** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Quantal)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.1 = None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640
Title:
status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-12.04.1
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Confirmed
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Quantal)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Oneiric)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640
Title:
status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code
To manage
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640
Title:
status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code
To manage notifications
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Lucid)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640
Title:
status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code
To manage
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Natty)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640
Title:
status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code
To manage
** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
This seems like an important bug to fix, but I have reservations about
changing dnsmasq's behaviour in a stable update. When you say ‘most
installations don't use this type of networking’, what do you mean by
‘most’, is it plausible that someone has relied on this behaviour, and
if someone had
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libvirt (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in
The proposed package (specifically the postrm) breaks Policy - you're
unconditionally removing a conffile on upgrade/removal/etc which will
destroy any user changes.
Additionally, I'd like to know what the likely impact of adding bind-
interfaces to dnsmasq is on users. What (if anything) will
** Changed in: oem-priority/quantal
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974450
Title:
irqbalance classifies network interfaces with
** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04 = ubuntu-12.10
** Also affects: irqbalance (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Medium
Status: New
** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Well, what I meant was: the code that you're touching is in the dnsmasq-
base package, and dnsmasq-base is installed on *all* Ubuntu systems, as
a dependency of network-manager. It seems that the worst-case regression
potential is that we break DNS on all Ubuntu systems, which would be bad
:)
lxc
Hello Clint, or anyone else affected,
Accepted juju into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju/0.5+bzr531-0ubuntu1.2 in a few
hours and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing
this new package. See
Hello Simon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted vm-builder into lucid-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vm-
builder/0.12.4-0ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Grrr. The lucid-proposed upload has a bunch of unnecessary diff in the
.po files. It's all no-impact, though - ordering changes in the headers,
and slightly different word-wrap in some strings.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Tags removed:
Hello dallaswv, or anyone else affected,
Accepted samba into lucid-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:3.4.7~dfsg-
1ubuntu3.11 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Serge, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/0.9.8-2ubuntu17.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Louis-Dominique, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/0.9.8-2ubuntu17.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
No change backport. This is slightly different than what backportpackage
came up with because I did need to change the version string from
5.0.17~oneiric1 to 5.0.17ubuntu1~oneiric1. This works now because the
maintainer added the simple patch to correctly detect version backport
strings.
** Patch
** Description changed:
-
- Please backport whois 5.0.15ubuntu2 (main) from precise
+ Please backport whois 5.0.17 (main) from quantal
Description:
- Please backport whois 5.0.15ubuntu2 (main) from precise to oneiric.
+ Please backport whois 5.0.17 (main) from quantal to oneiric.
Hello Yoann, or anyone else affected,
Accepted vm-builder into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vm-
builder/0.12.4+bzr477-0ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Tokuko, or anyone else affected,
Accepted vm-builder into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vm-
builder/0.12.4+bzr477-0ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
So we can't backport because of the version string check in
debian/rules. I proposed just removing it entirely in debian here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684526
If this gets fixed, then backporting will be possible.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #684526
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Affects: quota (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Chris J Arges (christopherarges)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: quota (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Chris J Arges (christopherarges)
Status
There is already a debian bug here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685356
I've attached a patch based on the suggestion there, and can confirm this does
fix the issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=16;filename=quota_4.00-4ubuntu1.debdiff;att=1;bug=685356
**
** Also affects: whois via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684526
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regression
Sent a new patch to debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
Title:
whois doesn't properly query .hr/.sx/.pe TLDs and incorrect format for
whois.arin.net
To
This is fixed in quota 4.01-1. I will backport the changes for
precise/quantal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044516
Title:
repquota not working correctly with xfs
** Patch added: quota_precise_lp1044516.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1044516/+attachment/3320950/+files/quota_precise_lp1044516.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in
** Patch added: quota_quantal_lp1044516.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1044516/+attachment/3320951/+files/quota_quantal_lp1044516.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+ [IMPACT]
+ * When using quota on systems with XFS on precise/quantal only the root
quota is reported.
+
+ [TESTCASE]
+ * See bug below.
+
+ [Regression Potential]
+ * This patch is already part of quota 4.01-1. It would be important to test
** Also affects: quota (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Formatted Steve's patch into a debdiff for precise. This builds on my
machine.
** Patch added: quota_lp973663_precise_fix.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/973663/+attachment/3324032/+files/quota_lp973663_precise_fix.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification
Looks like this also affects quantal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973663
Title:
quota returns nothing for NFS on 12.04
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (christopherarges)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973663
Title:
quota returns
** Patch added: quota_precise_lp1044516_v2.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1044516/+attachment/3325530/+files/quota_precise_lp1044516_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in
** Patch added: quota_quantal_lp1044516_v2.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1044516/+attachment/3325531/+files/quota_quantal_lp1044516_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in
There ya go.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044516
Title:
repquota not working correctly with xfs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (christopherarges)
** Patch added: quota_lp973663_quantal_fix.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/973663/+attachment/3325553/+files/quota_lp973663_quantal_fix.debdiff
--
You received this bug
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+ [IMPACT]
+ * The latest quota does not return any values for NFS mounts. This was
working properly in 10.04 and as broken in 12.04 and 12.10.
+
+ [TESTCASE]
+ * Setup an NFS mount. Install quota. Run quota and observe the output.
Example given
Hello dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openvswitch into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/1.4.0-1ubuntu1.3 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: quota (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu.
This now cleanly backports to oneiric from quantal.
Using:
backportpackage -s quantal -d oneiric -B pbuilder-dist -b whois -w .
** Description changed:
- Please backport whois 5.0.17 (main) from quantal
+ Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
Description:
- Please backport
** Description changed:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
Description:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal to oneiric.
Reason for the backport:
This provides some needed updates to users who need to query .hr/.sx/.pe
TLDs,
** Description changed:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
Description:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal to oneiric.
Reason for the backport:
This provides some needed updates to users who need to query .hr/.sx/.pe
TLDs,
Ok backports cleanly to Precise as well. Did the tests, attached the
requestbackport output to the description. Thanks
** Description changed:
+ Summary (one line):
+ Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
+
+ Description:
+ Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal to precise.
FWIW: Build is here: https://launchpad.net/~christopherarges/+archive
/ppa-test/+sourcepub/2698908/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
Title:
Blueprint changed by Chris J Arges:
Whiteboard changed:
User Stories:
Risks:
Test Plans:
Release Note:
+
+
+ [louis_bouchard] - kdump-tools needs to be MIR / file a bug: TODO
+ [smb] - discuss linuxcrashdump changes on ubuntu-devel / ubuntu-kernel: TODO
+ [smb] - linuxcrashdump
Blueprint changed by Chris J Arges:
Work items changed:
Work items:
Integrate netdump support: TODO
netdump charm to aggregate dumps in a cloud: TODO
+ [louis-bouchard] - kdump-tools needs to be MIR / file a bug: TODO
+ [smb] - discuss linuxcrashdump changes on ubuntu-devel / ubuntu-kernel
Blueprint changed by Chris J Arges:
Work items changed:
Work items:
- Integrate netdump support: TODO
- netdump charm to aggregate dumps in a cloud: TODO
[louis-bouchard] - kdump-tools needs to be MIR / file a bug: TODO
[smb] - discuss linuxcrashdump changes on ubuntu-devel / ubuntu-kernel
Blueprint changed by Chris J Arges:
Whiteboard changed:
User Stories:
Risks:
Test Plans:
Release Note:
+ --
- [louis_bouchard] - kdump-tools needs to be MIR / file a bug: TODO
- [smb] - discuss linuxcrashdump changes on ubuntu-devel / ubuntu-kernel: TODO
- [smb
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard)
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regression
.
Problem Description:
whois in oneiric can't query .hr/.sx/.pe TLDs. In addition the query format
for ARIN is different than in precise.
Version affected:
Current Oneiric Version: 5.0.11ubuntu2
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges
At this point, I've already requested a backport in October, so I can copy and
paste that again.
However, I spoke with infinity about this bug yesterday and he recommended an
SRU, which is why I created that patch.
While I said the patch 'enables' these features, it really fixes the legitimate
Neither do I. The security packages do not contain a build-dep on
parted. Marking the Lucid, Maverick and Natty tasks back to incomplete.
I note that you've got another SRU upload for bug #495394 in the queue.
Would you like to fold this change into that upload, or process them
separately?
**
Before accepting this upload I'd like to check that you don't want to
fold the missing fixes for bug #697046 into this upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495394
Serge - why do you think this can't be SRU'd? It's already been
accepted into lucid-proposed once, then verified, and the only reason
it's not in lucid-updates is that it got superseded by a security upload
before the 7-day testing period had elapsed.
If you made a new upload to lucid-proposed
Hello gdahlman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello exe, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
**
Hello ryokenau, or anyone else affected,
Accepted squid into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
Hello Ernst, or anyone else affected,
Accepted squid into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
**
Hello Craig, or anyone else affected,
Accepted multipath-tools into lucid-proposed, the package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello Craig, or anyone else affected,
Accepted multipath-tools into maverick-proposed, the package will build
now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello ryokenau, or anyone else affected,
Accepted squid into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello Ernst, or anyone else affected,
Accepted squid into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
What version of libssl0.9.8 do you have installed? If older than 0.9.8e-
5ubuntu3.2 (such as if you have 0.9.8e-5ubuntu3) you will continue to
generate bad keys. This is irrespective of what version of openssh-
server you have, which only adds checks for vulnerable keys, and does
not affect key
First, because you have a custom non-gutsy libssl0.9.8, I think this
establishes the non-bugness of this report. I would suggest to the owner
of this bug ticket that this be turned into a help request instead.
In response to the rest of the message: the 5ubuntu3.1 version no longer
exists in the
Public bug reported:
open-vm-tools-2013.04.16-1098359 dkms module does not build on linux-3.11.
It will be important this works on 3.11 since Saucy will be rebased on 3.11
eventually.
The following errors occur:
1)
open-vm-tools-2013.04.16-1098359/modules/linux/vmhgfs/file.c: In function
Reported on sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/p/open-vm-
tools/tracker/175/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to open-vm-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208011
Title:
open-vm-tools-2013.04.16-1098359
Hi. This is not a duplicate of bug 1194940. Essentially we need to make
sure open-vm-tools works with 3.11 and there is an additional bug
introduced because of 'readdir' transitioning to 'iterate'. So both are
issues for 3.11, and the other bug just affects 3.10.
** This bug is no longer a
Thanks Kapil -- Is this destined for the ppa as well or are you after
verification first?
--chris
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070519
Title:
zookeeper: WARN
** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: keepalived (Ubuntu Raring)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug
It works!
Email address
[]
Password
[]
Thanks.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to w3m in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (arges)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100843
Title:
Live Migration Causes
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100843
Title:
Live Migration Causes Performance Issues
To
: High
Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (arges)
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (arges)
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Raring
I can achieve a similar hung task by using the following script:
#!/bin/bash -x
NUM=7999
for (( i=0; i${NUM}; i++ ))
do
ip netns add foobar$i
done
for (( i=0; i${NUM}; i++ ))
do
ip netns delete foobar$i
done
for (( i=0; i${NUM}; i++ ))
do
ip netns add foobar$i
done
for (( i=0; i${NUM};
I found that two patches need to be backported to solve this issue:
ad0b5321f1f797274603ebbe20108b0750baee94
211ea74022f51164a7729030b28eec90b6c99a08
I've added the necessary bits into precise and tried a few tests:
1) Measure performance before and after savevm/loadvm.
2) Measure performance
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification
+ [Impact]
+ * Users of QEMU that save their memory states using savevm/loadvm or migrate
experience worse performance after the migration/loadvm. To workaround these
issues VMs must be completely rebooted. Optimally we should be able to restore
a
** Description changed:
SRU Justification
- [Impact]
- * Users of QEMU that save their memory states using savevm/loadvm or migrate
experience worse performance after the migration/loadvm. To workaround these
issues VMs must be completely rebooted. Optimally we should be able to restore
a
** Description changed:
SRU Justification
[Impact]
* Users of QEMU that save their memory states using savevm/loadvm or migrate
experience worse performance after the migration/loadvm. To workaround these
issues VMs must be completely rebooted. Optimally we should be able to restore
a
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regression
I have verified this on my local machine using virt-manager's save
memory, savevm/loadvm via the qemu monitor , and migrate via qemu
monitor.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Raring)
Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Bug to track above issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1262692
I am not 100% sure its a kernel or openvswitch dkms issue. I've
installed OVS- 1.10 with the affected kernel version and it works fine.
So perhaps there is a patch somewhere for OVS 1.4.6 that will fix
: 1600 R11: 0246 R12: 8155ea62
R13: 880079921f78 R14: 7fff3cfcd910 R15: 0002
ORIG_RAX: 002e CS: 0033 SS: 002b
** Affects: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges)
Status: In Progress
** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-failed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219788
Title:
[SRU] Update openvswitch to 1.4.6 stable
I need to find if the problem is with linux or openvswitch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1262692
Title:
oops using openvswitch 1.4.6 with 3.5 series kernel
-nagging
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (arges)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
Ok so the problem is that Linux changed the prototype of
ip_select_indent. We can fix this on the ovs side using the following:
diff --git a/datapath/tunnel.c b/datapath/tunnel.c
index 1ebbc77..d62e1ea 100644
--- a/datapath/tunnel.c
+++ b/datapath/tunnel.c
@@ -1294,8 +1294,14 @@ int
This commit is present in the latest 3.2/3.5 kernels for Ubuntu,
therefore I'll ifdef it for 3,2,0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1262692
Title:
oops using
@james-page
I'm tracking the fix in bug 1262692. Essentially the kernel function
ip_select_ident has changed prototypes with a stable patch applied to 3.2 /
3.5. I'm creating a patch that will ifdef this change in ovs and allow the test
to work. Therefore this isn't a kernel bug, its an ABI
) = Chris J Arges (arges)
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Quantal)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris J Arges (arges)
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: openvswitch
** Patch added: fix_lp1262692_quantal.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1262692/+attachment/3943818/+files/fix_lp1262692_quantal.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch
Debdiffs posted in bug above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219788
Title:
[SRU] Update openvswitch to 1.4.6 stable release
To manage notifications about this
Fixes pushed for P/Q.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1262692
Title:
oops using openvswitch gre tunnels with upstream commit 703133de in
kernel
To manage
601 - 700 of 1779 matches
Mail list logo
