[Bug 962615] Re: Unable to list volumes after building from snapshot

2012-06-05 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
** Branch linked: lp:~kiall/nova/fix-snapshot-id -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962615 Title: Unable to list volumes after building from snapshot To manage

[Bug 939122] Re: floating ips do not display in 'nova list' after association to instance

2012-05-22 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939122 Title: floating ips do not display in 'nova list'

[Bug 930255] Re: Keystone's precise dbconfig uses incorrect case for roles.

2012-02-22 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
I should probably have mentioned, nova checks these roles in a case sensitive manor. Using the wrong case means the roles simply will not work.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.

[Bug 930255] [NEW] Keystone's precise dbconfig uses incorrect case for roles.

2012-02-10 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
Public bug reported: The recently merged packaging dbconfig uses Admin rather than admin during role creation. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/919373 and https://review.openstack.org/3229 ** Affects: keystone (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 912066] Re: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-27 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
This is a nova bug all right, supplies the incorrect device name in the ec2 metadata. Nova supplies the following: 'block-device-mapping': {'ami': 'vda', 'root': '/dev/vda', 'swap': '/dev/vdc'}, When it should supply this:

[Bug 912066] Re: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-27 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
I should mention, I believe the fix is for nova to ask for the device to be attached at /dev/vdb when there is no ephemeral disk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.

[Bug 912066] Re: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-17 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
** Also affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912066 Title: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap

[Bug 912066] Re: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-17 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
Libvirt XML: http://paste.ubuntu.com/807484/ Instance metadata: http://paste.ubuntu.com/807485/ $ ls /dev/vd* /dev/vda /dev/vda1 /dev/vdb $ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # file system mount point type options dump

[Bug 912066] Re: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-17 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
$ sudo blkid /dev/vdb /dev/vdb: UUID=3447f2ad-9c81-4b95-ab3d-d5ff7aacbfa6 TYPE=swap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912066 Title: /etc/fstab contains incorrect

[Bug 912066] [NEW] /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-04 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
Public bug reported: On OpenStack using a flavor with no ephemeral storage, but with swap space, cloud-init creates an invalid /etc/fstab Given this favor (Note: Storage: 0GB and Swap: 2048MB): p1.small: Memory: 3072MB, VCPUS: 4, Storage: 0GB, FlavorID: 15, Swap: 2048MB, RXTX Quota: 0GB, RXTX

[Bug 912066] Re: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no ephemeral disk present.

2012-01-04 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
Also, This is on the Oneiric cloud-image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912066 Title: /etc/fstab contains incorrect device for swap partition when no

[Bug 870168] Re: Kernel Oops - Oneiric KVM/OpenStack triggers 'Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer deference'

2011-10-09 Thread Kiall
Okay - I've managed to get about 24 hours without a panic! (With the stock oneiric packages ie 3.0 kernel etc) To fix this issue, I purged all OpenStack components, Wiped the OpenStack database and re-installed. I say fix because obviously the Oops should never have occurred at all, regardless

[Bug 870168] Re: Kernel Oops - Oneiric KVM/OpenStack triggers 'Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer deference'

2011-10-08 Thread Kiall
** Also affects: kvm Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.

[Bug 870168] Re: Kernel Oops - Oneiric KVM/OpenStack triggers 'Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer deference'

2011-10-08 Thread Kiall
Just tested with the mainline 3.0.6-030006-generic kernel, still panicking... http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.0.6-oneiric/linux- image-3.0.6-030006-generic_3.0.6-030006.201110050043_amd64.deb and ... Just tested with the mainline 3.1.0-0301rc9-generic kernel, this kernel after

[Bug 870168] Re: Kernel Oops - Oneiric KVM/OpenStack triggers 'Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer deference'

2011-10-08 Thread Kiall
Damn - 3.1.0-0301rc9-generic lasted *much* longer, but eventually ended with another Oops... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870168 Title: Kernel Oops - Oneiric

[Bug 697601] Re: Keepalived version bump to 1.2.1

2011-05-30 Thread Kiall
++ We're building our own packages for IPv6 Support... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697601 Title: Keepalived version bump to 1.2.1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 680301] Re: DNS Search Domain in instance /etc/resov.conf should be set by DHCP

2011-04-05 Thread Kiall
Its actually simpler than that :) L1032 of net/vnetwork.c is fprintf(fp, subnet %s netmask %s {\n option subnet-mask %s;\n option broadc . change it to .. fprintf(fp, subnet %s netmask %s {\n option domain-name \eucalyptus.internal\;\n option subnet-mask %s;\n option broadc ... and

[Bug 680301] Re: DNS Search Domain in instance /etc/resov.conf should be set by DHCP

2011-04-05 Thread Kiall
Also re (I'm using the CLC private IP, because when using the public IP, the returning packets are from the local address, and dns doesn't like it.) .. Thats a mix of two issues i think .. Lets say your instance FQDN is euca-172-19-1-2.eucalyptus.internal /

[Bug 680301] Re: DNS Search Domain in instance /etc/resov.conf should be set by DHCP

2011-04-05 Thread Kiall
Aha - I didn't noticed it was /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf you were editing, rather than /etc/resolv.conf Re the change to net/vnetwork.c .. The only config option that would require that line to change (when DNS is delegated correctly) is when DISABLE_DNS=Y it should use the original version .. No

