[Bug 1015935] Re: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration
Ok, this actually is a bug in libpam-smbpass, not in swat. When recompiling the packages with debug info, the backtrace from swat is: #0 0xb7217600 in ?? () #1 0xb7d7923c in _talloc_free () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtalloc.so.2 #2 0x8027fae1 in smb_iconv_close (cd=0x8081f768) at ../lib/util/charset/iconv.c:337 #3 0x8026ee61 in close_iconv_convenience (data=0x80812228) at ../lib/util/charset/codepoints.c:203 #4 0x8026f08c in smb_iconv_convenience_reinit (mem_ctx=0x0, dos_charset=0x80816c08 CP850, unix_charset=0x80816bc8 UTF-8, display_charset=0xb745930c UTF-8, native_iconv=true, old_ic=0x80812228) at ../lib/util/charset/codepoints.c:265 #5 0x8025b037 in init_iconv () at lib/charcnv.c:78 #6 0x8025af8c in lazy_initialize_conv () at lib/charcnv.c:55 #7 0x8025bb59 in convert_string_talloc (ctx=0x80816b90, from=CH_UTF8, to=CH_UNIX, src=0x8081cd60, srclen=9, dst=0xb670, converted_size=0xb674, allow_bad_conv=true) at lib/charcnv.c:480 #8 0x8007207d in cgi_load_variables () at web/cgi.c:214 #9 0x80079c4c in main (argc=1, argv=0xb824) at web/swat.c:1581 Note the call to close_iconv_convenience() in frame 3. Now, when looking at libpam-smbpass.so symbols with nm, this gives the following iconv-related output: 0008fe20 t close_iconv_convenience 0008fd4c T get_iconv_convenience 00207a80 B global_iconv_convenience U iconv@@GLIBC_2.1 U iconv_close@@GLIBC_2.1 000a111b t iconv_copy U iconv_open@@GLIBC_2.1 000a1057 t iconv_swab 0007c01a T init_iconv 000a0364 t lazy_initialize_iconv 000a03ff T smb_iconv 000a0af6 T smb_iconv_close 00090085 T smb_iconv_convenience_reinit 000a0abc T smb_iconv_open 000a0686 T smb_iconv_open_ex 000a0600 t smb_iconv_t_destructor 000a0389 t sys_iconv Again, note the t close_iconv_convenience, which as far as I understand says that libpam-smbpass contains close_iconv_convenience in it's text section, so there's a copy of that call in libpam-smbpass. Now, if libpam-smbpass is loaded, it seems like swat uses the wrong version of that call, and things go wrong. If you comment out the libpam-smbpass line in /etc/pam.d/common-auth, The crash is gone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015935 Title: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1015935/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1013471] Re: swat goes blank on button click and logs panic internal error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1015935 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015935 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1015935 SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013471 Title: swat goes blank on button click and logs panic internal error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1013471/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1015935] Re: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration
Right, our bug reporter investigated this a bit further, and it turns out that removing libpam-smbpass fixes the crash, and reinstalling libpam-smbpass causes the crash to happen again. This also explains why starting swat without the authentication check doesn't trigger the crash. As a next step, I'll install libpam-smbpass for a from source build to see if _that_ reproduces the crash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015935 Title: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1015935/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1015935] [NEW] SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration
Public bug reported: When running swat on a 32bit 12.04 install, swat segfaults when the user clicks on the Full View button in the configuration menu. This only happens on the 32bit install, the 64bit install seems fine. This was reported to upstream under https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8999 but can only be reproduced with the distro packages. swat crashes with the following backtrace (sorry for the missing debug symbols, the samba-dbg package doesn't seem to help gdb getting debug symbols for swat): (gdb) bt #0 0xb72340c0 in ?? () #1 0xb7d7923c in _talloc_free () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtalloc.so.2 #2 0x80215875 in smb_iconv_close () #3 0x80204d65 in ?? () #4 0x802051d8 in smb_iconv_convenience_reinit () #5 0x801f2bf5 in init_iconv () #6 0x801f2c32 in lazy_initialize_conv () #7 0x801f35e5 in convert_string_talloc () #8 0x80074c99 in cgi_load_variables () #9 0x80071e3c in main () A relatively straightforward way to reproduce the crash in gdb is running gdb swat, and then typing in GET /viewconfig HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic base64 of user:pass then grab the xsrf and xsrf_time values in the form displayed... GET /viewconfig?full_view=Full+Viewxsrf=xsrfxsrf_time=xsrf_time HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic base64 of user:pass and the segfault happens. With the current v3-6-test git HEAD from the samba git, this doesn't happen. The last time this code was touched upstream was in 2009, so I'm not sure a code change caused this. You cannot reproduce the crash if you start swat with -a to skip the authentication logic, so you need to set up a root password for this to work. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: swat 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jun 20 13:41:39 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120424.1) NmbdLog: Packet send failed to 10.0.2.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument Packet send failed to 10.0.2.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument OtherFailedConnect: Yes ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_IE:en TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_IE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: Yes SmbConfIncluded: Yes SourcePackage: samba UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: samba Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015935 Title: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1015935/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1015935] Re: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #8999 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8999 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8999 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015935 Title: SWAT segfaults when trying to view full configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1015935/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 790863] Re: Unable to start lxc container after update to 2.6.32-32
Ok, my containers do start up again and seem to behave ok. I'm happy to test this for a more extended period of time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790863 Title: Unable to start lxc container after update to 2.6.32-32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/790863/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 623342] Re: ntlm_auth returns invalid NT_KEY
As of 2010-11-16, this bug is not yet confirmed to be fixed. If you want to help, please test the bugfix on the corresponding Samba bug and report your results on the Samba bugzilla. -- ntlm_auth returns invalid NT_KEY https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 268663] Re: files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody
See http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-September/124961.html for an explanation of the option -- files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership, instead of nobody https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 502149] Re: winbindd service and ntlm_auth
