Re: [Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2011-01-28 Thread Curt Sampson
Unfortunately, I no longer have that particular configuration available for testing. (It's now in production, and I can no longer risk destroying the data on the disks.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in

[Bug 573171] Re: vmbuilder sometimes ignores --raw option

2010-12-04 Thread Curt Sampson
I didn't see a debug log appear; is there something special I need to do to get it? Are you unable to duplicate this bug? What options are you using that are different from mine? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2010-06-25 Thread Curt Sampson
On 2010-06-24 22:24 - (Thu), Steven Wagner wrote: As mentioned in comment #3, could this be related to a specific SATA chipset?...Ive noticed no difference for if the guest is using virtio or ide mode. For me the guests work fine in IDE mode; it's only virtio that has a problem. So, in a

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2010-05-04 Thread Curt Sampson
masc, the bug you pointed out appears to be when using a particular hardware SATA chipset; KVM isn't mentioned anywhere there. Are you saying that this happens with KVM guests when running on hosts without this problem? Using dd, I wrote new 60GB file (writing zeros) on a guest using the KVM IDE

[Bug 574665] [NEW] kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2010-05-03 Thread Curt Sampson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm See this bug: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2933400group_id=180599atid=893831 I have confirmed that this happens with 10.04 host and guest. Giving kvm a logical virtio volume of 1024 GB works; a logical volume of 1048

[Bug 573171] [NEW] vmbuilder sometimes ignores --raw option

2010-05-01 Thread Curt Sampson
Public bug reported: Using the following command: {{{ vmbuilder kvm ubuntu -v --debug \ --overwrite \ --raw=/dev/mapper/xxx --part=priv.partition \ --user=xxx --name=xxx --uid=1234 --gid=1234 \ --pass=xxx --ssh-user-key=/home/xxx/.ssh/authorized_keys \ --arch=amd64

[Bug 573171] Re: vmbuilder sometimes ignores --raw option

2010-05-01 Thread Curt Sampson
Actually, come to think of it, I would be perfectly happy if you'd change vmbuilder to take no command line options whatsoever, except perhaps to turn on debug output, and just take a config file with the myriad details necessary for setting up a new VM. -- vmbuilder sometimes ignores --raw

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2009-06-12 Thread Curt Sampson
I'm glad to hear you had good success with this with OpenBSD. It's also been working on NetBSD for many, many years now. -- Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2009-03-15 Thread Curt Sampson
As related in the original ticket description, all this stuff is working fine under NetBSD; the issue is not with the data, but with Ubuntu. In particular, there's certainly an issue with Ubuntu glibc that will simply not allow it to check the AD bit. While we only reported this recently, I'm

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2008-10-23 Thread Curt Sampson
Note also that the definition of RES_USE_DNSSEC (defined to be 0x0020) must be added to /usr/include/resolv.h in order for OpenSSH's openbsd-compat/getrrsetbyname.c to be able to set that bit when edns0 is set. -- Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2008-10-23 Thread Curt Sampson
It gets worse; I tried the above, and getrrsetbyname still doesn't get back a record with the AD bit set. (I verified that RES_USE_DNSSEC was set in the options passed to res_query.) Is the resolver broken? -- Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled