[Bug 1158141] Re: apache2 forward proxy socket read error

2015-10-08 Thread AlainKnaff
Same problem here. Works fine with 1.9.0+svn250-3 Broken with 1.9.0+svn250-5 (Package for vivid, installed on a trusty) Btw, Robie, if you snub one user, in reality you also snub hundreds of others who find his bug report by googling for the same symptoms, so please be a bit more helpful. It

[Bug 1158141] Re: apache2 forward proxy socket read error

2015-10-08 Thread AlainKnaff
Found it. Actually it was due to both a pecularity in the proxy server I wanted to get through, and a bug in how proxytunnel sets SNI. It seems that our proxy server ignores SNI in SSLv3, but considers it in TLSv1. And proxytunnel sets the wrong SNI. proxytunnel ---> proxy1 (the one I want to

[Bug 1394764] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2014-11-20 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: The problem occured while upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-32.51~lucid1-server 3.0.69 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-32-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Nov 20

[Bug 1394764] Re: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2014-11-20 Thread AlainKnaff
I'd gladly try to manually install this cyrus-sasl2 2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1 , but where can I find it? Any other idea how to look for this configuration issue? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-10-15 Thread AlainKnaff
Since I disabled smbpasswd-migrate, I now get the following in my auth.log Oct 15 09:45:28 crmm vsftpd: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so): libgpg-error.so.0: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory Oct 15 09:45:28 crmm vsftpd: PAM adding faulty module:

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-10-13 Thread AlainKnaff
Clarification: smbpasswd-migrate not winbind After disabling this in /usr/share/pam-configs/smbpasswd-migrate, it does indeed work now. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.

[Bug 375569] Re: gnome-screensaver failure - can't access samba password database - not running as root

2011-10-13 Thread AlainKnaff
The thing is, this isn't really a bug at all. gnome-screensaver is working exactly as it's supposed to, as is pam_smbpass; it just logs (at severity LOG_DEBUG) a notice that the smbpasswd database is not being updated, because the process isn't running as root. The issue is that this is

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-09-02 Thread AlainKnaff
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831907 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831907 This bug was (accidentally?) marked as a duplicate of an unrelated bug (certificates, whereas this one is about anonymous ftp). How can we undo this? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-07-06 Thread AlainKnaff
Re-tested on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS, vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6.2 == Bug still present ** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu.

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-05-02 Thread AlainKnaff
The problem with pam_shells and local_enable+anonymous_enable occurs when starting vsftpd via 'service vsftpd start'. The only reason why I mentioned starting it manually at all was because that is what I did to more precisely trace the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-02-26 Thread AlainKnaff
** Attachment added: auth.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/723603/+attachment/1872452/+files/auth.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723603

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-02-26 Thread AlainKnaff
** Attachment added: vsftpd.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/723603/+attachment/1872453/+files/vsftpd.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-02-26 Thread AlainKnaff
It seems to complain about pam_shells. And indeed, after commenting this out, the problem goes away, even with both anonymous_enable and local_enable set to YES. The problem becomes different when starting vsftpd from the command line instead of using service vsftpd start: # ftp localhost

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-02-24 Thread AlainKnaff
** Attachment added: vsftpd.conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/723603/+attachment/1869629/+files/vsftpd.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.

[Bug 723603] [NEW] vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-02-23 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vsftpd In 10.04, it is no longer possible to set up vsftpd in such a way that it allows both anonymous and identified logins. If you set the following in your vsftpd.conf, local users cannot login. In older versions, this was still possible.

[Bug 723603] Re: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable

2011-02-23 Thread AlainKnaff
Indeed. Sorry for the confusion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723603 Title: vsftpd no longer supports both anonymous_enable and local_enable -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 685590] Re: dovecot 1.2.9 not compatible with thunderbird

2011-01-31 Thread AlainKnaff
Ooops... actually, what seemed to have happened is that after adding lucid-proposed to /etc/apt/sources.list, I had accidentally left our own private repository in as well (lll), so all I did was just re-adding our own private version... Sorry for that confusion. That being said, is there an

[Bug 685590] Re: dovecot 1.2.9 not compatible with thunderbird

2011-01-30 Thread AlainKnaff
I ended up manually de-installing our locally made dovecot package (also numbered 1.2.12), and then everything worked fine. The version from proposed works as expected, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot

[Bug 687535] [NEW] upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh

2010-12-08 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: When sshd gets a signal 1 for reload, it forks a new process and ditches the old. This causes upstart to believe that ssh has crashed, and loses track of it. A second reload (or any other initctl operation on ssh) will thus say: reload: Unknown instance: There would be 2

[Bug 687535] Re: upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh

2010-12-08 Thread AlainKnaff
So why bother having an upstart or init at all, and not start and stop everything manually? Similar issue exists with squid (bug 573853) Upstart is a nice concept, and really improved boot times. It would even be better if it was more reliable. These glitches break web administration tools

[Bug 685590] Re: dovecot 1.2.9 not compatible with thunderbird

2010-12-08 Thread AlainKnaff
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685590 Title: dovecot 1.2.9 not compatible with thunderbird --

[Bug 685201] Re: shutdown_lifetime setting behavior does not match doc

2010-12-08 Thread AlainKnaff
** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685201 Title: shutdown_lifetime setting behavior does not match doc