Being the person responsible for the Wine dependency, here's my take on this: ntlm_auth without winbindd is technically useless for about every use case besides the (still) limited way Wine uses it. Given that most package managers go and install recommends, you'd then get (at best) Wine recommending ntlm_auth recommending winbindd, which (for all my understanding of packaging) would still leave you with winbindd being installed. In the future (depending on how soon I get around to work on this again), the coupling between Wine and the Samba Authentication service (aka winbindd) will increase. Given that most other distros also package ntlm_auth with the winbind package, I'm not convinced Ubuntu should deviate from the packaging single-handedly. Of course that's the Ubuntu packager's decision, not mine. I'd say if winbindd starting up really bothers you more than the fact that Wine is installed but never used, I'd suggest you just update-rc.d -f winbindd remove (or however you do the same with the new system). -- winbindd service and ntlm_auth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 286119] Re: firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64
Looks like the same bug. Does the patch from the upstream bugtracker fix it for you? -- firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 286119] Re: firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64
If you scroll up to the top of the page, you see an affects package samba that links to the samba bugzilla (link is called samba-bugs). The patch is in there. -- firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins: 8.10beta AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
Grobot, your smbclient problem is fixed with the fix to bug #264943. -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
As requested by Christian, here's a patch for the v3-2-stable tree, applies to both 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 without any problems. ** Attachment added: Complete patch for segfault, visibility issue and write issue. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20795250/bug_5953_complete.patch -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
This is a bit tricky to fix, as we're basically not doing anything wrong. It seems like the TCP/IP stack and/or the SMB server on the NAS box doesn't cope with fragmentation. But that's one layer below of our control, and perfectly valid in TCP networking. However, Samba developer Volker Lendecke has created a patch that should fix this in a way we'd include into our code. Thierry, one more patch for your PPA :) ** Attachment added: Volker's patch for NAS write errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20682229/bug_5953_iovec.patch -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
I have to admit that the Nautilus error is all but helpful. Could you try with smbclient as described by the initial reporter and check if that works or give the error output from smbclient? -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Thanks for the traces, I'll have a look at them first thing tomorrow. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Ok, it seems like we're misreporting the byte count in the WriteAndX request, looking at a fix. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
The ls command in smbclient works just as expected against a Samba server. I suspect that the server's handling of the list command is broken, but I'd need a network trace of this. Ideally for a directory that contains multiple files with multiple suffixes, running ls, ls *.one of the suffixes ls filename.* and ls filename.suffix. However, this is a separate issue as well, so how about you open a new bug report for this? Feel free to subscribe me to that. Cheers, Kai -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Well, you'd probably see the ERRHRD - 39 bug if you try to put a file without doing an ls first, on a broken CIFS server. But anyway, separate report for this, please. We can discuss if it's really something that should be fixed in Samba that report ;) A good way to get a working NAS box is to get one that's running a 3.x version of Samba, in my biased opinion. At least in that case you won't have any trouble convincing me that any CIFS issues you're seeing are a Samba problem ;) -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Ok, seems like we're also tracking the write problem in the same Samba bug, so I'd suggest we keep the discussion here after all. I can confirm that if this worked with Samba 3.0 and works with Windows, there's a Samba bug we need to fix. Could anyone get me a trace of Samba 3.2 trying to put a file onto the NAS and Samba 3.0 putting a file onto the NAS? That's probably easier than working out how to make the NAS accessible from the network. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
As a short status update, especially for the Ubuntu packaging folks: - A patch in Samba 3.2.6 fixes the crash bug, but does not correctly display all the directories. - The patch I posted, which fixes the display problem, has been pushed to the v3-2-test branch and will be in the next 3.2. bugfix release. - Not addressed so far is the smbclient put regression, still working on this. Ross: I very much doubt Iomega is shipping a Samba3 install. Samba3 replies to the list dir request with an info level 260 reply, info level 1 is _ancient_. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Hm, our initial guess is that these NAS disks all run the same CIFS server, which doesn't handle what our smbclient is sending and dies, giving back a disk full error. It should be unrelated to the segfault this bug is about, though. I'm still trying to contact the person who initially added that OS/2 offset check my patch changes, just to make sure I don't break smbclient for OS/2. Once that's sorted out, I can push a patch for this issue. I think it would make sense to track the write error in a separate bug report, as I'm not totally convinced it's a Samba bug at all. :) -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
The pcap dump (i.e. the binary data, not the text file) was pretty much what I needed. Thanks alot. Could anyone try the attached patch on top of current v3-2-test git? ** Attachment added: Fix offset check in interpret_long_filename http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20398252/bug_5953_fix.patch -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
This is tracked in a different Samba bug. ** Changed in: samba Bugwatch: Samba Bugzilla #5942 = Samba Bugzilla #5953 Status: Invalid = Unknown -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Seems like Jeremy Allison pushed a fix for that to git on 2008-12-08 already. However, the reporter of the samba bug is experiencing the same issues as rossjenkins. I'll follow up on that. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
I would be wary to remove the offset check. I'm not really into that code, but removing it will break offsets when there actually is no name in that Info1 struct. Can anybody provide a tcpdump/wireshark capture file of a smb connection that causes mentioned segfault? -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 264943] Re: gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
I'll look into this some more tomorrow. This seems to be an issue introduced in Samba 3.2.x. I should be able to write a test case using the network trace. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 282298] Re: [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more
Yes, that's because Samba disabled the old, insecure lanman auth authentication scheme per default a couple of versions back. As you said, it's easy to turn on from the config file. :) -- [SRU] Intrepid: No Access to NAS (samba=2.2.x) shares any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