[Bug 663920] Re: public IPs unroutable from instances

2011-01-29 Thread Kiall
I believe this is the same issue as https://bugs.launchpad.net/eucalyptus/+bug/676167 I've been told that issue is fixed in the nightly builds.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

[Bug 676832] Re: Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-19 Thread Kiall
I should have also mentioned - the Ghost instance (i-307905AD) was a real instance that had been terminated, possibly before it had left the pending state. -- Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 676721] [NEW] Security Group names differ between DescribeInstancesResponse and RunInstancesResponse API calls

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
Public bug reported: Assuming the username kiall and security group app the XML responses differ between DescribeInstances and RunInstances. Attached are the full XML responses. Describe Instances Response shows: groupSet item groupIdapp/groupId /item

[Bug 676721] Re: Security Group names differ between DescribeInstancesResponse and RunInstancesResponse API calls

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Attachment added: DescribeInstancesResponse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676721/+attachment/1736591/+files/DescribeInstancesResponse.txt -- Security Group names differ between DescribeInstancesResponse and RunInstancesResponse API calls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676721 You

[Bug 676721] Re: Security Group names differ between DescribeInstancesResponse and RunInstancesResponse API calls

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Attachment added: RunInstancesResponse https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/676721/+attachment/1736596/+files/RunInstancesResponse.txt ** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Security Group names differ between

[Bug 676819] [NEW] Attaching a volume to a pending instance claims success, but never attaches.

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
Public bug reported: Attaching a volume to a pending instance claims success (via euca2ools, and the API) but never attaches to the instance. This may be a KVM only issue. As its pretty easy to reproduce, I haven't attached much in the way of detail - let me know if you need any specific info.

[Bug 676819] Re: Attaching a volume to a pending instance claims success, but never attaches.

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Description changed: Attaching a volume to a pending instance claims success (via euca2ools, and the API) but never attaches to the instance. This may be a KVM only issue. As its pretty easy to reproduce, I haven't attached much in the way of detail - let me know if you need any

[Bug 676832] [NEW] Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
AVAILABILITYZONE|- m1.xlarge / 4 15360 5 AVAILABILITYZONE|- c1.xlarge / 8 15361 5 ki...@wk08-lmst:~/Desktop/CloudConfig$ euca-describe-instances RESERVATION r-371406C3 kiall phostr-app INSTANCEi-456F080E emi-077E15DD

[Bug 676832] Re: Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Attachment added: NC axis2c.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832/+attachment/1736917/+files/axis2c.log -- Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 676832] Re: Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Attachment added: NC euca_test_nc.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/676832/+attachment/1736927/+files/euca_test_nc.log -- Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 676832] Re: Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Attachment added: NC httpd-nc_error_log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/676832/+attachment/1736936/+files/httpd-nc_error_log -- Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 676832] Re: Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
** Attachment added: NC nc.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/676832/+attachment/1736937/+files/nc.log ** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832 You

[Bug 676832] Re: Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP

2010-11-17 Thread Kiall
`service eucalyptus-(nc|walrus|sc|cloud|cc) restart` each had no effect... `service eucalyptus restart` free'd the IP.. -- Ghost instance using a slot + elastic IP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 676167] Re: Hairpin NAT on CC disabled - EC2 inconsistency

2010-11-16 Thread Kiall
** Description changed: + + Impact statement: This bug causes several issues warranting a fix in maverick/lucid + + A) Prevents correct communication between instances (eg icmp-reply from priv IP when pub IP was ping'd) + B) Blocks communication to the local instance via its public ip +

[Bug 673445] [NEW] USE_VIRTIO_DISK config option ignored for EBS volumes

2010-11-10 Thread Kiall
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 10.10 / eucalyptus-2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 / amd64 After setting USE_VIRTIO_DISK=1 (the default actually..) in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf and performing a clean restart virtio is not used while attaching an EBS volume. I discovered this due to a related bug

[Bug 673445] Re: USE_VIRTIO_DISK config option ignored for EBS volumes

2010-11-10 Thread Kiall
** Patch added: My *dirty* patch that intentionally breaks correct behavior in order to verify the wrong branch of the if/else was being executed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673445/+attachment/1728847/+files/euca.diff -- USE_VIRTIO_DISK config option ignored for EBS volumes

[Bug 673445] Re: USE_VIRTIO_DISK config option ignored for EBS volumes

2010-11-10 Thread Kiall
And .. As always with filing a bug. I just noticed a mistake on my part! L436 of node/handlers_kvm.c forces the use of a non-virtio mount thanks to me specifying a sdX device name rather than vdX .. I'll dig around for the close button! -- USE_VIRTIO_DISK config option ignored for EBS volumes

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-11-10 Thread Kiall
Yes - 100% sure. I've since discovered that using /dev/vdX works without a reboot, while /dev/sdX does not work until after a reboot! vdX triggers the use of virtio, while sdX uses the standard method .. whatever that is! I stopped digging once i got it working with vdX :) -- dynamic block

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-11-10 Thread Kiall
@Wolfgang: Yes - Specifying, for example, /dev/vda triggers the use of virtio over the standard - and works exactly as you would expect EBS volumes to :) There *is* still a bug preventing /dev/sdX from working .. but I've sank too much time into finding it at the moment, I'll probably dig in

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-11-09 Thread Kiall
@Wolfgang I believe this is still an issue in maverick/10.10 aswell. I can attach a volume with UEC (10.10 metal and 10.10 instance). If you issue a `shutdown -r now` within the instance, the volume will be attached after the reboot... just spent about 8 hours getting that far! -- dynamic block