[Bug 497790] Re: squid should provide an apparmor profile

2010-07-06 Thread PatRiehecky
Per the suggestion from Mathias, I am working on a source branch and
PPA.  I have a round 1 of the code and associated packages that I need
to do more testing on before proceeding.  Subscribers that care can find
the PPA at https://launchpad.net/~jcpunk/+archive/squid-fix-497790

I should get some good testing in this week.  When I've tested more I
will follow through with the merge proposal.

-- 
squid should provide an apparmor profile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497790] [NEW] squid should provide an apparmor profile

2009-12-17 Thread PatRiehecky
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: squid

There is a sample squid apparmor profile at
http://apparmor.opensuse.org/profiles/list.  I have modified the sample
profile to meet Ubuntu standards and updated the packaging scripts to
install and active the profile.  It has been tested on my production
squid server using external auth for 2 months without problems.

** Affects: squid (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
squid should provide an apparmor profile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497790] Re: squid should provide an apparmor profile

2009-12-17 Thread PatRiehecky

** Attachment added: adds apparmor profile and installation
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36907869/squid_apparmor.patch

-- 
squid should provide an apparmor profile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 127180] Re: Install squid in chroot by default

2009-12-17 Thread PatRiehecky
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 497790 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497790

The Ubuntu side of this can be obsoleted by bug 497790 where I have
attached a patch giving an apparmor profile to squid.  Debian may wish
to pursue this further to have a more flexible solution.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 497790
   squid should provide an apparmor profile

-- 
Install squid in chroot by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127180
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423246] [NEW] slapd should have a ufw profile

2009-09-02 Thread PatRiehecky
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: slapd

UFW has a location for applications to drop in their ports for easy
access.  I have attached a patch that, when applied to the build diff,
will generate and deploy a ufw profile for slapd.

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
slapd should have a ufw profile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 423246] Re: slapd should have a ufw profile

2009-09-02 Thread PatRiehecky

** Attachment added: patch to create ufw profile
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31247590/slapd_ufw.patch

-- 
slapd should have a ufw profile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 244925] Re: slapd reports wrong ssf using gnutls

2008-10-27 Thread PatRiehecky
I can confirm it is fixed in Intrepid.  My Hardy box has a custom build
in production so that may be a ways before testing can be done.

-- 
slapd reports wrong ssf using gnutls
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 244925] [NEW] slapd reports wrong ssf using gnutls

2008-07-02 Thread PatRiehecky
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: slapd

More information in this thread : http://www.openldap.org/lists
/openldap-software/200806/msg00065.html

The ssf matching is broken on gnutls with openldap 2.4
(http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/msg00072.html).  At
the highest cypher the reported ssf is 32 which seems a stark contrast
to the 256 that is reported by the same cypher at the same bit strength
using openssl.  The debian project has made its stance on linking to
gnutls for openldap.  Ubuntu is not so strict with the purity of the
tree (some gpl code is linked to bsd code a few random places), is there
any way the Ubuntu team could link this to openssl - or better yet ask
Canonical to get a ruling from their lawyers as to the validity of the
Debian project's choice on the matter?

I am half tempted to check security on this as it breaks a large piece
of the encryption enforcement, but since it breaks it in an obvious way
and provides the user no false sense of security I will forgo it.

** Affects: openldap2.3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
slapd reports wrong ssf using gnutls
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 244925] Re: slapd reports wrong ssf using gnutls

2008-07-02 Thread PatRiehecky

** Attachment added: Patch to switch the configure.options to use openssl
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15762784/enable_openssl.diff

-- 
slapd reports wrong ssf using gnutls
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs