[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
Docs look better, but they also serve to highlight that the base config should be more fleshed out. That's a lot of non-trivial steps to get to a point where you can actually use your slapd install for something. -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
I'm not as enraged as others here, but I agree with Yannick. If we had a debconf based base configuration for cn=config, and removed it, then it should be put back in. Clearly having it would be less problematic for most users than not having it. -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 442498] Re: karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why ????
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 463684 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 Why is this marked as a duplicate of a documentation bug? There are documentation issues here, to be sure, but this is also a useful configuration missing by default bug, which isn't covered by #463684. -- karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic
Here's an interesting addition to this problem: In my cluster, one system is based on a core2duo CPU, while the other is based on an i7 920 CPU. When the VM is originally started on the i7, migration doesn't work. When it's originally started on the core2, it does. From this, I'm guessing that the VM tries to use more CPU features available on the newer CPU when starting, and then when it tries to migrate to the older CPU some of those instructions fail, and that causes the lock ups I've been seeing. I imagine this is also why this hasn't been reported a ton, since for people with matched systems they wouldn't see the problem. Can anyone else still experiencing this confirm / deny mismatched CPUs? -- VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic
Ok, updated to the latest libvirt packages from PPA:dnjl/virtualization. Now, the migrate, then suspend/resume suggestion works for me. Still less than ideal, as it kills the whole live migration thing, but at least it doesn't totally kill my VMs anymore. -- VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic
This was with a hardy/amd64 guest OS. I haven't tried any other guests, because the bulk of our VMs are supposed to be LTS installs. -- VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic
I'm seeing behaviour that looks like this on karmic/amd64, only a suspend/resume doesn't fix the VM. It stays hard locked. I can connect to it on the virtual serial console or via VNC, and it shows what was there before the migration, but it never unlocks and starts working. -- VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 489398] [NEW] Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV
Public bug reported: This is a bug reported in Debian and Redhat, which I'm currently seeing on fresh installs of Ubuntu/karmic. The details of my problem generally match the Debian bug report, which I'll link here. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 27 15:12:25 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: drbd8-utils 2:8.3.3-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-server SourcePackage: drbd8 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-server x86_64 ** Affects: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: drbd8 (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: drbd8 (Fedora) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 489398] Re: Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36181383/Dependencies.txt ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #533436 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533436 ** Also affects: drbd8 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533436 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #530881 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530881 ** Also affects: drbd8 (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530881 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 489398] Re: Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV
/etc/lvm/lvm.conf filter suggestion from redhat bug works well, actually. After filtering out the block device my drbd device is based on, lvcreate works as expected. -- Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Hey Kai-Cheung, Sorry I wasn't more explicit, but I *did* rebuild the required libraries from Tim's repo for jaunty. It still doesn't build properly for me. ;) I suspect that perhaps the build-deps on the packages aren't totally accurate, since I'm building on a fresh jaunty install inside a VM, and so I don't have any dev packages other than what apt-get build-dep pulls in. G -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I definitely agree about introducing into Karmic. That way there'll be some wider usage and testing before the next LTS. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Tim: Is it possible to get packages for jaunty into your repo? I'm getting errors trying to rebuild the packages on jaunty/amd64. It freaks out and generates a ton of errors trying to compile this: /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DBUILD_NUM=\2009.161.2056\ -I./ldap/include -I./ldap/servers/slapd -I./include -I. -DLOCALSTATEDIR=\/var\ -DSYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -DBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -DDOCDIR=\/usr/share/doc/dirsrv\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/dirsrv/plugins\ -DTEMPLATEDIR=\/usr/share/dirsrv/data\ -I/usr/include/mozldap -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/nss -I/usr/include/nss -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/sasl -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/nss -Wall -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -MT ldap/servers/slapd/libslapd_la-add.lo -MD -MP -MF ldap/servers/slapd/.deps/libslapd_la-add.Tpo -c -o ldap/servers/slapd/libslapd_la-add.lo `test -f 'ldap/servers/slapd/add.c' || echo './'`ldap/servers/slapd/add.c -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 289470] Re: open-iscsi user-space does not match kernel module version
Any update on when we'll see an updated package for this issue? -- open-iscsi user-space does not match kernel module version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
