Public bug reported:
After enabling precise-updates for universe, krb5-user is not
installable. It depends on libkrb5-3 = 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 but
there is no such version in the repositories.
precise# apt-cache policy krb5-user
krb5-user:
Installed: (none)
Candidate:
I imagine this may be a duplicate of bug #1100177 but it was rather
messy so I opted to create a new bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177
Title:
Turns out the problem was that I lacked the precise-updates repo for
main.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
Is this a duplicate of bug #1100177?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039598
Title:
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
To manage notifications about this bug
Additionally, the message from the old server is misleading.
precise$ whois devunt.kr | less
...
ECU+0083U+0081湲B0 ECA0U+0095蹂대U+008AU+0094 UTF-8 EC
U+009D몄BDU+0094EBU+0094⑸U+0090U+0098ECU+0096B4
ECU+0084U+009C鍮U+0084ECU+008AㅻU+0090U+0098怨A0
ECU+009EU+0088EC
U+008A듬U+008BU+0088EBU+008BA4.
(iconv tells me it cannot convert from EUC-KR to UTF-8 from the old
input so I'm not sure if that's actually true, but the domain should be
set up to use the new, well-defined server anyway.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Upstream 5.0.23 fixed this issue. There is no separate upstream bug
report.
http://ftp-
master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/w/whois/unstable_changelog
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba-common
The directory /etc/samba contains a spurious file gdbcommands which does
not appear to be documented. To the extent that I am able to guess what
it's for, it should probably simply be removed, or else documented e.g.
in the
I'm taking the liberty to set this to Incomplete as the question from
2007 about whether this is still a problem has gone unanswered.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Incomplete
--
Printing does not work: PID 23402 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/smb) crashed on signal
6
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Incorrect hyperlink in samba-docs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
I spent a lot of time investigating this, and would have avoided that if
it had been documented. I'd still like to request the addition of a
small snippet to README.Debian but since I'm an Ubuntu user I didn't
want to take this directly upstream. If I submit this upstream, with a
small patch,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: whois
I'm speculating the Connection refused means the server name in whois
is wrong. There is a whois server at whois.aeda.net.ae which appears
authoritative. They offer a web lookup at http://whois.aeda.net.ae/ as
well.
ubu...@ubuntu$ whois
12 matches
Mail list logo