ip-10-202-61-233.ec2.internal ip-10-202-61-233
I edit /etc/hosts to change this value to something that makes more
sense to my internal software (e.g., Apache), say:
Scott: Learn something new every day. I will give this a try.
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890501
Title:
EC2 cloud-init overwrites 127.0.1.1 in
Scott: Your suggested approach works for me even though I can't find any
documentation on how this is supposed to work. Everything I read says
that 127.0.1.1 should be the canonical hostname of the instance. Do you
happen to have any pointers to the information you are alluding to with
IPv6 and
Public bug reported:
In bug #892554, Kees Cook (kees) makes a great suggestion that cloud-
init could output the public ssh host keys to the console output. This
could then be read by automated software outside of the instance and
added to a known_hosts file using the IP address and/or hostname
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893400
Title:
cloud-init: Output machine usable public ssh host key (for
known_hosts)
To manage notifications about this bug go
Love the known_hosts suitable output format idea! It doesn't even need
to be an option. Split that off into bug #893400.
The current ticket can remain for adding the ECDSA ssh key fingerprint.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
I've ammended the original example to use cat instead of cut as it
looks like the specific number of fields in the key may vary for some
older formats (rsa1) and it removes the objection that I invented
anything. I had been hoping to exclude the comment field, but agree
it's not worth the
** Description changed:
In bug #892554, Kees Cook (kees) makes a great suggestion that cloud-
init could output the public ssh host keys to the console output. This
could then be read by automated software outside of the instance and
added to a known_hosts file using the IP address
That isn't a solution. I realize that we are not paying for support,
but this sort of statement doesn't encourage me to suggest that route to
anyone. If the fix truly is to update to the newer version why can this
not be done in Onieric?
To anyone that this bug is affecting, make sure to click
Though I don't like the current way Oneiric manages /etc/hosts (and
submitted related bug #890501) I agree with Scott that it is how Oneiric
works on EC2 and changes could cause existing installations to break.
In fact, I have automated system code that works around the bug which
would break if
Public bug reported:
can you help fix this?
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-37.81-generic 2.6.32.49+drm33.21
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-37-generic x86_64
AptOrdering:
tftpd-hpa: Remove
sysstat: Install
sysstat:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913010
Title:
package tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-removal script returned error
+1 for cloudcontrol's recommendation to use CNAMEs. I've been
recommending this to Canonical since we were discussing the initial
setup of EC2 dedicated repositories. It would have avoided a couple
issues that have happened since and would help prevent future problems
as AWS releases new
Scott:
- With the CNAME solution, the requests still go to the internal IP
address for standard EC2 instances.
- I don't imagine that many non-EC2 people would try to configure their
Ubuntu systems to use the EC2 repositories.
- Canonical would get charged the same network fees for people
Blueprint changed by Eric Hammond:
Whiteboard changed:
- Ubuntu has packages for only two sets of AWS tools:
+ Ubuntu has packages for some AWS tools:
* EC2 API Tools [package: ec2-api-tools]
* EC2 AMI Tools [package: ec2-ami-tools]
* RDS - Relational Database Service [package
Blueprint changed by Eric Hammond:
Whiteboard changed:
Blueprint:https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-awstools
Etherpad: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-q-servercloud-awstools
-
- content below copied to Etherpad 2012-04-30, please make updates to
- etherpad
Public bug reported:
Everytime my email server (Ubuntu Server 12.04) receives an email sent
from google.com (e.g. gmail) using TLS with the RC4-MD5 cipher, it
fails. Here is the output of once such interaction.
I have set smtpd_tls_loglevel=2 in /etc/postfix/main.cf in hopes this
will help.
** Description changed:
Everytime my email server (Ubuntu Server 12.04) receives an email sent
from google.com (e.g. gmail) using TLS with the RC4-MD5 cipher, it
fails. Here is the output of once such interaction.
I have set smtpd_tls_loglevel=2 in /etc/postfix/main.cf in hopes this
This server has only been running a couple days. I initially performed
all my testing for emails sent from outside using gmail.com and it
seemd that my emails came through no problem.
I now see that google.com also uses cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA, and
messages received (by me) using this cipher do
Using self-signed certificate...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001040
Title:
TLS library problem drops incoming mail when sender uses RC4-MD5
cipher
To manage
Have circumvented the problem by adding smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers =
RC4-MD5 to my /etc/postfix/main.cf.
Google is now using RC4-SHA instead, and I've experienced no further
problems so far.
Obviously this may not be a postfix bug (it seems openssl-related issues
can even be cause by compiler
I explicitly made the changes in smtpd.conf as suggested in comment #34
and I still see the problem, I am back on 2.1.23. I have not upgraded
to Precise because this is still a problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Trying to get FOG working, it was suggested to install this package.
