[Bug 214476] Re: open-iscsi fails to install

2008-05-06 Thread Jesper Krogh
But ubuntu4 hasn't been uploaded to hardy.. so the bug is still present in hardy (just hit it) Jesper -- open-iscsi fails to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in

[Bug 214476] Re: open-iscsi fails to install

2008-05-06 Thread Jesper Krogh
But ubuntu4 hasn't been uploaded to hardy.. so the bug is still present in hardy (just hit it) Jesper -- open-iscsi fails to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in

[Bug 291070] [NEW] snmp crash at bootup

2008-10-30 Thread Jesper Krogh
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Hardy amd64 with all patches. Sometimes when snmpd starts it dies with: [ 374.996791] snmpd[8897] trap divide error rip:7ffd4be9dc2c rsp:7fff54832550 error:0 Other times it is: [5631127.259786] snmpd[27035]: segfault at 7f5160145000 ip 7f51600ded00 sp 7fff68d3d2d8

[Bug 28380] Re: Autofs fails to update /net with new shares from server

2010-02-08 Thread Jesper Krogh
It is really dissapointing .. but there has been posted an awfull lot of automated crap in this bug, by people who either: * Didnt read the initial bug or * Did try out the steps to reproduce Even though it can be done on any installation, just going ahead using the five points above. The

[Bug 28380] Re: Autofs fails to update /net with new shares from server

2010-04-12 Thread Jesper Krogh
Hi Dave Thank you for finally attending to the bug. Well since the problem now persists in all official releases of Ubuntu as of now, allthough fixed in the current development branch, dont you think it is a bit premature to close the bug. Even as invalid since fixed is what you actually are

[Bug 571572] [NEW] krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets.

2010-04-29 Thread Jesper Krogh
Public bug reported: I'm trying to upgrade workstations to lucid an fails to access our kerberos enabled websites. It reveals that the krb5 implementation in lucid now tries to resolve the reverse dns and aquire a tikket for service/reverse dns instead of service/what the user typed in the first

[Bug 571572] Re: krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets.

2010-04-29 Thread Jesper Krogh
Since the problem is in the clientside kerberos libraries it affects all kerberos enabled stuff. -- krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 571572] Re: krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets.

2010-04-29 Thread Jesper Krogh
Tried.. had that before.. but doesn't work any more. (and isn't documented in man krb5.conf either). -- krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 571572] Re: krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets.

2010-04-29 Thread Jesper Krogh
Hi Sam. I agree.. the current behaviors seems to be excactly what is in the code and in the documentation. Never the less it is a change from earlier versions of Ubuntu and a change that makes Ubuntu + Firefox work in a different way than MS Windows + MSIE (negoiating different tickets), thus

[Bug 571572] Re: krb5 prefers the reverse pointer no matter what for locating service tickets.

2010-04-29 Thread Jesper Krogh
I agree that it is a partial workaround.. it fixes the Ubuntu/Firefox + apache combination. But without changing the same thing for all the IIS servers it would still render my Ubuntu/Firefox + IIS SSO broken. Since I only administrate the Linux stuff, and the other side genereally are very