Re: [Bug 970679] Re: winbind coredumps when encountering a group with over 1000 members
Quoting Seb Harrington (970...@bugs.launchpad.net): With this confirmed and the patch confirmed as fixing the issue, is there any chance of getting the fix pushed out? How about someone confirming this to upstream, in upstream bug log, and suggesting the fix to be pushed for 3.6.6 (if not done already: I'm not in position to check upstream's BTS right now). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970679 Title: winbind coredumps when encountering a group with over 1000 members To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/970679/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 342056] Re: Samba automatic account creation assumes local accounts
The mksmbpasswd call has been dropped in Debian 2:3.6.5-2. So that should make it in Ubuntu one day or another -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342056 Title: Samba automatic account creation assumes local accounts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/342056/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 668368] Re: Default [homes] share template uses incorrect %S macro.
I use the %S macro in about all my servers, so it works perfectly well and this bug is invalid ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668368 Title: Default [homes] share template uses incorrect %S macro. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/668368/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 789097] Re: [Samba] idmap backend = tdb2 is broken in Ubuntu / Debian
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): The fix has been committed in the Debian package SVN. It will reach Debian unstable, then Ubuntu, when we upload a new release. A new package fixing this was uploaded in Debian unstable on Sunday June 5th. Package version is 2:3.5.8~dfsg-5. For Ubuntu, a resync with Debian unstable should fix the problem in the currently developed version whatever funky name it might have (I can't cope with Ubuntu release names!). A fix is probably needed for Ubuntu 11.04. I think that the diff between Debian 2:3.5.8~dfsg-4 and -5 should be OK. I'm not sure whether the problem is also in the current Ubuntu LTS. I'm awaiting for the Debian release managers approval for a fix to be uploaded for Debian stable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789097 Title: tdb2.so undefined symbol: dyn_get_STATEDIR (source code typo) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 789097] Re: [Samba] idmap backend = tdb2 is broken in Ubuntu / Debian
Quoting Dave Lawrence (d...@daftdroid.com): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The tdb2 backend for idmap is broken in Ubuntu and presumably debian. As reported here https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789097 Careful how you read it, the quoted patch is the source of the bug, NOT the fix. Thanks for pointing this out (I actually missed the BR in LP, even though I receive these bug reports). Brynnen Owen mentioned this to us, recently, indeed. The fix has been committed in the Debian package SVN. It will reach Debian unstable, then Ubuntu, when we upload a new release. Given that the fix is trivial but has important consequences for anybody wanting to use the TDB2 backend, I'll ask for permission to upload a fix in squeeze too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789097 Title: tdb2.so undefined symbol: dyn_get_STATEDIR (source code typo) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 458637] Re: Windows Live Sign-In assistant prevents samba from accessing Windows 7 shares
Quoting Christian Brandt (bran...@psi5.com): samba support in ubuntu always sucked biggest time. usually every ubuntu release only works with the second last windows version while the upstream samba team has patched and working versions out for months. samba with ubuntu is pretty much useless except I do EVERYTHING myself. It must be really hard to to a wget samba.tgz and deb-build samba.deb, must it? Thank you for being so supportive of the work of Debian and Ubuntu maiutnainers of samba. Your kind comments are really appreciated at their own value. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458637 Title: Windows Live Sign-In assistant prevents samba from accessing Windows 7 shares -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
This has just cropped up on my PC too (Xubuntu 9.10), after installing lirc, hangs on bootup just before the login screen (slim). (smb.conf is vanilla). Wouldn't work in recovery mode, told me about the nmbd pid but wouldn't let me do anything about it so CTRL-ALT-DEL was necessary. Samba version 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 Found that by removing quiet and splash from the grub boot entry I could boot up OK again, and nmbd and smbd showing in htop. The same was reported to Debian as well and looks like it is the same timing problem: http://bugs.debian.org/576415 I'm just discovering the long story of that LP#462169. It apparently got fixed in some Ubuntu packages and just forgot flowing upstream. If only I could find the patch in LP, it could be added to the Debian package but that bug is...ahemquite hairy. I get gazillion informations about the people who are subscribed to the bug but no obvious point that says *this is the fix*. -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #576415 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576415 -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 309539] Please help testing *Debian* packages fixing these bugs in samba
