[Bug 1015935] Re: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration

2012-06-25 Thread Kai Blin
Ok, this actually is a bug in libpam-smbpass, not in swat. When recompiling the packages with debug info, the backtrace from swat is: #0 0xb7217600 in ?? () #1 0xb7d7923c in _talloc_free () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtalloc.so.2 #2 0x8027fae1 in smb_iconv_close (cd=0x8081f768) at

[Bug 1013471] Re: swat goes blank on button click and logs panic internal error

2012-06-25 Thread Kai Blin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1015935 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015935 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1015935 SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 1015935] Re: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration

2012-06-23 Thread Kai Blin
Right, our bug reporter investigated this a bit further, and it turns out that removing libpam-smbpass fixes the crash, and reinstalling libpam-smbpass causes the crash to happen again. This also explains why starting swat without the authentication check doesn't trigger the crash. As a next

[Bug 1015935] [NEW] SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration

2012-06-21 Thread Kai Blin
Public bug reported: When running swat on a 32bit 12.04 install, swat segfaults when the user clicks on the Full View button in the configuration menu. This only happens on the 32bit install, the 64bit install seems fine. This was reported to upstream under

[Bug 1015935] Re: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration

2012-06-21 Thread Kai Blin
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #8999 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8999 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8999 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 790863] Re: Unable to start lxc container after update to 2.6.32-32

2011-12-08 Thread Kai Blin
Ok, my containers do start up again and seem to behave ok. I'm happy to test this for a more extended period of time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790863 Title:

[Bug 623342] Re: ntlm_auth returns invalid NT_KEY

2010-11-28 Thread Kai Blin
As of 2010-11-16, this bug is not yet confirmed to be fixed. If you want to help, please test the bugfix on the corresponding Samba bug and report your results on the Samba bugzilla. -- ntlm_auth returns invalid NT_KEY https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623342 You received this bug notification

[Bug 268663] Re: files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody

2010-03-10 Thread Kai Blin
See http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-September/124961.html for an explanation of the option -- files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268663 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 502149] Re: winbindd service and ntlm_auth

2010-01-04 Thread Kai Blin
Being the person responsible for the Wine dependency, here's my take on this: ntlm_auth without winbindd is technically useless for about every use case besides the (still) limited way Wine uses it. Given that most package managers go and install recommends, you'd then get (at best) Wine

[Bug 286119] Re: firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64

2009-05-01 Thread Kai Blin
Looks like the same bug. Does the patch from the upstream bugtracker fix it for you? -- firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 286119] Re: firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64

2009-05-01 Thread Kai Blin
If you scroll up to the top of the page, you see an affects package samba that links to the samba bugzilla (link is called samba-bugs). The patch is in there. -- firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 You

[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more

2009-01-06 Thread Kai Blin
Grobot, your smbclient problem is fixed with the fix to bug #264943. -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-29 Thread Kai Blin
As requested by Christian, here's a patch for the v3-2-stable tree, applies to both 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 without any problems. ** Attachment added: Complete patch for segfault, visibility issue and write issue. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20795250/bug_5953_complete.patch -- gvfsd-smb crashed

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-23 Thread Kai Blin
This is a bit tricky to fix, as we're basically not doing anything wrong. It seems like the TCP/IP stack and/or the SMB server on the NAS box doesn't cope with fragmentation. But that's one layer below of our control, and perfectly valid in TCP networking. However, Samba developer Volker Lendecke

[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more

2008-12-18 Thread Kai Blin
I have to admit that the Nautilus error is all but helpful. Could you try with smbclient as described by the initial reporter and check if that works or give the error output from smbclient? -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-17 Thread Kai Blin
Thanks for the traces, I'll have a look at them first thing tomorrow. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. --

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-17 Thread Kai Blin
Ok, it seems like we're misreporting the byte count in the WriteAndX request, looking at a fix. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Blin
The ls command in smbclient works just as expected against a Samba server. I suspect that the server's handling of the list command is broken, but I'd need a network trace of this. Ideally for a directory that contains multiple files with multiple suffixes, running ls, ls *.one of the suffixes ls

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Blin
Well, you'd probably see the ERRHRD - 39 bug if you try to put a file without doing an ls first, on a broken CIFS server. But anyway, separate report for this, please. We can discuss if it's really something that should be fixed in Samba that report ;) A good way to get a working NAS box is to

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Blin
Ok, seems like we're also tracking the write problem in the same Samba bug, so I'd suggest we keep the discussion here after all. I can confirm that if this worked with Samba 3.0 and works with Windows, there's a Samba bug we need to fix. Could anyone get me a trace of Samba 3.2 trying to put a

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-16 Thread Kai Blin
As a short status update, especially for the Ubuntu packaging folks: - A patch in Samba 3.2.6 fixes the crash bug, but does not correctly display all the directories. - The patch I posted, which fixes the display problem, has been pushed to the v3-2-test branch and will be in the next 3.2.

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-15 Thread Kai Blin
Hm, our initial guess is that these NAS disks all run the same CIFS server, which doesn't handle what our smbclient is sending and dies, giving back a disk full error. It should be unrelated to the segfault this bug is about, though. I'm still trying to contact the person who initially added that

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-12 Thread Kai Blin
The pcap dump (i.e. the binary data, not the text file) was pretty much what I needed. Thanks alot. Could anyone try the attached patch on top of current v3-2-test git? ** Attachment added: Fix offset check in interpret_long_filename http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20398252/bug_5953_fix.patch

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-11 Thread Kai Blin
This is tracked in a different Samba bug. ** Changed in: samba Bugwatch: Samba Bugzilla #5942 = Samba Bugzilla #5953 Status: Invalid = Unknown -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-11 Thread Kai Blin
Seems like Jeremy Allison pushed a fix for that to git on 2008-12-08 already. However, the reporter of the samba bug is experiencing the same issues as rossjenkins. I'll follow up on that. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-09 Thread Kai Blin
I would be wary to remove the offset check. I'm not really into that code, but removing it will break offsets when there actually is no name in that Info1 struct. Can anybody provide a tcpdump/wireshark capture file of a smb connection that causes mentioned segfault? -- gvfsd-smb crashed with

[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-12-09 Thread Kai Blin
I'll look into this some more tomorrow. This seems to be an issue introduced in Samba 3.2.x. I should be able to write a test case using the network trace. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more

2008-11-21 Thread Kai Blin
Yes, that's because Samba disabled the old, insecure lanman auth authentication scheme per default a couple of versions back. As you said, it's easy to turn on from the config file. :) -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You