Setup terminated with error code 1. Here is the exact text from
terminal:
Get:1 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe atftpd i386
0.7.dfsg-11 [62.0 kB]
Fetched 62.0 kB in 0s (96.7 kB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010504
Title:
package tftpd-hpa 5.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-removal script returned error
@Otlay
I have that exact setup in my smtp.conf and updated cyrus-sasl packages
break for me with the original error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875440
Title:
@Otlay
After poking at the config file for some time I now get Jun 14 13:14:19
machine postfix/smtpd[15252]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Jun 14 13:14:19 machine postfix/smtpd[15252]: setting up TLS connection from
localhost[127.0.0.1]
Jun 14 13:14:19 machine postfix/smtpd[15252]:
I tried both flavors of sql_passwd and neither worked, I just gave up
and switched to dovecot for imap and sasl.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875440
Title:
- Reply message -
From: Carson Longhorn 875...@bugs.launchpad.net
To: emun...@mgebm.net
Subject: [Bug 875440] Re: Cannot authenticate with saslauthd and mysql
Date: Sat, Jun 23, 2012 01:21
The fix from Devin appears to have worked for me:
# cat /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf
Public bug reported:
The libkrb5 package in 12.04 looks like it's missing some functions.
That sounds weird, so let me explain:
I have the following packages installed:
$ dpkg-query -l 'libkrb*'
[snip]
ii libkrb5-26-heimdal1.6~git20120311.dfsg.1-2 Heimdal Kerberos -
libraries
ii
I think you mean region and not availability-zone since availability
zone names mean different things for different AWS accounts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
I am experiencing this problem in Ubuntu 12.04 Desktop (package:
tftpd-5.2-1ubuntu1). The tftpd daemon does not start when the computer
starts up, even though the tftpd-hpa job starts. As far as I can tell,
the problem is that the tftpd service is starting before the network is
properly
I am experiencing this problem with Samba 3.6.3 on Ubuntu 12.04. I've
attached a tarball containing some files that may be useful in
diagnosing the problem. They are:
- log.smbd for a SAMBA server session (debug level 5)
- log.127.0.0.1 for a session with the localhost where I mounted a
gdb backtrace (with debug symbols) attached.
The problem was easy to reproduce; I simply created a usershare (this
time from the command line, not Nautilus), mounted it from the localhost
from the command line, then unmounted it. The crash happens on the
unmount.
** Attachment added:
away. I
put debug statements in awstats.pl and $NotPageList{png} has the correct
value. Any hints of what type of debug statements I should add to figure
out this problem?
Eric Klien
It seems that setting LevelForFileTypesDetection to 2 (from 0) stops the
statistics from adding more .png hits
A solution to the problem is to change the following in awstats.pl:
if ($LevelForFileTypesDetection){
$datatoload{$filemime} = 1;
to:
# if ($LevelForFileTypesDetection)
{
version were installed
with MAAS, and the documentation link would point to that version,
stored locally.
Alternatively, http://maas.ubuntu.com/ could host docs for all supported
versions.
Thanks,
Eric
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: maas 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765275
Title:
metadata server cannot be contacted when deploying new instances on
EUC
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
## Issue
New instances deployed on EUC cannot contact the metadata server,
failing with Connection refused.
## Environment
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu Natty (development branch)
Release:11.04
Codename: natty
ii eucalyptus-admin-tools
Attaching a tcpdump of the following scenario:
- new instance is started
- it loops through the attempts to get the metadata via http
- the wget fails with connection refused
thanks,
eric
** Attachment added: out.pcap.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/765275
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Doing an update from 10 to 11 and a few things failed
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773872
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
filegen can generate the following files that do not appear to be
permitted by AppArmor (based solely on the above dialog): cryptostats,
protostats, rawstats, sysstats, and timingstats. (See ntp-doc,
Monitoring Commands.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
failed on upgrade to 11
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: slapd 2.4.23-6ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic-pae 2.6.38.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
AptOrdering:
slapd: Install
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781696
Title:
package slapd 2.4.23-6ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
new pre-removal script returned error exit status
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: backuppc
After upgrading from 3.1.0 to 3.2.0 as part of the Ubuntu server upgrade
from maverick to natty, none of my hosts were backing up, and all
(including localhost) were reporting no ping response. I followed all
instructions prior to upgrading, and
if I'm using it?
Thanks
Eric
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Chuck Short
chuck.sh...@canonical.comwrote:
So you are using ipv6?
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cloud-init
The EC2/UEC images currently allow users to ssh to root@ but do not give
the user shell access. Instead, a helpful message is displayed to the
user explaining they need to ssh to ubuntu@ and they are disconnected
after 10 seconds.
This is
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798505
Title:
Tighten permissions on root@ ssh with EC2/UEC images
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
DNS names like eu-west-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com (apt repository for eu-
west-1 on EC2) are currently resolving to private IP addresses (e.g.,
10.).
An EC2 instance running in VPC cannot access these repositories.
More details and possible fixes at:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824947
Title:
EC2 apt repository DNS resolution on VPC instances
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Amazon recommends fixing this through DNS instead of through software on
the instance.
Instead of resolving eu-west-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com directly to an A
record of the internal IP address starting with 10., Canonical should
change it to resolve to a CNAME of the external elastic IP address
Sorry, I should have been clear in the original bug report that I was
submitting it on behalf of Amazon and another customer and did not
experience it myself on that particular instance or AMI.