[Bug 687535] Re: upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh

2010-12-08 Thread AlainKnaff
Alain, I understand your frustration. think a little more serious than Low, Thanks for your insight. as existence of a workaround only barely mitigates the impact of this. Just a note about this workaround: kill -9 `pidof sshd` will saw off the branch on which you're sitting if you happen to

[Bug 685590] Re: dovecot 1.2.9 not compatible with thunderbird

2010-12-06 Thread AlainKnaff
Yes, it is reproducible: just connect to dovecot with thunderbird imap. We use Maildir. The bug occurs even for new users. In case I wasn't clear: this is a show stopper bug, which prevents the most popular client from connecting to dovecot, and as such is of high importance. Well, people could

[Bug 685201] Re: shutdown_lifetime setting behavior does not match doc

2010-12-06 Thread AlainKnaff
2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685201 Title: shutdown_lifetime setting behavior does not match doc -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 685590] [NEW] dovecot 1.2.9 not compatible with thunderbird

2010-12-05 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: Lucid (LTS) ships with dovecot 1.2.9 by default. When a user attempts to log in to dovecot using thunderbird, the following is logged, and thunderbird doesn't manage to get folder contents: Dec 5 19:26:43 hal dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=aknaff, method=PLAIN,

[Bug 573853] Re: Cannot control squid Unknown instance

2010-12-04 Thread AlainKnaff
It seems that what is happening is that squid forks twice to demonize, but the middle process forgets to exit, and keeps hanging around. # ps auxww | fgrep squid root 2593 0.0 0.1 31792 4884 ?S01:27 0:03 /usr/bin/perl /usr/sbin/squid-prefetch root 14719 0.0 0.0

[Bug 573853] Re: Cannot control squid Unknown instance

2010-12-04 Thread AlainKnaff
Not adding -N, but instead replacing expect fork with expect daemon does not work as upstart will wait for the middle process to exit, which it never does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

[Bug 685201] [NEW] shutdown_lifetime setting behavior does not match doc

2010-12-04 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid When shutting down squid, squid waits for 30 seconds (shutdown_lifetime setting) even if no active client is present, however, the doc says it would. Moreover the doc says that this also applies to SIGHUP, but (fortunately...) it doesn't.

[Bug 514883] Re: dialog-based applications seem sluggish

2010-11-27 Thread AlainKnaff
Still an issue in 10.04.1 -- dialog-based applications seem sluggish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread AlainKnaff
Seconded. Please provide a backport to lucid! -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. --

[Bug 675052] [NEW] Upgrade from hardy (8.04) to lucid (10.04) sets bad permissions on olcDatabase={-1}frontend, cn=config

2010-11-13 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: When upgrading from hardy to lucid, the following permissions are set on the frontend : # {-1}frontend, config dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config olcAccess: {0}to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external ,cn=auth manage by * break instead of: dn:

[Bug 370271] Re: During dist upgrade from 8.10 to 9.04 with mailman got exit status 1

2010-11-02 Thread AlainKnaff
Chuck, the comment you replied to didn't really confirm that the problem was solved. More to the contrary, the problem still exists, and even was so bad that Craig gave up on it and decided to just wait for the next version... ... which eventually turned out to be as broken as 9.04 because

[Bug 666625] [NEW] slapd no longer installs default database since 10.04

2010-10-26 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: Up to 9.04, slapd's postinstall script installed a default LDAP database (with a DN derived from the server's hostname) if none was present already. Since 10.04, it only installs the cn=config space, but no user data. Moreover, there is no utility present to do this easily

[Bug 554928] Re: cannot follow symlinks on any samba share

2010-05-10 Thread AlainKnaff
Just a remark for those gotten bitten by this behavior, and want to avoid similar occurrences in the future: The samba team doesn't read distribution's bug trackers, but they do have their own list: samba-techni...@lists.samba.org The samba team lives under the impression that only a tiny

[Bug 563752] [NEW] 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.11 has new unix extensions parameter default to yes, wreaking havoc on existing configs

2010-04-15 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.11 has a new unix extensions parameter default to yes, wreaking havoc on existing configs by disabling wide links In order to respect principle of least surprise, any new parameters which can break existing config should default

[Bug 563752] Re: 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.11 has new unix extensions parameter default to yes, wreaking havoc on existing configs

2010-04-15 Thread AlainKnaff
Thinking about this somewhat more, several other solutions to the problem may be considered: 1. If wide links = yes and unix extensions = yes are both present on a share, do it the other way round: disable unix extensions rather than wide links. 2. Even better: _only_ disable the call to make

[Bug 514883] Re: dialog-based applications seem sluggish

2010-03-07 Thread AlainKnaff
I just tried it (with a 9.04 image), it doesn't help. -- dialog-based applications seem sluggish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 514883] Re: dialog-based applications seem sluggish

2010-01-31 Thread AlainKnaff
The problem also exists for bash commandline. Cursor keys are handled with a one-second delay (approx.), whereas other keys are handled immediately. My previous interpretation was apparently wrong: the problem is not related to any output that the program performs in reaction to receiving the

[Bug 514883] [NEW] dialog-based applications seem sluggish

2010-01-30 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kvm When running a dialog-based application (such as Ubuntu's text mode installer) within kvm, it feels very sluggish. If I press cursor-down or up, it takes more than a second until the highlighted bar moves up or down. Typing text in a (dialog) text