[Bug 1460389] Re: Version number mismatches: 2.0 beta but actually 1.8.6

2015-06-17 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
After looking further, this likely came from experimental - it's since been pulled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to groovy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460389 Title: Version number mismatches: 2.0 beta

[Bug 1460389] Re: Version number mismatches: 2.0 beta but actually 1.8.6

2015-06-17 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Groovy = 2.0 is packaged as src:groovy2 - this package will never be = 2.0. Looks like we need an epoch (perhaps even in Debian) to unbreak this. Triaging. ** Changed in: groovy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: groovy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You

[Bug 1387805] Re: docker.io containers cannot use local dnsmasq

2015-06-02 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
127.0.0.1 inside the container isn't the same as 127.0.0.1 inside the container. I'm OK calling this a container misconfiguration. I've not tried, but try setting dnsmasq to bind to the docker0 interface (likely bind to 172.17.42.1) and hit that IP. Otherwise you're hitting 127.0.0.1 in the

[Bug 1422416] Re: apt-get install docker.io does not install required package lxc

2015-02-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Closing as invalid. This is not required on Debian nor Ubuntu, you likely are missing both of aufs and devicemapper, and falling back to the lxc backend. I don't even think that relation is a recommends. Thanks for the report, but unless this is present on Ubuntu or Debian, it's not getting

[Bug 1422406] Re: docker command gives wrong install help

2015-02-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Seems like another Mint bug. Closing. Likely a result of command-not-found checking the wrong suite. ** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to docker.io in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1407841] Re: docker.io package fails install if docker group is pre-existing

2015-01-05 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
I'm marking this as Opinion. Here's why: The local sysadmin may have created a Docker group, but *not* intended to give the rights to use Docker to those users. Remember, the Docker group is root equivelent. [tag@cassiel:~][⌚ 09:02 PM] ♥ docker run -it --rm -v /./:/mnt debian:unstable