Also, I'm not sure that lack of a public IP address as described in
#615545 is sufficient to determine
We've experienced a similar problem with neither the CC nor the NCs
consistently discovering the public/private IP addresses of instances.
Here is how to reproduce our particular scenario:
It is in SYSTEM mode and a DHCP service is running on the CC. The DHCP can
assign IP addresses from many
Not sure if this is related but I'm also having issues with CIFS. I can
mount the storage just fine but sometimes if I try accessing the mounted
CIFS share my system locks. Also when I am able to access the CIFS
share in question I'm only able to see directories up to the letter S
anything
capturing the any information post lockup will not be possible. the
entire system freezes and requires a power cycle to recover.
The issue is defiantly a client issue. I've tested rolling my kernel
back to 2.6.24-19 from 2.6.27-7 and everything works fine.
Could you point me to the pair of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 512096 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512096
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: python-cinderclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-cinderclient
Assignee: (unassigned) = ChrisBuccella (chris-buccella)
** Changed in: python-cinderclient
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 13.10
Release:13.10
mysql-server-5.5:
Installed: 5.5.35-0ubuntu0.13.10.1
Candidate: 5.5.35-0ubuntu0.13.10.1
Version table:
*** 5.5.35-0ubuntu0.13.10.1 0
500 http://us-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy-updates/main
Got bit by this, too; however, in my case it's adding ldap to the
hosts line that got me into trouble.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024475
Title:
libnss-ldap
EBS volumes and snapshots create this sort of problem regularly for me,
generally with conflicting duplicate XFS UIDs which I have to override.
The best solution for EC2 AMIs may be to always accept that /dev/sda1 is
the boot disk.
--
attaching a volume to maverick instance may boot off it
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cloud-init
Attempting to log in to the root user on an Ubuntu AMI returns the
message:
Please login as the ubuntu user rather than root user.
This has two minor problems:
1. There is a missing the before the word root.
2. Adding quotes around the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 651370 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651370
Confirmed with my AWS account using same AMI in eu-west-1 and
m2.2xlarge. Console log attached.
** Changed in: ec2-api-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Attachment added: console.log
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 651370 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651370
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 651370
ec2 kernel crash invalid opcode [#1]
* You can subscribe to bug 651370 by following this link:
I can confirm that the openldap package from ppa:ssalley fixes likewise
on maverick. Looks like the other openldap update is almost in -updates.
Hopefully we can get this one in there ASAP.
--
Existing patch gssapi.diff makes guess_service_principal produce garbage
Could the fix be backported to Lucid?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602060
Title:
Virtio network stops working after dynamic virtio disk attachment
--
I would like to see a solution like the following for this and other
files generated at startup (e.g., apt sources):
If the user has not modified the file since it was created from a
template, then the system should feel free to continue maintaining that
file by regenerating it from the template
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726973
Title:
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
Public bug reported:
libvirt-bin cannot access files in / due to being denied access by
apparmor. You have to add ' / r,' to /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd
for the access.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: libvirt-bin 0.8.3-1ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727286
Title:
apparmor is blocking libvirt-bin from accessing folders in /
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
In my experience in 2008-2009, just because networking is up on an EC2
instance does not mean that 169.254.169.254 is going to accept
connections and requests for meta-data and user-data. You need to wait
for this to become available. I had code to do this in Ubuntu AMIs I
built back then.
On second glance, cloud-init may actually be retrying the connection and
the problem is that sometimes it takes longer than the current number of
retries.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ec2-ami-tools
The package ec2-ami-tools is outdated on Hardy, Intrepid, Jaunty,
Karmic. This prevents the usage of the latest EC2 features.
** Affects: ec2-ami-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Updgrade ec2-ami-tools
** Changed in: vmbuilder
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
vmbuilder EC2: Retry ec2-upload-bundle on failures
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287860
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: vmbuilder
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
Add ability to build Debian virtual machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235562
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.
--
** Also affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: vmbuilder
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Allow multiple exec scripts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289998
You received this
Public bug reported:
It is fairly standard practice to include kernel modules in images for
Amazon EC2, but the most recent Karmic AMIs do not include them:
ami-a40fefcd
canonical-alphas-us/karmic-i386-alpha5.1.manifest.xml
ami-a20fefcb
there presumably aren't very many modules for the EC2 kernel.
I guess this raises the questions of what modules we are talking about,
and this is an area where I wouldn't know what to cut out. I personally
depend on some which may not be considered part of the core modules
including: fuse, xfs,
** Changed in: vmbuilder
Status: New = Invalid
--
Karmic i386 EC2 kernel emulating unsupported memory accesses
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.
--
Are we sure that group admin should have sudo rights by default in
Karmic? It doesn't in Jaunty.
When this bug was submitted, the AMI in question had a comment in
/etc/sudoers which claimed that admin should have sudo privs, but the
actual line to implement this was missing.
The latest Alpha-6
Upon further review, I stand corrected and the bug stands.
--
Sudoers file is misconfigured in AMI ami-5059be39
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423497
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.
--
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