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 286119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 To Ubuntu Intrepid users experiencing these bugs: For Debian, I prepared samba 3.2.5 packages that supposedly fix them: * Fix segfault whan accessign some NAS devices running old versions of Samba Closes: #500129 * Fix process crush when using gethostbyname_r in several threads Closes: #509101, #510450 It would help a lot if you could test these packages. I suppose they will work properly on Ubuntu Intrepid but I haven't check this in reality. These packages are apt-get'able: deb http://pkg-samba.alioth.debian.org/packages-prospective/ ./ deb-src http://pkg-samba.alioth.debian.org/packages-prospective/ ./ Please note that using this source will upgrade any existing samba binary package on your systems. No *other* package should be upgraded by this operation. If you use aptitude, I recommend you simpulate the upgrade: aptitude update aptitude -s upgrade Please also note that reverting back to official Ubuntu packages would be recommended after this test, otherwise you might be later left with packages for which no more security updates will come. Still, if some of you could test and report if issues are fixed, that would help greatly to improve samba packages in Debian, which in turn will participate to the improvement of samba packages in Ubuntu. -- firefox 3.0.4 / 3.0.5 + libnss_wins ibex netswitch samba = firefox crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Quoting Thierry Carrez (thierry.car...@ubuntu.com): I'm kinda busy those days, but I'll refresh my PPA tomorrow with a 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.5~ppa1 that builds on the recent security release. Concerning the official intrepid update, I'll file a SRU report and let the ubuntu-sru powers decide if the fix is worth the regression risk, as this is definitely a complex patch. I welcome Samba developers comments Indeed, when I saw the patch sent by Kai to Debian bug #500129, I was a little bit scared:-) I initially intended to have the patch in Debian lenny but its size makes me hesitate (the policy for lenny as of now is not as strict as the polocy to update Debian stablebut, still, we're quite close to the release and our release managers ask all Debian maintainers to be very careful about patches fixing no release-crtical bugs. I think that, for Debian, I'll finally balance to include the patch, putting confidence in the work of two Samba Team developers...:-)...but that will not be an update for a stable version and I would not push it if it was for Debian stable. I suspect that Ubuntu's policy is about the same and, as Kai mentioned, it would be perfectly understandable if the patch is not accepted. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 106146] Re: Cannot mount cifs shares as normal user on directories not owned by the user
Quoting Jack Hanison (j...@hanison.co.uk): The upstream bug logged against the CifsVFS module within samba https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617 has not been updated in nearly two years. I've pinged a comment on that bug to enquire as to the status. Please also note that this bug is recorded in Debian BTS as #177584. If someone knows how to link Ubuntu bugs and Debian bugs, please do it..:-) I would personnally vote against applying a fix for this if it doesn't get upstream's approval. For Debian's samba packages, we always avoid applying changes that aren't motivated by something specific to the distribution...and I'd suggest the Ubuntu packagers to apply the same policy (as of now, Ubuntu packages are as close as possible to Debian ones). -- Cannot mount cifs shares as normal user on directories not owned by the user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 282298] Re: Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
Quoting Thierry Carrez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Debdiff for potential intrepid SRU samba (2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.1) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low * debian/patches/last-char-truncation.patch: Fix compatibility issue with NAS boxes still using Samba 2.2 or before (fixes LP: #282298) Was this submitted upstream (upstream being Debian or real upstream)? -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
Quoting Thierry Carrez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Christian: This patch was extracted from upstream Bugzilla bug [1] which was found referenced in the corresponding Debian bug [2]. So yes, this is already submitted both upstream and in Debian. [1] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5826 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495081 Hmm, OK, sorry for re-asking. Steve, that seems to be a good candidate for 3.2.4-2, what do you think? -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 225661] Re: Typo in /etc/samba/smb.conf (nsuccessful)
I really wonder how this typo ended up in Ubuntu's smb.conf while it isn't in the Debian package. Should I suspect a fork somewhere, or some recent changes in Debian packages that have'nt been applied to Ubuntu packages? (Debian maintainer hat on) -- Typo in /etc/samba/smb.conf (nsuccessful) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
